National/Federal Know Your Rights - Page 54 of 59 - GLAD Law
Accéder au contenu
GLAD Logo Passer à la navigation principale vers le contenu

Nouvelles

Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders a le plaisir d'annoncer l'arrivée de Zack M. Paakkonen, avocat au sein de l'équipe. Ce dernier se concentrera sur les problématiques juridiques rencontrées par la communauté transgenre dans le cadre du projet « Droits des personnes transgenres » de GLAD. M. Paakkonen rejoindra l'équipe juridique le 3 septembre.

« Alors qu'il reste encore beaucoup à faire pour garantir l'égalité juridique et sociale des personnes transgenres, Zack Paakkonen est un atout précieux pour notre équipe juridique », a déclaré le directeur juridique Gary Buseck. « Fort de son expérience de défenseur des droits des personnes transgenres, tant au tribunal qu'en dehors, il est prêt à se lancer immédiatement dans la poursuite par GLAD de son travail de pointe sur les questions juridiques liées à la transsexualité. »

Paakkonen apporte à GLAD une solide expérience en matière de défense des droits des personnes transgenres dans divers contextes. En 2008, il a fondé, avec sa partenaire Alice Neal, West End Legal, LLC, à Portland, dans le Maine, un cabinet d'avocats généralistes spécialisé dans les besoins de la communauté LGBT locale. Parmi ses activités, Paakkonen a représenté des clients transgenres en droit de la famille et autres affaires successorales, les a conseillés sur les questions de discrimination à l'école et à l'emploi, a traité des dossiers impliquant des jeunes dans divers contextes et a défendu les droits des personnes transgenres au sein du système pénal et auprès des administrations publiques sur des questions de politique publique.

« Bien que je sois fier du travail que j'ai accompli pour la communauté transgenre en pratique privée, je suis enthousiasmé par l'opportunité que GLAD m'offre d'avoir un impact plus large sur l'amélioration et l'élargissement des protections juridiques pour la communauté transgenre en Nouvelle-Angleterre et à travers le pays », a déclaré Paakkonen.

Lire la suite ici

Nouvelles

Yesterday, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law the School Success and Opportunity Act (AB1266), ensuring that transgender students can fully access all school activities, sports teams, programs and facilities – including sex- segregated bathrooms and locker rooms – that match their gender identity.

The Massachusetts Transgender Equal Rights Coalition, which is working in Massachusetts for the passage of the Transgender Equal Access Bill, issued the following comments in response to the enactment of the California Law:

“We applaud Governor Brown and the state of California for taking this critical step to ensure that transgender youth have their gender identities affirmed and respected at school, and that they have the same opportunities as the rest of their classmates to play sports, participate in physical education classes, school clubs and attend field trips,” said Mason Dunn, executive director of the Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition. “Ensuring that transgender students can access sex-segregated facilities and programs consistent with their gender identity is simple and fair, and increasingly becoming the norm, as we saw in Massachusetts when the Department of Elementary and Secondary education released its guidance on supporting transgender students in the Commonwealth’s schools.”

“But while Massachusetts has taken important steps to treat transgender students fairly in our public schools, it remains that transgender young people and adults can still be refused access to public places like hospitals, restaurants, homeless shelters, nursing homes and supermarkets,” added Dunn. “Our legislature can correct this injustice by passing the Equal Access Bill so that transgender residents of the Commonwealth have the same access to vital services and public spaces their fellow residents enjoy.”

Read more about the Coalition and their full statement here.

Nouvelles

Boston, MA – Yesterday, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law the School Success and Opportunity Act (AB1266), ensuring that transgender students can fully access all school activities, sports teams, programs and facilities – including sex- segregated bathrooms and locker rooms – that match their gender identity.

The Massachusetts Transgender Equal Rights Coalition, which is working in Massachusetts for the passage of the Transgender Equal Access Bill, issued the following comments in response to the enactment of the California Law:

“We applaud Governor Brown and the state of California for taking this critical step to ensure that transgender youth have their gender identities affirmed and respected at school, and that they have the same opportunities as the rest of their classmates to play sports, participate in physical education classes, school clubs and attend field trips,” said Mason Dunn, executive director of the Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition. “Ensuring that transgender students can access sex-segregated facilities and programs consistent with their gender identity is simple and fair, and increasingly becoming the norm, as we saw in Massachusetts when the Department of Elementary and Secondary education released its guidance on supporting transgender students in the Commonwealth’s schools.”

