(Washington, DC, October 6, 2014)—The United States Supreme Court today declined to review the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision striking down Utah’s marriage ban for same-sex couples, thereby permitting that decision to stand, as well as a similar decision from Oklahoma. The Court also denied review of decisions by the Fourth and Seventh Circuit Courts of Appeals, which had struck down marriage bans in Virginia, Indiana, and Wisconsin.

By denying review of the Kitchen v. Herbert case, the Court let stand the June 2014 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit that found Utah’s ban on marriages by same-sex couples unconstitutional. Today’s decision means that same-sex couples in Utah, Oklahoma, Colorado, Kansas and Wyoming—all in the Tenth Circuit—have a constitutionally protected right to marry and to have their marriages treated equally.

The plaintiff couples in the Utah case are Kody Partridge and Laurie Wood, Derek Kitchen and Moudi Sbeity, and Kate Call and Karen Archer. The couples are represented by Peggy Tomsic of the Salt Lake City law firm Magleby & Greenwood, P.C., Shannon Minter of the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), Mary Bonauto of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), and former acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal Katyal of the law firm Hogan Lovells.

“We are thrilled by today’s decision, which means that same-sex couples are now equal citizens of this state,” said Derek Kitchen. “We are honored to be part of this historic moment and to know that as a result of today’s decision by the Supreme Court, never again will same-sex couples and their families be subjected to the discrimination and indignity that has caused so much harm to so many children and families over the years in Utah. This is a great day, and we are grateful to everyone who worked so hard to make it possible.”

“The Supreme Court’s decision today is a long-awaited victory not only for the courageous couples who brought this case, but for the entire state,” said Tomsic. “By allowing the Tenth Circuit’s ruling to stand, the Supreme Court has ensured that same-sex couples and their families in Utah will be treated equally and can have the same protection and stability that other families enjoy.”

Minter, who serves as NCLR legal director, said: “This is a huge step forward for Utah and the entire country. We are hopeful that the other cases pending across the country will also vindicate the freedom to marry so that all couples, no matter where they travel or live, will be treated as equal citizens and have the same basic security and protections for their families that other Americans enjoy.”

Added Bonauto: “This is fantastic news for the citizens of Utah and the 10 other states who are no longer denied the ability to marry or respect for their marriages.  It is also a powerful signal to the many other courts considering the issue that there is no reason to delay and perpetuate the harms to same-sex couples around the nation.”

Kitchen was the first federal district court victory in a marriage equality case after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. Windsor, and the first such victory in a federal court of appeals. Since then, three other federal appeals courts also ruled in favor of the freedom to marry for same-sex couples.

In a letter to Congress on September 4, 2013, Attorney General Eric Holder angekündigt that President Obama has directed the Executive Branc to take steps allowing for same-sex spouses of military veterans to collect federal benefits.

The Attorney General’s letter to Congress can be found Hier.

Kläger im Fall der Ehegleichheit in Utah bitten den Obersten Gerichtshof der USA um Überprüfung des Falls

Update 4. September 2014: Drei unterschiedliche Stimmen – die der Wirtschaft, der Staaten sowie der Familien- und Gleichstellungsgruppen – abgelegt amici curiae Slips in der Küche gegen Herbert FallIn den Schriftsätzen wird argumentiert, dass das Oberste Gericht einen oder mehrere Fälle annehmen sollte, um den durch Heiratsverbote verursachten Schaden und die Diskriminierung zu beheben.

Originalgeschichte:

Heute haben die drei Paare, die das Eheverbot für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare im US-Bundesstaat Utah anfechten, den Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten gebeten, dem Antrag der Behörden des Bundesstaates Utah stattzugeben und den Fall zu prüfen. In der heute eingereichten StellungnahmeDie Kläger argumentieren, dass eine Überprüfung durch den Obersten Gerichtshof erforderlich sei, da gleichgeschlechtliche Paare in Utah und im ganzen Land dringend die Sicherheit der Ehe benötigen, egal wo sie arbeiten oder reisen, um sich und ihre Familien umfassend zu schützen. In der Klageschrift wird argumentiert, dass nur eine Entscheidung des Obersten Gerichtshofs, die ihr Recht auf Heirat und die landesweite Anerkennung ihrer Ehe bestätigt, diese grundlegende Ungleichheit beseitigen kann.

