National/Federal Know Your Rights - Page 4 of 59 - GLAD Law
Ale nan tèt la pou ale nan kontni an
GLAD Logo Sote Navigasyon Prensipal la pou ale nan Kontni

Blog

Dokiman Rezistans lan: Semèn sa a nan batay pou jistis

Chwazi kouraj estrawòdinè

Blog pa Ricardo Martinez (li/li menm), Direktè Egzekitif

Brief Rezistans lan: Chwazi Pa komen Kouraj  

Kanpay entimidasyon administrasyon aktyèl la ap dewoule nèt. Nou ap temwen atak sou libète akademik, divèsite antrepriz, ekite, ak efò enklizyon, moun LGBTQ+, imigran, gouvènman eta ak lokal yo, tribinal ak jij, e kounye a avoka ak kabinè avoka.

Sa a se yon estrateji konplè pou netralize opozisyon legal la, efase separasyon pouvwa gouvènman yo, epi bloke nenpòt rezistans nan men enstitisyon ki gen gwo enfliyans ak pouvwa pou aji kòm abit jistis. Se yon modèl ki twoublan anpil ki egzije lwayote patizan anvan tout lòt bagay.

Malerezman, nou wè kèk nan antite ki ta dwe ap travay pou respekte ak ranfòse règ lalwa a – tankou yon ti ponyen gwo kabinè avoka – pito bese jenou devan abi pouvwa tiranik sa yo.

Antanke yon òganizasyon ki angaje nan itilizasyon zouti lalwa pou defann dwa moun ak diyite, wè kabinè avoka pwisan yo angaje plizyè milyon dola nan travay pro bono bay administrasyon Trump la pou evite sanksyon yo te patikilyèman dekourajan e alarmant. Nou pa ka kite endepandans pwofesyon legal la konpwomèt, sinon nou riske febli mekanis ki pwoteje kont otokrasi yo menm.

Obeyisans antisipe sa a kapab yon tantativ pou soti san pwoblèm nan yon peryòd boulvès politik – men desizyon pou ranvèse epi soumèt la ankre nan laperèz ak ilizyon. Jan nou wè plizyè fwa nan administrasyon sa a, objektif yo nan yon eta chanjman konstan. Epi jan listwa montre nou klèman, plis konpayi sa yo aksepte entimidasyon ak taktik ki pa konstitisyonèl kounye a, se plis y ap egzije yo pou yo rete nan "bon favè" rejim nan nan lavni.

Lage kò l devan pouvwa pa ta dwe yon estanda yo aksepte – sitou lè gen lòt opsyon.

Pandan ke gen kèk konpayi ki te pran yon "desizyon biznis" pou sede devan demand administrasyon sa a pou prezèvasyon pwòp tèt yo - epi yo inyore konsekans istorik apwòch sa a - gen lòt k ap reziste. WilmerHale epi Jenner ak BlòkWilliams ak ConnollyPerkins Coie, ak Keker, Van Nest ak Peters se jis kèk nan konpayi ki deside goumen piblikman epi deranje pwosesis pran pouvwa san lalwa a. Williams ak Connolly depoze yon pwosè ki reprezante Perkins Coie nan defi li bay la lòd egzekitif ki vize yo, epi yo te ba li yon lòd restriksyon tanporè yon ti tan apre. Epi Keker, Van Nest ak Peters te ekri yon atik opinyon nan New York Times la, Kabinè avoka nou an p ap sede devan Trump. Ki moun ki pral rantre nan nou?

Kesyon yo a pa yon kesyon retorik. Nou te poze menm kesyon an: Kiyès ki pral vin jwenn nou?

Sa a se yon moman kote tout moun ap patisipe – kote chak enstitisyon ak chak moun nan sèvis piblik ta dwe reflechi stratejikman sou wòl yo pral jwe nan pwoteje demokrasi nou an.

