
Crandall v. Boston Concession Group
Statut: Victoire
GLAD won a ruling that Massachusetts non-discrimination law applies equally to every employee of Massachusetts companies, even if the employee works out-of-state. GLAD represented two women from Maine who worked in Maine and were essentially terminated after their employers learned they were lesbians. Our clients filed a complaint at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) under the Massachusetts non-discrimination law because their former employer was a Massachusetts-based company. After the MCAD dismissed our clients’ claim for lack of jurisdiction because the events occurred in Maine, GLAD appealed to Suffolk Superior Court. The Superior Court denied motions to dismiss by the MCAD and the employer, and the MCAD then agreed to reverse its position and announced that it would hear claims brought by out-of-state employees against in-state employers. The employer also negotiated a settlement with our clients.
Contenu connexe
-
Élargir la portée de GLAD Answers
En savoir plusNotre ligne d'information juridique GLAD Answers s'efforce d'aider autant de personnes que possible à travers la Nouvelle-Angleterre.
-
La nouvelle loi sur l'adoption confirmative du Maine renforce la sécurité des familles LGBTQ+
En savoir plusLa nouvelle loi offre des protections essentielles aux familles LGBTQ+ qui reflètent l'engagement de longue date du Maine à protéger tous les enfants.
-
Familles LGBTQ+ en danger : mise à jour des lois sur la filiation pour protéger les parents LGBTQ+ et leurs enfants
En savoir plusGLAD dirige les efforts visant à faire adopter la loi sur la filiation du Massachusetts et à protéger les familles LGBTQ+ à travers le pays.