Der Blog

Healthcare Bans are an Attack on Our Community’s Well-being, Decision-making, and Freedom

“Taking away our opportunity to help our daughter live a healthy and happy life is cruel and unfair.”

The quotes on this page are all from Florida parents GLAD represents in Doe gegen Ladapo challenging a policy, first enacted by the state Boards of Medicine and Osteopathic Medicine codified in SB 254, that bans them from meeting essential healthcare needs for their transgender children. GLAD’s Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights, Jennifer Levi, was in federal court in Tallahassee on May 19 asking the judge to halt the ban and stop the unimaginable cruelty and distress these families face because they can’t access the healthcare they need.

In the ongoing campaign against LGBTQ+ rights, extremist forces are pushing for discriminatory legislation that specifically targets vulnerable members of our community, particularly LGBTQ+ youth and their families. One of the most alarming aspects of this campaign is the banning and, in some cases, criminalizing of safe and effective medical care for transgender youth.

“This ban puts me and other parents in the nightmare position of not being able to help our child when they need us most.”

As of May 2023, at least 19 states (Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia) have implemented these policies.

These bans disregard scientific evidence, representing an unjustified intrusion into personal and family medical decision-making. They contradict established guidelines based on extensive clinical research and are endorsed by esteemed medical associations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Doctors with expertise in treating the distress experienced by transgender youth unable to live authentically, as well as parents who witness the positive transformation in their transgender children when supported, widely criticize these bans.

“Having the resources and support to make the best decisions for our daughter’s wellbeing has been so important for our family. We just want to do what’s right for our kid.”

GLAD is challenging the bans in Florida and Alabama, arguing that they unlawfully deprive parents of their right to make decisions about their children’s medical treatment and violate the equal protection rights of transgender youth by denying them essential, doctor-recommended healthcare.

In fact, LGBTQ+ legal organizations are contesting these policies in nearly every state where they have been passed.

Encouragingly, even judges in the most conservative communities have recognized the unconstitutional nature of these bans, which infringe upon parents’ rights to make informed healthcare choices for their children and unfairly target transgender adolescents. Although litigation is ongoing, judges have issued temporary injunctions against these bans in Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Missouri, and Oklahoma and permanently blocked the ban in Arkansas.

Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights Jennifer Levi and Human Rights Campaign Litigation Director Cynthia Cheng-Wun Weaver

Last spring, GLAD helped secure a federal judge’s ruling in Alabama that blocked implementing the state’s criminal ban while the case moves forward. As we prepare for an anticipated trial, this injunction remains in effect.

In Florida, our motion for a preliminary injunction to halt the ban became more urgent when the state legislature passed SB 254 at the end of the session. This new law codifies the Boards of Medicine bans and adds criminal and civil penalties.

On June 6, a federal judge issued a strong ruling that blocks the enforcement of SB 254 and the Boards of Medicine rules for the plaintiff families, ensuring that their children can continue to access needed care.

The ruling also makes it clear that the law is unconstitutional and that the plaintiffs are likely to prevail once the Court issues a final ruling on the merits. It says powerfully that the ban violates parents’ rights to make medical decisions for their children and violates the equal protection rights of transgender people by denying them medically necessary, doctor-recommended healthcare.

Halting and overturning these harmful laws is crucial to safe-guarding access to essential healthcare and ensuring that parents of transgender youth can continue to provide guidance and support. It is also vital in countering the spread of misinformation, anti-LGBTQ+ legislation, and attacks on scientific knowledge and bodily autonomy, which aim to hinder progress.

“Our daughter is a happy, confident child, but this ban takes away our right to provide her with recommended healthcare.”

While LGBTQ+ community members and advocates are diligently working to halt these laws and provide support through mutual aid and information sharing, several states are also taking positive steps. As of May 2023, ten states—California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Vermont, and Washington— and the District of Columbia have enacted laws that protect transgender people’s access to healthcare. These laws include provisions to shield patients and providers from punitive measures in other states.

Additionally, bills addressing similar concerns are pending in Maine, Oregon, and elsewhere. These efforts reflect the widespread recognition of these healthcare bans for what they truly are: attacks on science, our families, our autonomy over our bodies, and our freedom and dignity. All of us — LGBTQ+ youth, adults, parents and families, supporters, and sensible policymakers — must join forces to reverse this backward trend and instead propel our nation toward greater liberation for all.

Visit www.GLAD.org for more on GLAD’s challenges to healthcare bans and other anti-LGBTQ+ laws and information on which states have passed healthcare shield laws. If you have questions about your situation or are experiencing issues with healthcare access, Kontakt GLAD Answers.

This story was originally published in the Summer 2023 GLAD Briefs newsletter. Mehr lesen.

Der Blog

Heim » National/Federal » Page 11

Meet Interimsgeschäftsführer Richard Burns

Lifelong LGBTQ+ Activist and GLAD Interim Executive Director Richard Burns Cites the Need for Vigilance in the Battle for Full LGBTQ+ Equality and Liberation

Richard, a cis white man with short gray and auburn hair, stands at a podium wearing a navy blue suit — The American LGBTQ Museum Groundbreaking Ceremony © Leandro Justen

As GLAD prepares to begin a robust national search for the leader who will steer the organization’s next chapter, the board is pleased to bring on lifelong LGBTQ+ activist Richard Burns as Interim Executive Director. Richard began his tenure on October 10.

“Leadership transitions are important milestones in any organization at any time,” says GLAD Board President Shane Dunn. “When the rights of LGBTQ+ people, and especially transgender people, are so virulently under attack across the country, and threats to our democracy are creating new barriers to our mission of realizing LGBTQ+, racial, HIV, and gender justice, we recognize an even greater responsibility to be thorough and thoughtful in this process.”