“But while Massachusetts has taken important steps to treat transgender students fairly in our public schools, it remains that transgender young people and adults can still be refused access to public places like hospitals, restaurants, homeless shelters, nursing homes and supermarkets,” added Dunn. “Our legislature can correct this injustice by passing the Equal Access Bill so that transgender residents of the Commonwealth have the same access to vital services and public spaces their fellow residents enjoy.”
“We commend Gov. Brown and the California Legislature for affirming the dignity of transgender youth and for their leadership on issues of transgender equality.” said Kara Suffredini, executive director of MassEquality. “We hope that Massachusetts lawmakers will follow their lead by passing the Equal Access Bill so that all residents of the Commonwealth, including transgender residents, can access our public spaces safely and without fear of discrimination or other unfair treatment.”
###

About the Transgender Equal Rights Coalition
The Transgender Equal Rights Coalition is working to pass H. 1589/S. 643, “An Act relative to equal access in hospitals, public transportation, nursing homes, supermarkets, retail establishments, and all other places open to the public. Also known as the Equal Access Bill, this legislation would add protections based on gender identity to existing Massachusetts’ civil rights laws governing public accommodations, which currently prohibit discrimination on the basis of religious affiliation or belief, race, sex, sexual orientation, nationality, or any physical or mental disability. Gender identity is defined as “a person’s gender-related identity, appearance or behavior, whether or not that gender-related identity, appearance or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with the person’s physiology or assigned sex at birth.” Members of the coalition include: Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition; MassEquality; Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders; National Association of Social Workers, MA; Mass Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus; National Organization for Women, MA; ACLU of Massachusetts; Mass. LGBTQ Bar Association and ADL New England.

Nouvelles

WASHINGTON, DC— A coalition of national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights organizations, led by the National Black Justice Coalition and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, today issued the following open letter:

An Open Letter: Trayvon Deserves Justice

We cannot begin to imagine the continued pain and suffering endured by Trayvon Martin’s family and friends. We stand in solidarity with them as they continue to fight for justice, civil rights and closure. And we thank everyone who has pushed and will continue to push for justice.

Trayvon Martin deserves justice and his civil rights. We support the organizations and community leaders who are urging the federal government to explore every option to ensure that justice is served for Trayvon and that his civil rights are honored and respected. But our work does not end there: we will honor Trayvon Martin by strengthening our commitment to end bias, hatred, profiling and violence across our communities.

We represent organizations with diverse lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender constituencies. Our community has been targets of bigotry, bias, profiling and violence. We have experienced the heart-breaking despair of young people targeted for who they are, who they are presumed to be, or who they love: Rashawn Brazell, Lawrence King, Ali Forney, Brandon Teena, Brandon White, Matthew Shepard, Marco McMillian, Angie Zapata, Sakia Gunn, Gwen Araujo and countless others.

Every person, regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity, must be able to walk the streets without fear for their safety.

Justice delayed is justice denied and in the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. “a right delayed is a right denied.” We honor Trayvon by seeking justice for all people.

All Out
American Civil Liberties Union
Believe Out Loud
BiNet États-Unis
Bisexual Resource Center
Center for Black Equity
CenterLink: The Community of LGBT Centers
Consortium of Higher Education LGBT Resource Professionals
Fédération pour l'égalité
Family Equality Council
Freedom to Work
Réseau d'éducation gay, lesbienne et hétérosexuel
Gay-Straight Alliance Network (GSA Network)
GetEQUAL
GMHC
Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders
GLAAD
Harvey Milk Foundation
Campagne pour les droits de l'homme
Immigration Equality
Lambda Legal
Projet d'avancement du mouvement
National Black Justice Coalition
Centre national pour les droits des lesbiennes
National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs
National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
National Minority AIDS Council
National Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance
Out & Equal Workplace Advocates
PFLAG National
Le projet Trevor
Trans Advocacy Network
Centre juridique transgenre
Coalition des personnes trans de couleur

Nouvelles

WASHINGTON, DC— A coalition of national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights organizations, led by the National Black Justice Coalition and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, today issued the following open letter:

An Open Letter: Trayvon Deserves Justice

We cannot begin to imagine the continued pain and suffering endured by Trayvon Martin’s family and friends. We stand in solidarity with them as they continue to fight for justice, civil rights and closure. And we thank everyone who has pushed and will continue to push for justice.

