Noticias
GLAD Law and NCLR Respond to the Escarcha Sentencia de la Corte Suprema
“The Court today failed to do its job. It chose to look away, abandoning both vulnerable children and the parents who love them. No parent should be forced to watch their child suffer while proven medical care sits beyond their reach because of politics.”
WASHINGTON, DC—The Supreme Court of the United States today issued its ruling en Estados Unidos contra Skrmetti, upholding Tennessee’s ban on healthcare for transgender youth.
Today’s decision has no impact in states where health care for transgender youth is not currently banned.
Every major medical association including the Asociación Médica de Estados Unidos y el Asociacion Americana de Psicologia support this care, backed by decades of research and relying upon the same safe and effective medications used to treat a range of other health issues for children and adults. Last month, in the most comprehensive review to date, a new 1,000+ report commissioned by the Utah Legislature found that this care is supported by substantial evidence, is safe and effective, and reduces risk of suicidality.
Director Senior de Derechos Transgénero y Queer de GLAD Law Jennifer Levi y National Center for LGBTQ Rights Legal Director Shannon Minter, both of whom have more than 30 years each of LGBTQ+ impact litigation experience, including on transgender health care cases, and are themselves transgender, responded to today’s Supreme Court ruling:
“The Court today failed to do its job,” said Jennifer Levi, directora sénior de derechos transgénero y queer de GLAD Law.When the political system breaks down and legislatures bow to popular hostility, the judiciary must be the Constitution’s backbone. Instead, it chose to look away, abandoning both vulnerable children and the parents who love them. No parent should be forced to watch their child suffer while proven medical care sits beyond their reach because of politics.”
“The Court’s ruling abandons transgender youth and their families to political attacks. It ignored clear discrimination and disregarded its own legal precedent by letting lawmakers target young people for being transgender,” said National Center for LGBTQ Rights Legal Director Shannon Minter. “Healthcare decisions belong with families, not politicians. This decision will cause real harm.”
The Supreme Court’s ruling sends a dangerous message that these discriminatory laws can remain in effect while challenges proceed. Already, similar laws have passed or been proposed in over 20 states, creating a patchwork of legality that leaves many families in fear and uncertainty.
This ruling paves the way for a broader wave of anti-transgender legislation and executive action, bolstered by President Trump’s return to office and multiple executive orders targeting transgender people, including efforts to eliminate federal recognition of gender identity, restrict access to healthcare, and ban transgender students from sports and public school inclusion. Combined with the Court’s ruling, these actions intensify the hostile legal landscape facing transgender youth and their families.
This moment highlights an urgent need for federal courts to uphold the rights of all youth to access necessary medical care and the right to exist, free from discrimination.
Español de México