“We must have a commitment to vigilance, always. The battle for LGBTQ+ equality and liberation will go on for generations. We have to have heart. We have to have grit. We have to have resilience and hope.”
Richard Burns

“With significant leadership experience, including multiple tenures as an interim Executive Director, and a deep commitment to GLAD’s goals as an anti-racist, intergenerational legal advocacy organization, Richard will be able to support GLAD’s ongoing critical work with minimal disruption, allowing us the time to develop a careful search process and a diverse, talented, and passionate candidate pool for GLAD’s next permanent Executive Director,” Dunn adds.

Richard’s passion for justice and commitment to advancing equality has led him from Boston to New York and across the country as an advocate and organizational leader. He served more than twenty years as Executive Director of the New York City Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Community Center beginning at the height of the AIDS crisis, and later developed and led the LGBT Leadership Initiative previously housed at the Arcus Foundation.

In recent years, he has effectively steered several social and racial justice-focused organizations through transition periods as an interim ED, including the Drug Policy Alliance, the North Star Fund, the Funding Exchange, Funders for LGBTQ Issues, the Stonewall Community Foundation, Lambda Legal, and, most recently the Johnson Family Foundation. 

But “Boston formed me,” Richard says, speaking of his roots in the LGBTQ+ legal advocacy movement and, specifically, with GLAD.

In addition to co-founding the Massachusetts LGBTQ+ Bar Association and the Boston Lesbian & Gay Policy Alliance in 1982, he was president of GLAD’s founding board from 1978-1986 and has maintained his commitment to the organization for 45 years.

He talks of GLAD’s radical founding by John Ward at a time when movements for LGBTQ+, racial, and gender justice were converging, and new organizations began to spring up together to advance liberation for all people. On his first day of law school at Northeastern in 1980, Richard met the late Urvashi Vaid – long-time LGBTQ+ activist and a former GLAD Spirit of Justice honoree – who would become a lifelong friend, a GLAD colleague as an early legal intern, and an inspiration in conceptualizing revolutionary, inclusive queer liberation. Richard is chair of the founding Board of the American LGBTQ+ Museum, an in-development project co-founded by Urvashi, among others, to preserve, research, and share LGBTQ+ history and culture.

Kevin Cathcart, Richard Burns & Urvashi Vaid in front of Spiritus in Provincetown, late 1990’s

In the late 1970s, Richard was managing editor of the Boston-based national feminist, progressive LGBTQ+ newsweekly Gay Community News (GCN), which both chronicled and shaped intersectional queer activism at the time. GCN had an active early prison pen pal program, and Richard was a plaintiff in a successful lawsuit when the U.S. Bureau of Prisons declared GCN and another publication, the Task Force’s It’s Time, obscene and tried to block distribution to incarcerated individuals.

Richard also has the rare distinction of involvement with all three of our major LGBTQ+ legal organizations. In addition to his founding role with GLAD, Richard clerked at the National Center for Lesbian Rights while in law school and served on the board of Lambda Legal beginning in 1980.

In preparing to take on the Interim Director role at GLAD at this pivotal moment, Richard is clear that we must take lessons both from the early days of LGBTQ+ and AIDS activism and draw on the wisdom of today’s justice fighters – working with, and learning from, all movements for liberation.

“We all bring all of our identities with us everywhere. In order to build a just society, we’ve got to take into account all of our collective identities. We can’t leave anyone behind,” Richard says.

Recognizing that the far right has all of us in its sights–our movements for reproductive justice, racial equity, LGBTQ+ liberation, and beyond – he adds:

“We must have a commitment to vigilance, always. The battle for LGBTQ+ equality and liberation will go on for generations. We have to have heart. We have to have grit. We have to have resilience and hope.”

Opportunities to Meet GLAD’s Interim Executive Director:

Wednesday, October 25: Defining Gay Community News

Richard Burns will moderate a panel celebrating the 50^th anniversary of Gay Community News on Wednesday, October 25, 6 p.m., at the Massachusetts Historical Society. Visit the History Project for details.

Thursday, November 9: Spirit of Justice

Richard will speak at our annual Spirit of Justice Award Dinner. Visit www.GLAD.org/SOJ to join us.

Diese Geschichte wurde ursprünglich im GLAD Briefs Newsletter Herbst 2023 veröffentlicht. Mehr lesen.

Der Blog

Heim » National/Federal » Page 11

Defending Our Common Humanity

Far-right attacks are putting transgender youth and their families directly in harm’s way and putting all of us at risk. We are fighting back.

We all deserve to live and love freely and be supported and celebrated for who we are. The current onslaught of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is taking aim at those fundamental ideals, with devastating consequences for children, families, and all of us.

Since 2021, 22 states have passed transgender healthcare bans and 23 states have barred transgender kids as young as elementary school from playing school sports. Multiple states have passed some version of a “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law censoring teachers, schools, and students. Others have made it impossible for transgender and gender-diverse students to use the restroom at school.

A handful of states now require schools to out students to parents, a policy far-right groups are pushing for in the courts and local communities as well. Such policies interfere with teachers’ ability to support their students and to help ensure parents have the resources they need to support their LGBTQ+ children.

“We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.
– Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights

States are trying to ban drag shows and keep books about LGBTQ+ families out of school libraries.

The far right is advancing its anti-democratic agenda on the backs of transgender and LGBQ+ youth and adults. Fortunately, those of us who believe in freedom and our common humanity are fighting back.

GLAD is in the thick of the fight, directly challenging laws in Alabama, Florida, and New Hampshire, and supporting our partner organizations in other legal battles across the country.

In Alabama, we are challenging the criminal ban on medical care for transgender adolescents.

Last year, we presented two days of testimony in federal court from medical and scientific experts, transgender adolescents, and their parents. The Court concluded, as every other district court judge across the country to hear the facts since has, that there is no justifiable reason for the state to categorically ban access to safe, established, and necessary medical care simply because someone is transgender.

