
CHRO and Dana Peterson v. City of Hartford
Status: Verlust
Aktualisieren The Connecticut Appeals Court sided with the City of Hartford, ruling on September 18, 2012, that the trial court improperly reversed the original finding of the CHRO referee. Peterson’s petition to have the case reviewed by the Connecticut Supreme Court was denied, leaving her with no further recourse and ending the matter.
GLAD participated in the appeal of a Connecticut Commission on Human Rights (CHRO) finding against a police sergeant, Dana Peterson, who was denied a position as a canine handler – a coveted and publicly visible position within the force – because she is transgender. The Connecticut Superior Court issued an initial ruling that the CHRO referee ignored serious evidence of discrimination. The City of Hartford appealed that decision in the Connecticut Appeals Court. GLAD filed an amicus knapp in the case, and oral argument took place Tuesday, November 29, 2011.
The Hartford Courant: Transgender Police Officer Still Fighting for Equality
Verwandte Inhalte
-
Ein Update zum Kampf für LGBTQ+-Rechte
Mehr lesenWir kämpfen unermüdlich, um unsere hart erkämpften Rechte zu schützen und uns gegen Versuche zu wehren, unser Leben und unsere persönlichsten Entscheidungen zu kontrollieren.
-
Veränderungen außerhalb der Gerichte bewirken
Mehr lesenGLAD nutzt eine Kombination aus wirkungsvollen juristischen, politischen und anwaltschaftlichen Instrumenten, um die Rassen-, Wirtschafts- und LGBTQ+-Gerechtigkeit voranzutreiben.
-
Soule et al. gegen CT Association of Schools et al.
Mehr lesenAm 14. Oktober 2021 reichte GLAD zusammen mit dem National Center for Transgender Equality einen Amicus Curiae-Schriftsatz ein …