Trayvon Martin deserves justice and his civil rights. We support the organizations and community leaders who are urging the federal government to explore every option to ensure that justice is served for Trayvon and that his civil rights are honored and respected. But our work does not end there: we will honor Trayvon Martin by strengthening our commitment to end bias, hatred, profiling and violence across our communities.

We represent organizations with diverse lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender constituencies. Our community has been targets of bigotry, bias, profiling and violence. We have experienced the heart-breaking despair of young people targeted for who they are, who they are presumed to be, or who they love: Rashawn Brazell, Lawrence King, Ali Forney, Brandon Teena, Brandon White, Matthew Shepard, Marco McMillian, Angie Zapata, Sakia Gunn, Gwen Araujo and countless others.

Every person, regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity, must be able to walk the streets without fear for their safety.

Justice delayed is justice denied and in the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. “a right delayed is a right denied.”  We honor Trayvon by seeking justice for all people.

All Out
American Civil Liberties Union
Believe Out Loud
BiNet États-Unis
Bisexual Resource Center
Center for Black Equity
CenterLink: The Community of LGBT Centers
Consortium of Higher Education LGBT Resource Professionals
Fédération pour l'égalité
Family Equality Council
Freedom to Work
Réseau d'éducation gay, lesbienne et hétérosexuel
Gay-Straight Alliance Network (GSA Network)
GetEQUAL
GMHC
Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders
GLAAD
Harvey Milk Foundation
Campagne pour les droits de l'homme
Immigration Equality
Lambda Legal
Projet d'avancement du mouvement
National Black Justice Coalition
Centre national pour les droits des lesbiennes
National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs
National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
National Minority AIDS Council
National Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance
Out & Equal Workplace Advocates
PFLAG National
Le projet Trevor
Trans Advocacy Network
Centre juridique transgenre
Coalition des personnes trans de couleur

Nouvelles

Following last Wednesday’s Supreme Court decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act, Section 3, the federal Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announced on Friday, June 28, 2013,  that it would now be “able to extend benefits to Federal employees and annuitants who are legally married to a spouse of the same sex.”

Although promising additional information on “a broader range of issues” in the future, OPM offered immediate Guidance on health insurance (FEHB); life insurance (FEGLI); dental and vision insurance (FEDVIP), long term care insurance (FLTCIP); flexible savings accounts (FSA); and the ability of retirees to elect a survivor annuity if they have married following retirement.

Where applicable, OPM has created a special, new 60-day open enrollment period running from June 26, 2013 until August 26, 2013.

The OPM guidance to agencies can be read ici.

In another development that is already affecting many lives, the Department of Homeland Security has clarified that U.S. citizens in same-sex bi-national marriages are now eligible to apply for green cards for their spouse  in the same manner as those filed on behalf of an opposite-sex spouse.

Federal employees with questions or who encounter problems can contact GLAD’s InfoLine at (800) 455-GLAD, or gladlaw@glad.org.

Gill c. Office of Personnel Management

Le 26 juin 2013, la Cour suprême des États-Unis a jugé l'article 3 du DOMA inconstitutionnel. Windsor c. États-Unis.

Pour plus de détails sur cette affaire, les plaignants et tous les documents juridiques, visitez https://www.gladlaw.org/doma

2 août 2012 – GLAD a déposé un mémoire en réponse aux requêtes pour un bref de certiorari par le Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) et le ministère de la Justice (DOJ).

2 août 2012 — Le Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund et les procureurs généraux de 15 États ont déposé amis mémoires à l'appui de la requête pour un bref de Certiorari par le Groupe consultatif juridique bipartisan (BLAG).