A panel of the 11^th Circuit Court of Appeals recently reversed the district court’s ruling. We are asking the full 11^th Circuit to reconsider the panel opinion and preserve the injunction barring the law from being enforced.

In Florida, where another district court also preliminarily blocked a law banning care for transgender adolescents, we are preparing for a full trial this December. We are also challenging restrictions put on transgender adults’ ability to obtain gender transition-related health care.

These laws target transgender people and put parents in the excruciating position of not being able to provide their adolescent children with the care they know they need to thrive.

As Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights and GLAD’s lead attorney in Alabama and Florida put it: “We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.”

In New Hampshire, we are challenging a school censorship law that chills teachers’ ability to talk to students honestly about race, disability, and LGBTQ+ identities.

Throughout New England we have worked overtime the past three sessions to stop the same harmful anti-LGBTQ+ bills we are seeing across the country.

That includes successfully defeating a bill last year that would have reversed New Hampshire’s ban on the debunked and dangerous practice of so-called conversion therapy. An attempt to challenge another state’s conversion therapy ban is pending consideration at the U.S. Supreme Court.

It can sometimes feel like these attacks came out of nowhere. But we know better. Our community has made tremendous progress over the past 20 years and the right is trying hard to reverse that.

Two decades ago, we began to see states passing express protections against discrimination for transgender people. Today, nearly half the states have such laws on the books.

We are fighting for our freedom, for our right to be ourselves, to live and love fully, and to celebrate our shared humanity. It’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.

Legal victories, educational research, and community advocacy have brought schools to a place of deeper understanding about the importance and fairness of supporting transgender students to express themselves and be respected for who they are.

The medical community has developed policies and practices to make safe and effective treatments for gender dysphoria more accessible. More and more families have the tools to understand and support their transgender children.

In 2020, the Supreme Court affirmed that discrimination on the basis of transgender status and sexual orientation is unlawful under federal law. And earlier this year, the Supreme Court declined to review a landmark ruling from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming that the Americans with Disabilities Act protects transgender people from disability discrimination.

Increased visibility and understanding of our lives and increased legal protections have all made it more possible for transgender and LGBQ+ people to fully participate in civic life – to live and love freely, to be embraced by families and integrated fully into our communities.

Now, a deliberate effort by influential politically motivated actors seeks to replace our shared humanity with fear and disinformation.

Our power lies in collective action—advocating in courts and in legislatures, and engaging at the ballot box, in grassroots activism, and in everyday conversations.

And the good news is – even now – when we fight, we can win.

Over 500 anti-LGBTQ+ bills were introduced across the country this year – and the vast, vast majority of those were defeated. When federal courts have had the chance to hear our full arguments and truly understand the impact of these laws on people’s lives, we’ve won. Far too many hostile bills have passed, to be sure. But we also can’t lose sight of how many we have defeated.

And while it sometimes seems like we are exclusively playing defense, we are also still advancing laws to protect our community.

This year, Michigan became the 23^rd state, along with DC and the U.S. Virgin Islands, to provide comprehensive nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people.

15 states have adopted “provider shield laws” that protect access to medical care for transgender people – GLAD worked with state partners to pass such laws in Massachusetts and Vermont, with more to come.

In Maine this year we helped pass a law that creates a pathway for 16- and 17-year-old transgender adolescents to get medical care in the extraordinary circumstances where a parent objects to care even though denying it results in harm.

Those who want to move us backward and put our community in harm’s way have a lot of power and resources, it’s true. We have our work cut out for us, and we know we won’t win every fight. But we are fighting for our freedom, for our right to be ourselves, to live and love fully, and to celebrate our shared humanity.

That’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.

Diese Geschichte wurde ursprünglich im GLAD Briefs Newsletter Herbst 2023 veröffentlicht. Mehr lesen.

Der Blog

Heim » National/Federal » Page 11

Protecting LGBTQ+ Students

Creating Safe and Inclusive Schools Together

All students deserve to feel safe and included at school and have an educational environment that welcomes and affirms their full identities.

Research demonstrates that such positive school climates are necessary for all youth to learn and thrive. For many LGBTQ+ students, this journey includes sharing their identity with their friends or a trusted teacher before they’re ready to do so at home. While most youth want to and do come out to their family in their own time, some are losing that choice. Far-right legal groups are challenging these positive school policies, and some states are enacting laws that would force faculty to contact students’ homes before the students are ready, under the guise of “parents’ rights.”

The past few years of intense political scrutiny and legislative attacks have taken a toll on young people’s mental health and led to trans and LGBQ youth experiencing increased harassment. And so-called “parents’ rights” bills have made it less safe for young people who can’t be their authentic selves with their families. Teachers care about their students and know that generally, kids do better when they can talk to their parents. But sadly, that’s not an option for some youth, leading them to feel isolated both at home and school. But we are fighting to protect alle youth, whether they cannot come out at home or need support to discuss their identities with their parents when they are ready.

These “forced outing” bills directly contradict schools’ responsibility to create a supportive educational environment. Federal constitutional protections and many state-based laws are in place to safeguard the rights of LGBTQ+ students. Nevertheless, even in states with explicit obligations to protect LGBTQ+ youth, a vocal minority is attempting to deny young people the autonomy to choose when and how to share their identities with their families.

In September, The First Circuit Court of Appeals heard Foote gegen die Stadt Ludlow, which centers on this issue. We submitted a friend-of-the-court brief with the Massachusetts Superintendent’s Association, sharing research that shows positive school climates and trusted relationships with adults are critical to academic success for all students.

“When teachers and other educators acknowledge and respect students, including their requested names and pronouns, that creates the safety that allows brain development and learning to flourish while also meeting the requirement of equal educational opportunity,” said Mary Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies, at the filing.

