
Pedersen et al. v. Office of Personnel Management et al.
Sitiyasyon: Viktwa
June 26, 2013 U.S. Supreme Court rules DOMA Section 3 unconstitutional in Windsor v. United States
July 31, 2012 – Connecticut Federal District Court Judge Bryant rules that DOMA is unconstitutional.
Judge Bryant issued an order denying BLAG’s Motion to Stay Proceedings on July 4, 2012.
House Leadership via the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings on June 20, 2012. Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to Motion to Stay on June 22, 2012
July 15, 2011 Update: GLAD files motion for summary judgment on behalf of plaintiffs
February 23, 2011 Update: DOJ Announces it won’t defend constitutionality of DOMA in Pedersen
On November 9, 2010, GLAD filed Pedersen v. O.P.M., a second major, multi-plaintiff lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Section 3 and the government’s denial of protections and responsibilities to married gay and lesbian couples.
Pedersen v. O.P.M. specifically addresses married couples in Connecticut, Vermont, and New Hampshire.
Kontni ki gen rapò
-
Poukisa maryaj te vin tounen yon batay legal?
Li plisLwa leta yo te entèdi koup menm sèks marye aklè. GLAD Law te leve kanpe pou goumen – epi li te genyen.
-
Poukisa Egalite nan Maryaj Enpòtan
Li plisMaryaj bay yon pwoteksyon legal ak sosyal pwofon pou koup LGBTQ+ yo ak fanmi yo.
-
10 an apre Obergefell, travay nou pou pwoteje fanmi LGBTQ+ yo ap kontinye.
Li plisGLAD Law te mennen batay la pou egalite nan maryaj epi li kontinye defann fanmi LGBTQ+ yo.