
CHRO and Dana Peterson v. City of Hartford
Sitiyasyon: Pèt
Mizajou The Connecticut Appeals Court sided with the City of Hartford, ruling on September 18, 2012, that the trial court improperly reversed the original finding of the CHRO referee. Peterson’s petition to have the case reviewed by the Connecticut Supreme Court was denied, leaving her with no further recourse and ending the matter.
GLAD participated in the appeal of a Connecticut Commission on Human Rights (CHRO) finding against a police sergeant, Dana Peterson, who was denied a position as a canine handler – a coveted and publicly visible position within the force – because she is transgender. The Connecticut Superior Court issued an initial ruling that the CHRO referee ignored serious evidence of discrimination. The City of Hartford appealed that decision in the Connecticut Appeals Court. GLAD filed an zanmi kout in the case, and oral argument took place Tuesday, November 29, 2011.
The Hartford Courant: Transgender Police Officer Still Fighting for Equality
Kontni ki gen rapò
-
Yon dènye nouvèl sou lit pou dwa LGBTQ+ yo
Li plisN ap goumen san pran souf pou pwoteje dwa nou te travay di pou nou genyen yo epi pou nou reziste kont efò ki fè moun vle kontwole lavi nou ak desizyon ki pi pèsonèl nou yo.
-
Fè Chanjman Deyò Tribinal yo
Li plisGLAD itilize yon konbinezon zouti legal, politik, ak defans pwisan pou fè pwogrè nan jistis rasyal, ekonomik, ak jistis LGBTQ+.
-
Soule et al. kont Asosyasyon Lekòl CT et al.
Li plisNan dat 14 oktòb 2021, GLAD te depoze yon dokiman amikal (amicus) ansanm ak Sant Nasyonal pou Egalite Transjèn...