GLAD is committed to protecting students and ensuring schools can create positive, inclusive learning environments. But parents and allies can make an impact too.

In addition to supporting GLAD in this crucial work, you can advocate for the LGBTQ+ youth in your life by checking out our website’s school resources page. You’ll find information on LGBTQ+ student rights, bullying protections, and guidance for schools in every New England state and across the country. We’ve also included resources from our partners on inclusion for transgender students in school sports and all areas of academic life, how to advocate for positive school climates, resources for educators, and more.

Familiarizing yourself with these resources can help you advocate for youth and encourage schools to meet their responsibility to ensure equal education and safety for all students. Public schools and many private schools are legally obligated to act when students face bullying and other kinds of mistreatment or harassment so that all students can learn and thrive.

If you need further support, GLAD-Antworten can provide free and confidential legal information and assistance.

Diese Geschichte wurde ursprünglich im GLAD Briefs Newsletter Herbst 2023 veröffentlicht. Mehr lesen.

Der Blog

Heim » National/Federal » Page 11

Die Würde und Gleichheit aller Menschen

**Wir feiern 20 Jahre seit Goodridge gegen DPH Brachte die Freiheit zu heiraten nach Massachusetts und schließlich in die ganze Nation**

Ein Auszug dieses Artikels erscheint in der November/Dezember-Ausgabe 2023 von Bostoner Geist.

Vor zwanzig Jahren, am 18. November 2003, durchbrach der Oberste Gerichtshof von Massachusetts die historische Barriere für die Eheschließung von LGBTQ+-Personen in seinem wegweisenden Goodridge gegen das Gesundheitsministerium Massachusetts ist damit der erste Bundesstaat, der entschieden hat, dass die Freiheit zu heiraten oder nicht zu heiraten auch für LGBTQ+-Personen gelten muss. Dieses Urteil erforderte die Öffnung der Tür für legale Ehen innerhalb von sechs Monaten.

Mit den Worten von Mehrheitsmeinung der Vorsitzenden Richterin Margaret H. Marshall„Die Verfassung von Massachusetts bekräftigt die Würde und Gleichheit aller Menschen. Sie verbietet die Schaffung von Bürgern zweiter Klasse.“ Diese Würdigung der Verpflichtung, Intimität, Familie und Gegenseitigkeit in der Ehe wird weiterhin bei Hochzeitsfeiern in Massachusetts und weltweit zitiert.

GLAD eingereicht Goodridge im April 2001 im Namen von sieben Paaren, die etwas Einfaches und zugleich Tiefgreifendes forderten: die Achtung ihrer persönlichen Verpflichtung durch die Verfassung durch die Aufhebung des Verbots einer legalen Eheschließung und der damit verbundenen Schutz-, Rechte- und Pflichtenrechte.

Mit großer Dankbarkeit und in Anerkennung ihres bedeutenden Einflusses auf unsere Gemeinde, unseren Staat und unsere Nation freuten wir uns, die Goodridge Kläger als Preisträger des Spirit of Justice Award 2023 beim Spirit of Justice Dinner von GLAD.

Wir haben Gloria Bailey-Davies, Linda Bailey-Davies, Edward Balmelli, Maureen Brodoff, Gary Chalmers, Rob Compton, Hillary Goodridge, Julie Goodridge, Michael Horgan, Richard Linnell, Gina Nortonsmith, Heidi Nortonsmith, Ellen Wade und David Wilson geehrt.

Spirit of Justice Award Dinner graphic - blue with justice statue on right. Thurs Nov 9. Join the can't miss event for supporters of LGBTQ+ equality

Jeder von ihnen gab sich authentisch und baute Verbindungen und Brücken des Verständnisses mit der breiteren Gemeinschaft auf, selbst inmitten der medialen und politischen Aufmerksamkeit und der Konflikte. Sie setzten sich für die Gleichberechtigung aller in Massachusetts ein, und dieser Hoffnungsschimmer verbreitete sich weithin. Mit anderen Eheklägern, unter anderem in Klagen in Hawaii und Vermont, bevor Goodridgeund Fälle im ganzen Land nach, die Goodridge Der vollständige Sieg der Kläger ebnete den Weg für mehr.

Several people, the Goodridge plaintiffs, standing together in front of GLAD banner — *Goodridge* Kläger beim Spirit of Justice Award Dinner 2013 mit der geehrten Vorsitzenden Richterin Margaret H. Marshall und Mary Bonauto

Die Realität der Ehen in Massachusetts bereitete den Boden für die Abschaffung des Bundesgesetzes zur Verteidigung der Ehe – zunächst durch die Klage von GLAD im Jahr 2009 vor einem Bundesgericht und den einstimmigen Sieg 2012 vor dem First Circuit Court of Appeals. Anschließend wurde die Klage 2013 von anderen Klägern vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof durchgesetzt. Gemeindemitglieder und Organisationen, darunter GLAD, arbeiteten in Parlamenten und Gerichten in den gesamten USA zusammen. Im Jahr 2013 wurde GLAD gebeten, sich dem Team anzuschließen, das die Kläger in Michigan in dem Fall vertrat, der vor den Obersten Gerichtshof führen sollte. Obergefell Urteil zur Gleichstellung der Ehe im ganzen Land im Jahr 2015.

Rückblickend könnte man meinen, all dies sei unvermeidlich gewesen. Doch das ist weit gefehlt.

Es erforderte unermüdliche harte Arbeit, Engagement und Mut von den 14 Klägern, Anwälten, amici und ihren Anwälten und so vielen anderen. Die Goodridge Die Kläger verkrafteten eine – wie erwartet, aber dennoch enttäuschende – Niederlage vor Gericht und verdoppelten ihre Bemühungen, mit den Menschen in Kontakt zu treten und ihnen zu erklären, warum ihnen die Ehe wichtig ist.