3 juillet 2012 – Le ministère de la Justice a déposé une requête pour certiorari à la Cour suprême des États-Unis.

29 juin 2012 – La direction de la Chambre, par l'intermédiaire du groupe consultatif juridique bipartisan (BLAG), a déposé une pétition pour certiorari à la Cour suprême des États-Unis.

31 mai 2012 – La Cour d'appel des États-Unis pour le premier circuit a rendu une décision unanime confirmant la décision du tribunal de district déclarant l'article 3 de la loi DOMA inconstitutionnel.

GLAD a déposé une requête pour en banc révision devant le premier circuit le 21 juin 2011. Le 7 juillet, le ministère de la Justice s'est joint à notre demande de en banc revoir.

25 février 2011 — Mise à jour : Le ministère de la Justice a suivi le retrait de mercredi de deux affaires DOMA dans le deuxième circuit, y compris celle de GLAD Pedersen c. OPM  en notifiant au greffier du premier circuit qu'ils cesseront également de défendre les deux affaires DOMA consolidées, Gill c. Office of Personnel Management et Massachusetts c. HHS.

12 octobre 2010 — Mise à jour : Le gouvernement fédéral a déposé un avis d'appel de la décision du tribunal de district américain du 8 juillet 2010 devant la Cour d'appel américaine du premier circuit.

8 juillet 2010 — Mise à jour : La décision du tribunal de district américain considère que le DOMA viole les principes d'égalité de protection énoncés dans la clause de procédure régulière du cinquième amendement, le 8 juillet 2010.

16 février 2010 — Mise à jour : GLAD a déposé notre mémoire de réponse du demandeur à l'appui de notre requête en jugement sommaire, le 16 février 2010.

29 janvier 2010 — Mise à jour : Le gouvernement a déposé son opposition à notre requête en jugement sommaire le 29 janvier 2010.

17 novembre 2009 — Mise à jour : Le 17 novembre 2009, GLAD a déposé une requête en opposition à la requête en rejet du gouvernement et a déposé une requête en jugement sommaire dans l'affaire.

31 juillet 2009 — Mise à jour : GLAD a déposé une plainte modifiée dans le Gill poursuite le 31 juillet 2009.

8 juillet 2009 — Le 8 juillet 2009, le Commonwealth du Massachusetts a intenté une action en justice contestant l’article 3 du DOMA.

31 juin 2009 — Le 27 mai 2009, à la suite de la contestation judiciaire de GLAD au nom de Gill Suite aux plaintes des plaignants Keith et Al Toney, le Département d'État américain a annoncé une modification de sa politique concernant la délivrance de passeports aux personnes ayant changé de nom après avoir épousé une personne du même sexe. Ces personnes peuvent désormais obtenir un passeport à leur nouveau nom. Keith a déposé sa demande de passeport le 22 juin.

Le 3 mars 2009, GLAD a déposé la première contestation judiciaire concertée et multi-plaignants de l'article 3 de la loi fédérale sur la défense du mariage (DOMA).

Gill et al. c. Office of Personnel Management et al. Cette action vise à priver les couples homosexuels mariés du Massachusetts de certains droits et protections fédéraux. Les poursuites intentées par GLAD ont instauré l'égalité du mariage au Massachusetts (2004) et au Connecticut (2008), les seuls États où les couples homosexuels peuvent actuellement se marier légalement. Cette action, déposée aujourd'hui devant le tribunal fédéral de district de Boston, porte sur l'utilisation de l'article 3 de la DOMA pour priver les conjoints de protections en matière de sécurité sociale, d'impôt fédéral sur le revenu, de prestations sociales des fonctionnaires et retraités fédéraux, et de délivrance de passeports.

Adopté en 1996, l'article 3 du DOMA, désormais codifié à l'article 7 du titre 1 du Code des États-Unis, limite les mariages que le gouvernement fédéral respectera à ceux entre un homme et une femme. L'article 2 du DOMA, non concerné par ce procès, autorise les États à établir des politiques publiques concernant les mariages qu'ils respecteront ou non.