Die klagenden Paare – Kody Partridge und Laurie Wood, Derek Kitchen und Moudi Sbeity sowie Kate Call und Karen Archer – argumentieren, dass die Gesetze der Bundesstaaten, die die Ehe für alle verbieten, gegen die in der US-Verfassung verankerten Garantien für Gleichbehandlung und ein faires Verfahren verstoßen. Die Paare, die vor den unteren Bundesgerichten positive Entscheidungen erwirkten, baten den Obersten Gerichtshof um eine Überprüfung des Falls, da die Ehen gleichgeschlechtlicher Paare nur dann wirklich gleichberechtigt seien, wenn sie im ganzen Land respektiert würden.

In ihrem Antrag erklären die Paare: „In diesem Fall geht es um die Freiheit einer ganzen Gruppe von Amerikanern, die dringend ein Urteil dieses Gerichts benötigen, das ihnen die Eheschließung und die Anerkennung ihrer Ehen auf gleicher Basis wie anderen Bürgern ermöglicht. Im vergangenen Jahr haben untere Gerichte im ganzen Land richtigerweise festgestellt, dass Landesgesetze, die gleichgeschlechtlichen Paaren die Eheschließung verbieten, gegen die Verfassung verstoßen. Da diese Urteile jedoch nicht landesweit gelten, sind gleichgeschlechtliche Paare weiterhin großer Unsicherheit und ernsthaften Problemen ausgesetzt. Sie können ihre eigene Zukunft und die ihrer Kinder nicht in der Gewissheit planen, dass ihnen die Staaten bei einem Umzug oder einer Reise die rechtliche Anerkennung ihrer familiären Beziehungen nicht entziehen können.“

Die Paare in dem Fall –Küche gegen Herbert– werden vertreten durch die leitende Rechtsberaterin Peggy Tomsic von der Anwaltskanzlei Magleby & Greenwood, PC in Salt Lake City, Shannon Minter vom National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), Mary Bonauto von Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) und den ehemaligen amtierenden Solicitor General Neal Katyal von der Anwaltskanzlei Hogan Lovells.

Mehr lesen

GLAD Civil Rights Project Director Mary Bonauto and Legal Director Gary Buseck have joined colleagues at the Nationales Zentrum für Lesbenrechte (NCLR) and Utah attorney Peggy Tomsic as counsel in their historic federal case representing same-sex couples seeking the freedom to marry in Utah.

Thanks to the Küche gegen Herbert legal team’s adept strategy and tireless advocacy, the Utah case was the first federal district court victory striking down a state marriage ban since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down DOMA. It was also the first victory in a federal court of appeals.

And, it is now the first post-DOMA freedom to marry case that the U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to review.

“We are thrilled to work with our friends and colleagues at NCLR on this important case,” says Buseck. “GLAD has a long history of collaborating with NCLR, and we have enormous respect for their legal acumen and determination.”

Among countless other legal victories on behalf of the LGBT community, NCLR played a leading role in making California the second state in the country to win the freedom to marry, in 2008. Legal Director Shannon Minter argued the case in the California Supreme Court, which ruled that the California Constitution guarantees equal dignity to same-sex couples and their families, including the freedom to marry.

“We are also thrilled to be working shoulder to shoulder with lead counsel Peggy Tomsic of the Salt Lake City law firm of Magleby & Greenwood, P.C. who first filed and has so strategically handled this case,” Buseck adds.” Likewise, we are excited about working with the committed Supreme Court experts at the D.C. firm of Hogan Lovells.”

“The Kitchen team offers unparalleled experience and knowledge as the case heads to the Supreme Court for consideration. We hope to use what we’ve learned in our work for the freedom to marry across New England, and as part of the decades-long team effort to develop a national marriage strategy, to bring value to the Utah case and help bring marriage equality to every American.”

Want to Support This Work?

Your gift today will support GLAD’s work on this historic marriage case, and all our work for equal justice under law for the LGBT community and people living with HIV. Thank you!