Der Sieg war süß. Das wunderbare und bedeutsame Urteil des Obersten Gerichtshofs (SJC) vom 18. November 2003 war ein Triumph. Dennoch war es nicht das Ende. Die Reaktionen ließen nicht lange auf sich warten – sowohl der Ausbruch von Freude und Jubel als auch die Gegenreaktion.

Gleichzeitig debattierte die Legislative bei einem Verfassungskonvent darüber, ob die Ehe für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare verfassungsmäßig verboten oder das Urteil des Gerichts verteidigt werden sollte.

Überall waren Aufkleber mit der Aufschrift „Ich stehe hinter dem SJC“ zu sehen, und innerhalb und außerhalb des State House drängten sich Scharen von Unterstützern und Gegnern.

Inmitten all dessen handelten Paare aus dem einfachen Wunsch heraus, ihre – in manchen Fällen jahrzehntelange – Liebe und Verbundenheit zu bewahren, und planten Hochzeitsfeiern.

Schließlich brach der 17. Mai 2004 an mit Talkshows am frühen Morgen und LGBTQ+-Personen und Verbündeten, die Paare unterstützten, die in Städten und Gemeinden im gesamten Commonwealth heiraten wollten..

„Die Verfassung von Massachusetts bekräftigt die Würde und Gleichheit aller Menschen. Sie verbietet die Schaffung von Bürgern zweiter Klasse.“
– Oberste Richterin Margaret H. Marshall

Die Freude war greifbar, als Massachusetts – unter den Augen der ganzen Nation – die ersten gesetzlich anerkannten Ehen für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare im Land einführte.

Und dennoch gab es noch viel zu tun. Es gab zahlreiche weitere Sitzungen des Verfassungskonvents und Gerichtsverfahren über die erforderlichen Verfahren. Am wichtigsten war jedoch, dass die Bürger des Commonwealth mit ihren gewählten Amtsträgern, Nachbarn und Familienangehörigen in Kontakt traten.

Schließlich lehnte der Gesetzgeber den letzten Vorschlag zur Verfassungsänderung im Juni 2007 mit über drei Vierteln der Stimmen von Repräsentantenhaus und Senat endgültig ab. Der Commonwealth hatte sich an der Goodridge Klägern dabei, einen gemeinsamen Nenner und unsere gemeinsame Menschlichkeit zu finden.

Es war offiziell – die Ehegleichheit war nun in Massachusetts angekommen und sollte dauerhaft gelten.

Der Sieg vor Gericht und die unglaubliche Verteidigung, die die einfachen Leute in Massachusetts zu seiner Verteidigung leisteten, schufen eine Dynamik für die Gleichberechtigung, doch der nationale Fortschritt verlief immer noch erschreckend langsam.

Politiker, die Angst schüren und an die Macht kommen wollten, nutzten den Kampf unserer Gemeinschaft für grundlegende Menschenwürde und Menschenrechte – etwas, das wir heute erneut erleben. Landesgesetze wurden geändert, um die Ehe zu verbieten und jeglichen rechtlichen Schutz für die Beziehung eines Paares zu beseitigen. Feindselige Politiker lösten eine Welle von Verfassungsänderungen im ganzen Land aus.

Erst 2008 sicherte sich GLAD den nächsten nachhaltigen Gerichtssieg, und zwar vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof von Connecticut in Kerrigan und Mock gegen das Gesundheitsministerium. Wir feiern am 12. November in Connecticut unseren 15. Hochzeitstag, kurz vor dem 20.^th Jahrestag von Goodridge.

Nach Connecticut kam es vor den Gerichten und in der Legislative der Bundesstaaten zu immer mehr Erfolgen bei der Durchsetzung der Ehefreiheit.

Entscheidend Gesetzgebung Erfolge für die Ehegleichheit in den Neuenglandstaaten Vermont, Maine und New Hampshire bewiesen, dass wir nicht nur vor Gericht, sondern auch im demokratischen Prozess Veränderungen bewirken konnten. 2012 mussten wir in Maine erneut zur Abstimmung gehen. Maine war damit der erste Bundesstaat, der die Ehe durch Volksabstimmung durchsetzte. Anfang 2013 endete unsere Kampagne in Neuengland mit der Einführung der Ehe in Rhode Island.

Langsam, aber zunehmend spürbar, begannen immer mehr Menschen in der Öffentlichkeit, sich mit der Möglichkeit der Würde und Gleichberechtigung von LGBTQ+-Personen und unseren Beziehungen auseinanderzusetzen und diese dann auch zu akzeptieren.

Der Weg von einem Verfassungsgerichtsverfahren in Massachusetts zum nationalen Sieg in der Ehe Obergefell gegen Hodges am Obersten Gerichtshof im Jahr 2015 ist das Ergebnis des veränderten Denkens, der harten Arbeit, des Mutes, der Widerstandsfähigkeit und der Beharrlichkeit so vieler Menschen in Gesellschaft und Recht. Wie der Queer-Historiker George Chauncey es jedoch formulierte, gäbe es keine Obergefell ohne Goodridge, und wir feiern freudig die 14 wegweisenden Kläger, die den Weg geebnet haben.

Verankerung von Würde und Gleichheit im Bundesrecht 

President BIden signing the RMA surrounded by legislators, outside of the White House — Unterzeichnungszeremonie im Weißen Haus

Im Juni 2022 forderte der Richter des Obersten Gerichtshofs Clarence Thomas eine Neuüberlegung von Obergefell – und andere wichtige Fälle zum Schutz der individuellen Freiheiten – in seiner Zustimmung zu der Dobbs gegen Jackson – Frauengesundheit Ein Urteil, das 50 Jahre Präzedenzfälle zum Abtreibungsrecht aufhob. Es war weder das erste noch das letzte Mal, dass die Ehegleichheit direkt bedroht war. Es löste jedoch jahrelange Bemühungen aus, die Anerkennung von Ehen durch Bundesstaaten und Bund zu fordern und Diskriminierung aufgrund des Geschlechts, der Rasse oder der ethnischen Zugehörigkeit der Ehepartner zu verbieten. Mit überparteilicher Unterstützung unterzeichnete Präsident Biden im Dezember 2022 den bundesweiten „Respect for Marriage Act“, um LGBTQ+-Familien und anderen im ganzen Land die Gewissheit zu geben, dass ihre Ehen weiterhin von unseren Landes- und Bundesregierungen respektiert werden.