GLAD soutient que l'article 3 de la DOMA viole la garantie constitutionnelle fédérale d'égalité de protection en matière d'impôt fédéral sur le revenu, de sécurité sociale, d'employés et de retraités fédéraux, ainsi que de délivrance de passeports. GLAD soutient également que l'article 3 de la DOMA constitue une intrusion sans précédent du gouvernement fédéral dans le droit du mariage, toujours considéré comme relevant de la compétence des États.

Les plaignants sont huit couples mariés et trois veufs, tous actuellement admissibles à un programme fédéral. Chacun d'eux a déposé une demande de prestations au titre de ce programme, mais sa demande a été rejetée en vertu de l'article 3 de la loi DOMA.

Nouvelles

Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), the legal organization that first brought marriage equality to the United States nine years ago, today hailed the Supreme Court’s historic decisions in Windsor c. États-Unis et Hollingsworth v. Perry. In Windsor, Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was struck down, and in Poiré, the court ruled that the proponents of Proposition 8 did not have standing to appeal lower court rulings.

This means that all legally married same-sex couples will have access to all the federal protections afforded to legally married opposite-sex couples, and that California couples will likely have the right to marry, in accordance with the federal district court ruling.

«The Court has removed the stain and the insult that is DOMA,” said Lee Swislow, GLAD’s Executive Director.  “This is an enormous victory and a joyous day for loving, married couples and their families – and for thousands of couples in California who will now be able to express their commitment through marriage.”

“Today, the Supreme Court affirmed that there should be no gay exception in how the federal government regards marriage.  If you are married, you are married,” said

Mary Bonauto, Civil Rights Project Director for GLAD, and lead counsel in the 2003 Massachusetts case Goodridge c. Ministère de la Santé publique, of the Court’s ruling against DOMA. “Married couples now come before the federal government as equals.”

Married couples from any state with questions about the immediate impact of the Court striking down DOMA can contact GLAD’s Legal InfoLine: 1-800-455-4523; or gladlaw@glad.org; or by live chat at www.gladlaw.org/rights/infoline-contact.

DOMA, which was enacted in 1996, barred all legally married same-sex couples from being recognized as married under federal law.  Its impact and damage has been far-reaching, touching on every area of federal law, from Social Security and family medical leave to immigration policy and tax-filing.

GLAD brought two multi-plaintiff challenges to DOMA, Gill c. Office of Personnel Management in 2009 and Pedersen c. Office of Personnel Management in 2010, winning two district level decisions and one appellate victory, laying legal groundwork for today’s SCOTUS ruling.  GLAD also coordinated the massive amicus effort in support of Windsor, a case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and the firm of Paul Weiss Rifkind, on behalf of Edith Windsor.

“Congratulations to our colleagues and friends at the ACLU, to Edie Windsor, to the American Foundation for Equal Rights, to the plaintiffs in Perry, and the people of California,” said Swislow. “Like our Gill et Pedersen plaintiffs, Edie was stung by discrimination.  She and her advocates have won an historic victory that will enable couples to better protect one another and their children.”

GLAD will be working in coming months on implementation, and will keep the community informed as legal issues are clarified.

Par le biais de litiges stratégiques, de défense des politiques publiques et d'éducation, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders travaille en Nouvelle-Angleterre et à l'échelle nationale pour créer une société juste et exempte de discrimination fondée sur l'identité et l'expression de genre, le statut VIH et l'orientation sexuelle.

Nouvelles

Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), the legal organization that first brought marriage equality to the United States nine years ago, today hailed the Supreme Court’s historic decisions in Windsor c. États-Unis et Hollingsworth v. Perry. In Windsor, Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was struck down, and in Poiré, the court ruled that the proponents of Proposition 8 did not have standing to appeal lower court rulings.

This means that all legally married same-sex couples will have access to all the federal protections afforded to legally married opposite-sex couples, and that California couples will likely have the right to marry, in accordance with the federal district court ruling.

«The Court has removed the stain and the insult that is DOMA,” said Lee Swislow, GLAD’s Executive Director.  “This is an enormous victory and a joyous day for loving, married couples and their families – and for thousands of couples in California who will now be able to express their commitment through marriage.”

