
Stockman v. Trump
Statut: Victoire
GLAD and NCLR are co-counsel in Equality California‘s lawsuit challenging the transgender military ban, Stockman contre Trump. Equality California is a plaintiff in the suit together with seven individual plaintiffs who are currently serving or have taken steps to enlist.
The three organizations filed a motion for preliminary injunction on October 2, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for Central California to immediately stop the ban and prevent “further irreparable harm” to transgender Americans who are currently serving in the military or have been barred from enlisting. GLAD and NCLR previously filed a motion for preliminary injunction in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Doe c. Trump, the first of four lawsuits across the country filed against the Trump Administration’s transgender military ban.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion to dismiss and a motion opposing emergency relief in Stockman contre Trump on October 23. GLAD, EQCA, and NCLR slammed the government’s response for ignoring the harms this dangerous policy is inflicting on our nation’s service members and transgender individuals who want to enlist but can’t. En savoir plus.
Plaintiffs filed a response to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss on November 6. A hearing was scheduled in Stockman contre Trump on November 20.
On April 25, 2018, GLAD and NCLR filed our opposition to a Trump-Pence Administration request to dissolve the nationwide preliminary injunction that U.S. District Court Judge Jesus G. Bernal issued on December 22, 2017.
On September 18, 2018, Judge Bernal refusé the Government’s motion to dissolve the nationwide preliminary injunction.
Also see www.notransmilitaryban.org for the latest information.
LIST OF CASE DOCUMENTS
Briefs
- Stockman contre Trump filed complaint
- Requête en injonction préliminaire
- State of California Motion to Intervene, November 8, 2017
Filing November 6, 2017
- Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
- Supplemental Declarations November 6, 2017:
- Supplemental Declaration of Eric K. Fanning
- Supplemental Declaration of Raymond Edwin Maybus
- Supplemental Declaration of Deborah Lee James
- Supplemental Declaration of George Richard BrownMD
- Declaration of Mark J. Etelberg, Professor Emeritus at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California
- Supplemental Declaration of John Doe 1
- Supplemental Declaration of John Doe 2
Original Supporting Declarations
Plaintiffs:
Former Top Military Leaders:
- Retired Admiral and Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen
- Former United States Secretary of the Army Eric Fanning
- Former United States Secretary of the Navy Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr.
- Former Secretary of the United States Air Force Deborah Lee James
- Former Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Brad Rogers Carson
- Former Deputy Surgeon General for Mobilization, Readiness, and Army Reserve Affairs Margaret Chamberlain Wilmoth
Medical Expert:
Government’s Response
Contenu connexe
-
Le dossier de la Résistance : Le monde a changé
En savoir plusUne réflexion sur la première année en tant que directeur exécutif de GLAD Law, les victoires, le soutien du personnel et le chemin à parcourir dans la lutte pour la justice.
-
Premier jour et tous les jours depuis : la défense acharnée des personnes LGBTQ+ par GLAD Law
En savoir plusFace aux décrets exécutifs anti-LGBTQ+ de grande ampleur, nous avons immédiatement pris des mesures juridiques pour arrêter, retarder et réduire les dommages.
-
Le dossier de la résistance : Le cœur du Texas est profond
En savoir plusAu milieu du chagrin et de la dévastation, j’ai trouvé l’espoir dans l’esprit durable du Texas et la conviction que la compassion collective peut encore façonner une Amérique plus juste.