Es bedarf der Anstrengungen vieler, um den Lauf der Geschichte in Richtung Gerechtigkeit zu lenken. Auch heute noch werden Menschen in unserer Gemeinschaft an vielen Orten angegriffen. Die Arbeit geht weiter, aber sehen Sie, wie weit wir gekommen sind.
– Goodridge Klägerin Heidi Nortonsmith

Wir verfolgen aufmerksam die Bemühungen, die Gleichstellung der Zivilehe und die Gleichstellung von LGBTQ+-Personen im Allgemeinen zu untergraben. Dazu gehört auch die Schaffung von Einwänden aus sprachlichen und religiösen Gründen gegen die Grundregeln der Gleichbehandlung, wie in der knappen, aber besorgniserregenden Entscheidung des Obersten Gerichtshofs in diesem Sommer. 303 Kreativ Urteile und andere. Wir sehen es auch in den weit verbreiteten bundesstaatlichen Gesetzgebungsdrohungen gegen LGBTQ+-Personen, die Anspruch auf grundlegenden menschlichen oder rechtlichen Respekt erheben, sei es in Schulen, im Gesundheitswesen, auf öffentlichen Plätzen und in anderen Bereichen des täglichen Lebens. Unsere Gemeinschaft arbeitet Überstunden, um sich gegenseitig zu verteidigen und zu schützen und das zu bekräftigen, was wir in diesen extrem herausfordernden Zeiten als wahr und richtig erachten.

Auch wenn dieser Kampf hart ist, wissen wir, dass wir trotz Verlusten und Lücken im öffentlichen Verständnis kämpfen können, wie wir es bei der Ehe getan haben, bei Gesetzen, die Intimität kriminalisieren, bei der Reaktion unserer Gemeinschaft auf die HIV-Epidemie und bei den Fortschritten in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten bei den Rechten von Transgender-Personen. die nun mit verheerenden Gegenreaktionen konfrontiert sind. Es ist nie einfach oder geht sofort, aber wenn wir langfristig aus Liebe und Engagement zusammenarbeiten, gewinnen wir.

„Es bedarf der Anstrengungen vieler, um den Bogen der Geschichte in Richtung Gerechtigkeit zu lenken“, Goodridge Klägerin Heidi Nortonsmith sagte er bei der Unterzeichnungszeremonie des Respect for Marriage Act im Weißen Haus.Auch jetzt gibt es noch so viele Orte, an denen Menschen in unserer Gemeinschaft angegriffen werden. Die Arbeit geht weiter, aber sehen Sie, wie weit wir gekommen sind. Das Gesetz, das Präsident Biden heute unterzeichnet, wird die Menschen sicherer, geborgener und weniger allein machen. Von unserer Familie an Sie alle: Danke, dass Sie für unsere Menschlichkeit und Würde kämpfen. Für unser Recht zu lieben und geliebt zu werden. Und für unsere Ehe.

Unerledigte Aufgaben: Den Schutz unserer Familien gewährleisten

Selfie of MA parent with child smiling — MA-Elternteil Kam und ihr Sohn

Heute ist Massachusetts stolz auf seine Vorreiterrolle in der Ehegleichheit, und das zu Recht. Doch zwanzig Jahre nach dem Meilenstein Goodridge Mit diesem Urteil hat der Staat noch eine Aufgabe zu erfüllen: Er muss sicherstellen, dass LGBTQ+-Familien – einschließlich unserer Kinder – durch die rechtliche Verbindung mit ihren Eltern umfassend geschützt sind. Die Gesetze von Massachusetts zur Feststellung der Abstammung – der rechtlichen Beziehung zwischen einem Kind und seinen Eltern – sind Jahrzehnte veraltet. Infolgedessen sind Kinder aus LGBTQ+-Familien und andere Kinder, die durch künstliche Befruchtung geboren wurden, gefährdet, da ihre Verwandtschaftsbeziehung zu ihren Eltern nicht durch das Gesetz anerkannt wird. Der Gesetzgeber muss noch in diesem Jahr den Massachusetts Parentage Act verabschieden, um einen gesetzlichen Rahmen für den gleichermaßen Schutz aller Familien zu schaffen.

Diese Geschichte wurde ursprünglich im GLAD Briefs Newsletter Herbst 2023 veröffentlicht. Mehr lesen.

Der Blog

Heim » National/Federal » Page 11

Our Fight for LGBTQ+ Youth

We’ve been working together for decades to make sure LGBTQ+ youth have the support and freedom they need to be themselves and thrive as part of their communities.

From establishing the right for gay students to enjoy Prom with their boyfriend or girlfriend like any other kid, to making sure transgender students can participate in school on the same terms as everyone else, GLAD – and you – have worked alongside inspiring LGBTQ+ young people to imagine and create a better world.

Now, with new waves of attacks against LGBTQ+ youth, we must continue to protect the vision we share for a safer and more free future.

With your support, GLAD is:

Fighting to protect access to established medical care that helps transgender youth survive and thrive.

This week, we asked the full 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to preserve a federal district court decision blocking Alabama’s ban on healthcare for transgender youth.

As GLAD’s Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights, Jennifer Levi said:

“Enforcement of Alabama’s criminal transgender healthcare ban will harm thousands of transgender adolescents across Alabama and will put Alabama parents in the excruciating position of not being able to get the medical care their children need to thrive. We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.”