“Today, the Supreme Court affirmed that there should be no gay exception in how the federal government regards marriage.  If you are married, you are married,” said

Mary Bonauto, Civil Rights Project Director for GLAD, and lead counsel in the 2003 Massachusetts case Goodridge c. Ministère de la Santé publique, of the Court’s ruling against DOMA. “Married couples now come before the federal government as equals.”

Married couples from any state with questions about the immediate impact of the Court striking down DOMA can contact GLAD’s Legal InfoLine: 1-800-455-4523; or gladlaw@glad.org; or by live chat at www.gladlaw.org/rights/infoline-contact.

DOMA, which was enacted in 1996, barred all legally married same-sex couples from being recognized as married under federal law.  Its impact and damage has been far-reaching, touching on every area of federal law, from Social Security and family medical leave to immigration policy and tax-filing.

GLAD brought two multi-plaintiff challenges to DOMA, Gill c. Office of Personnel Management in 2009 and Pedersen c. Office of Personnel Management in 2010, winning two district level decisions and one appellate victory, laying legal groundwork for today’s SCOTUS ruling.  GLAD also coordinated the massive amicus effort in support of Windsor, a case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and the firm of Paul Weiss Rifkind, on behalf of Edith Windsor.

“Congratulations to our colleagues and friends at the ACLU, to Edie Windsor, to the American Foundation for Equal Rights, to the plaintiffs in Perry, and the people of California,” said Swislow. “Like our Gill et Pedersen plaintiffs, Edie was stung by discrimination.  She and her advocates have won an historic victory that will enable couples to better protect one another and their children.”

GLAD will be working in coming months on implementation, and will keep the community informed as legal issues are clarified.

Par le biais de litiges stratégiques, de défense des politiques publiques et d'éducation, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders travaille en Nouvelle-Angleterre et à l'échelle nationale pour créer une société juste et exempte de discrimination fondée sur l'identité et l'expression de genre, le statut VIH et l'orientation sexuelle.

Nouvelles

Washington, DC – Today, the Supreme Court struck down a central part of the Voting Rights Act, invalidating crucial protections passed by Congress in 1965 and renewed four times in the decades since. The sharply divided decision will significantly reduce the federal government’s role in overseeing voting laws in areas with a history of discrimination against African-Americans.

We, America’s leading LGBT advocacy organizations, join civil rights organizations – and indeed, all Americans whom this law has served to protect – in expressing acute dismay at today’s ruling. Not only had Congress repeatedly reaffirmed the need for this bedrock civil rights protection, but authoritative voices from across America had filed amicus briefs urging the court not to undermine the law: the NAACP; the American Bar Association; the Navajo Nation; the states of New York, California, Mississippi and North Carolina; numerous former Justice Department officials charged with protecting voting rights; dozens of U.S. senators and representatives; and many others.

These varied and powerful voices attest to the self-evident reality that racial protections are still needed in voting in this country. As recently as last year’s elections, political partisans resorted to voter suppression laws and tactics aimed at reducing the votes of people of color.

Voting rights protections, which have long served our nation’s commitment to equality and justice, should not be cast aside now. The court has done America a grave disservice, and we will work with our coalition partners to undo the damage inflicted by this retrogressive ruling.

Center for Black Equity
CenterLink: The Community of LGBT Centers
The Consortium of Higher Education LGBT Resource Professionals
Fédération pour l'égalité
Family Equality Council
Freedom to Marry
Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders
Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC)
Campagne pour les droits de l'homme
Immigration Equality Action Fund
Lambda Legal
National Black Justice Coalition
Centre national pour les droits des lesbiennes
Centre national pour l'égalité des transgenres
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
The National Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance
Out & Equal Workplace Advocates
PFLAG – Parents, Families, & Friends of Lesbians and Gays
Pride at Work, AFL-CIO
Unid@s

fr_FRFrançais
Aperçu de la confidentialité

Ce site web utilise des cookies afin de vous offrir la meilleure expérience utilisateur possible. Les informations sur les cookies sont stockées dans votre navigateur et remplissent des fonctions telles que vous reconnaître lorsque vous revenez sur notre site web et aider notre équipe à comprendre les sections du site que vous trouvez les plus intéressantes et utiles.