
Crandall v. Boston Concession Group
Status: Sieg
GLAD won a ruling that Massachusetts non-discrimination law applies equally to every employee of Massachusetts companies, even if the employee works out-of-state. GLAD represented two women from Maine who worked in Maine and were essentially terminated after their employers learned they were lesbians. Our clients filed a complaint at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) under the Massachusetts non-discrimination law because their former employer was a Massachusetts-based company. After the MCAD dismissed our clients’ claim for lack of jurisdiction because the events occurred in Maine, GLAD appealed to Suffolk Superior Court. The Superior Court denied motions to dismiss by the MCAD and the employer, and the MCAD then agreed to reverse its position and announced that it would hear claims brought by out-of-state employees against in-state employers. The employer also negotiated a settlement with our clients.
Verwandte Inhalte
-
Expanding GLAD Answers’ Reach
Mehr lesenOur GLAD Answers legal infoline is working to help as many people as possible across New England.
-
New Maine Confirmatory Adoption Law Increases Security for LGBTQ+ Families
Mehr lesenThe new law provides key protections for LGBTQ+ families that reflect Maine’s longstanding commitment to protecting all children.
-
LGBTQ+-Familien in Gefahr: Aktualisierung der Elternschaftsgesetze zum Schutz von LGBTQ+-Eltern und ihren Kindern
Mehr lesenGLAD führt die Bemühungen zur Verabschiedung des Massachusetts Parentage Act und zum Schutz von LGBTQ+-Familien im ganzen Land an.