Defending supportive school policies that enable trans youth and all students to learn and grow.

Today, the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals is hearing an important case on whether schools can support transgender students even if some parents disagree. We submitted a friend of the court brief with the MA Superintendent’s Association, sharing research that shows positive school climates and trusted relationships with adults are critical to academic success for all students.

As Mary Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies, said:

“When teachers and other educators acknowledge and respect students, including their requested names and pronouns, that creates the safety that allows brain development and learning to flourish while also meeting the requirement of equal educational opportunity. Parents have a right to be involved in their children’s education, but parents and students have navigated these and other issues before without a new constitutional mandate of disclosure and can do so today.”

Ensuring students can learn about themselves and the world around them without bans on important topics like LGBTQ+ identities, race, and racism.

Last month, GLAD and our partners asked a federal district court in New Hampshire to declare the state’s harmful “Banned Concepts” law unconstitutional.

As GLAD Attorney Chris Erchull said:

“Public school teachers work hard every day to ensure students can develop the knowledge and critical thinking skills they need to be successful and contribute to their communities. Teachers can’t do that effectively when they are subject to this vague law, with no guidance, that forces them to limit class discussions and avoid certain important topics altogether. LGBTQ+, BIPOC, and students with disabilities are being especially harmed, but the chilling effect of this law is doing a severe disservice to all students, when their teachers can’t ensure they gain a full, rich understanding of history and the people and world around them.”

With your help, GLAD will never stop working to support LGBTQ+ youth and secure a better future for all of us.

Support this important work

Nachricht

Heim » National/Federal » Page 11

GLAD Cheers Federal Department of Health and Human Services Move to Strengthen Non-discrimination Protections for LGBTQ+ People Accessing Vital Programs

GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) is pleased that the Biden Administration has moved to prevent discrimination against LGBTQ+ people in important social services programs funded by the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

“At a time when many state legislatures are working overtime to prevent LGBTQ+ people—particularly transgender people—from accessing health care and essential services, we appreciate the Biden Administration’s move to clearly ensure protection for the constitutional rights of LGBTQ+ people and their families to receive services they need to maintain their health and well-being,” said Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders.

Nachricht

Heim » National/Federal » Page 11

Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in 303 Creative v. Elenis

In a 6-3 ruling today the U.S. Supreme Court issued a highly fact-specific decision authorizing a narrow exception to a state nondiscrimination law for a website developer whose work it found involves selecting customers to convey the designer’s message. While the case allows for the first time a limited First Amendment exemption from laws requiring businesses open to the public to offer the goods and services they sell without discrimination, the unusual nature of the transaction in the case suggests the ruling has virtually no application to the overwhelming majority of businesses providing goods and services to the public.

Based on the facts agreed upon by the parties, the Court found that the seller vets and endorses each client, meets with the couple to discuss “unique” stories, creates original artwork, designs and text for each, and explicitly expresses her support for their wedding. All of this, the Court said, pointed to the “expressive” nature of her conduct and justied a narrow exception to the nondiscrimination law. This is different from virtually all businesses that sell goods and services to the public and does not reflect how the overwhelming majority of companies operate.

Mary Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, issued the following statement:

“While today’s ruling is extremely limited, we are disappointed to see that for the first time, and in the context of LGBTQ+ people who are already facing a “heartbreaking” “backlash to the movement for liberty and equality for gender and sexual minorities,” as the dissent noted, an unprecedented exemption to nondiscrimination laws that have always been considered to forbid conduct, not speech. This is not the broad victory Lorie Smith and her counsel sought – today’s ruling importantly upholds the validity of nondiscrimination laws, including for LGBTQ+ people who may obtain goods and services ‘on the same terms offered to other members of the public’ – but it is not the end of efforts to push LGBTQ+ people and couples into a second class status. GLAD and our movement will resist that effort every step of the way.

For decades, case law and public agreement have upheld the principle that nondiscrimination laws are bound up with first principles of equality, with mutual respect and civic unity, and with our need for goods and services no matter who and where we are. It is crucial to ensure today’s ruling remains limited to the highly specific and customized services the Court found in this case, and is not seen as a green light to assert a free speech defense in other areas of law. Denying services to same-sex couples is out of step with what the vast majority of Americans believe, and the overwhelming majority of Americans, including business owners, strive to treat everyone with dignity and respect as they too want to be treated. Today’s decision from the Supreme Court does not change that.

LGBTQ+ people are family members, co-workers, business owners, and customers in every community and we remain committed to working alongside our neighbors to ensure all people can go about our daily lives and access the goods and services we need without discrimination. As Justice Kennedy summarized for several of the current justices in Masterpiece Cakeshop just 5 years ago, ‘religious and philosophical objections of business owners and other actors in the economy and in society” do not suffice to ‘deny protected persons equal access to goods and services” under public accommodations laws like Colorado’s.’ We will fight to maintain that principle for alle of the people protected by nondiscrimination laws.”

GLAD submitted a friend of the Court brief in this case for GLAD, NCLR, Lambda Legal, HRC, The Task Force, and thanks White & Case for its assistance.

Besuchen Sie die 303 Creative v. Elenis case page.

Nachricht

Heim » National/Federal » Page 11

Statement of Janson Wu, Executive Director of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, on the Supreme Court’s Ruling on Affirmative Action in College Admissions

„Today’s majority opinion ending the consideration of race as one of many factors for qualified students in college admissions ignores the substantial factual record supporting the lawfulness of Harvard and University of North Carolina’s admissions programs and discounts present and past racial inequities the 14thAmendment to our constitution was intended to address. Equal educational opportunities are fundamental to reducing barriers to economic, leadership, and other life opportunities, to ensuring full participation and a diversity of perspectives in a robust, multi-racial democracy, and to realizing freedom for all.

The benefits that accrue to all students from being able to learn from others of different perspectives and experiences, and to build respect for one another, cannot be overstated. I attended Harvard College as an Asian-American student in the late 1990s. Coming from a predominantly white community in rural upstate New York, the racial diversity of students and backgrounds opened a new world of experiences and relationships that led to greater growth, learning, and discovery.

Today’s decision will make it harder for colleges and universities to provide that same learning environment that benefited me and all students, including Asian-American students – but we cannot and will not turn our backs on that goal.

As Justice Jackson plainly put it in her dissent in the North Carolina case: The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together, collectively striving to achieve true equality for all Americans.

While the Court has spoken as to admissions, it remains true that life experiences, including those related to a person’s race, are matters that can be lifted up by prospective students and sought and considered by educational institutions in line with their missions. We must and will keep working together to ensure every student has the opportunity to pursue their dreams.”

Erfahren Sie mehr über den Fall.

Nachricht

Heim » National/Federal » Page 11

HIV Medicine Association and National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors Warn of Tens of Thousands of New HIV Cases and Billions in Health Care Costs if Decision in Braidwood gegen Becerra is Allowed to Stand

The organizations, which represent thousands of healthcare providers, public officials, and policy experts with expertise in the treatment and prevention of HIV and the demographics and dynamics of the epidemic, filed a friend-of-the-court brief today in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

The HIV Medicine Association (HIVMA) and the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD) today filed a amicus curiae Schriftsatz at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, urging reversal of the federal district court order in Braidwood gegen Becerra. That ruling blocked a requirement under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that insurers cover designated preventive care services, including HIV PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis), without cost sharing. HIV PrEP is an extraordinary medical breakthrough that reduces the risk of HIV transmission by close to one hundred percent.

The brief was authored by attorneys at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders and the law firm Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

NASTAD and HIVMA include thousands of physicians and other healthcare providers with expertise in the treatment and prevention of HIV; government public officials from every state responsible for stopping the epidemic; and policy experts who understand the demographics and dynamics of the epidemic. Their brief lays out critical information demonstrating how requiring copays and deductibles for PrEP will significantly decrease utilization of PrEP, cause tens of thousands of new and preventable HIV cases, with billions of dollars in associated healthcare costs, and reverse the progress our nation has made towards curbing, and ultimately ending, the HIV epidemic.

“As an organization representing thousands of physicians and other health care professionals working on the frontlines of the HIV epidemic in communities across the country, we are deeply concerned about the harmful and far-reaching impacts this decision will have if allowed to stand,” said Michelle Cespedes, MD, MS, Chair, HIVMA. “Reinstating cost-sharing for PrEP would directly cause tens of thousands of preventable cases of HIV transmission and set back decades of progress toward curbing the epidemic.”

While the ruling from the Texas court in Braidwood gegen Becerra broadly enjoined the cost-sharing mandate for all recommended preventive services, the case began as a challenge specifically to the requirement to cover PrEP without copays or deductibles. The brief filed today provides the Court of Appeals with important historical and current-day information about the tremendous toll the HIV epidemic has had on millions of lives, as well as the role discrimination and stigma have played in preventing Americans from accessing highly effective prevention and treatment.

“The Braidwood decision is rooted in stigma and bigotry towards the LGBTQ+ community and people vulnerable to HIV,” said Dr. Stephen Lee, NASTAD Executive Director. “It will cause incalculable harm to our efforts to end the HIV epidemic. We are pleased to join HIVMA in filing an amicus brief to help offer insight into why this decision is so detrimental to our HIV/AIDS public health system.”

The brief cites a recent epidemiological analysis conducted by experts at Harvard and Yale predicting, under the most cautious and conservative estimates, that blocking the ACA’s no cost sharing provision for PrEP will result in an additional 2,057 HIV infections in the first year alone. Including an additional predicted 1,892 secondary infections brings that number to 3,949 people with HIV in just the first year, which will cost the healthcare system a staggering $1.66 billion. Extending that conservative model just five years into the future predicts approximately an additional 20,000 people with HIV and costs to the United States healthcare system of over $8 billion as a result of the reimposition of barriers to accessing PrEP.

The brief also describes the sobering and unacceptable racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in both the impact of the epidemic and access to PrEP. In 2021, the CDC estimates that only 11% of Black people and 20% of Hispanic/Latino people who could benefit from PrEP were prescribed it, as opposed to 78% of White people. In the same year, more than half (52%) of new HIV infections were in the U.S. South, yet the states with the highest unmet need for PrEP are Alabama, Arkansas, South Carolina, and Mississippi.

“Copays and deductibles deter people from accessing healthcare,” said Ben Klein, Senior Director of Litigation and HIV Law at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. “PrEP is nearly 100% effective at preventing transmission of HIV but it is already underutilized, particularly among Black and Latino communities. As the brief filed today by HIVMA and NASTAD demonstrates, allowing the lower court’s ruling in Braidwood gegen Becerra to stand will exacerbate racial health disparities, increase new HIV diagnoses by the tens of thousands, and have devastating consequences on our efforts to end the epidemic. GLAD is pleased to partner with the HIVMA, NASTAD, and the law firm Mintz to ensure that the Court of Appeals understands the devastating consequences for HIV prevention if the District Court’s decision stands.”

“The brief filed today by HIVMA and NASTAD underscores the fact that tens of thousands of American lives and billions of dollars of healthcare costs are literally in the balance with the outcome of this case,” said Drew DeVoogd, Member, Mintz. “Mintz is happy to work with GLAD, HIVMA, and NASTAD to highlight the massive human harm and economic cost the District Court’s decision will have if it is allowed to stand, eroding many years of hard-won public health progress in the fight against the HIV epidemic.”

Lesen Sie die Kurzbeschreibung