Mwa pase a, mwen te patisipe nan Konferans Pro Bono nan Washington, DC epi mwen te gen plizyè konvèsasyon avèk avoka pro bono ki te la. Anpil ladan yo te konfye m ke atak administrasyon Trump yo sou kabinè avoka yo te lakòz yon efè refwadisman, e, kòm rezilta, kabinè avoka yo ezite pou yo asosye piblikman avèk òganizasyon defans dwa yo. Sa a se kèk nan sa nou dwe lite avèk pandan n ap chèche jistis epi n ap travay pou respekte règ lalwa ak revizyon jidisyè a. Erezman, te gen òganizasyon ki te prezan tou ki te pran devan avèk kouraj epi ki te anvi pratike yon kouraj estrawòdinè.

Laperèz se natirèl, men li pa ka gide nou. Mwen aprann ke lòt bò laperèz la gen yon chemen pou pi devan, nan direksyon jistis. Nou dwe poze tèt nou bon kesyon yo pou nou panse epi aji avèk kouraj, menm lè nou anfas danje. Si nou gen yon pouvwa limite kounye a, premye bon kesyon an ta ka: Ki jan nou bati pouvwa?

Nan Rapò Rezistans semèn pase a, Mwen te ekri sou kèk nan mezi konkrè nou ka pran pou anpeche pwopagasyon vyolans politik la: rete enfòme, kontakte reprezantan yo, sipòte òganizasyon egalite lokal yo, bay don souvan e avèk jenewozite. Sa mwen pa t mansyone eksplisitman se ke tout aksyon sa yo sijere yo ka ankouraje yon anviwònman kote moun gen libète pou yo pran responsablite, kominote, ak defi – ki, an vire, ka ede pwoteje demokrasi nou an.

Lè nou ogmante pouvwa a lè nou rete kowòdone, lè nou bati kowalisyon, epi lè nou ini nan yon vizyon pataje, sa ede kraze koripsyon an epi ranfòse konfyans piblik la nan enstitisyon nou yo, sa ki fè nou tout santi nou pi brav. Se poutèt sa Keker, Van Nest ak PetersAtik opinyon an se yon egzanp apwopriye nan yon efò pou ini yon pwofesyon ki li te ye pou kreyativite, ladrès, odas ak endepandans li.

Pouvwa ki ogmante a kreye tou kouch rezistans, ki fèt ak gwoup ak moun ki reyini ansanm pou devlope yon kowalisyon divès ak byen resouse, ki pare pou defye menas ki kont demokrasi nou an ansanm chak fwa sa posib. Se fason sa a nou rebati nòm politik ak sosyal ki an sante. Se fason sa a nou fòje patenarya inovatè ki pèmèt nou pouswiv jistis pou moun LGBTQ+ yo avèk ijans e agresivite. Epi GLAD Law deja ap fòje patenarya sa yo ak kabinè avoka ki gen kouraj tankou... Stapleton Segal Cochran LLC epi Langer Grogan & Diver PC, ki te pran lapawòl pou mete tèt ansanm avèk nou nan plizyè nan 6 kontestasyon legal nou yo kont dekrè egzekitif Trump yo.

Istwa ban nou anpil egzanp kote kominote yo te leve kanpe pou yo te fè fas ak moman an, malgre risk la, paske rekonpans alontèm nan te vo lapenn. N ap pwoteje avni jenerasyon k ap vini yo – pou yo ka gen yon chans pou nou pèfeksyone epi viv pwomès libète konstitisyon nou an ban nou an.

Yon jou, jenerasyon k ap vini yo ap chèche gidans nan men nou. Petèt pwochen kesyon pou nou poze tèt nou se: Ki jan nou pral defini eritaj nou antanke zansèt jodi a?

Sa pou fè, kisa pou konnen ankò: 

Li plis edisyon Rezistans Brief la.

Blog

Dokiman Rezistans lan: Semèn sa a nan batay pou jistis

Estrateji kont siveyans

Blog pa Ricardo Martinez (li/li menm), Direktè Egzekitif

Sa fè kèk semèn, Depatman Sekirite Entèn nan elimine yon entèdiksyon eksplisit sou siveyans moun ki baze sèlman sou oryantasyon seksyèl ak idantite seksyèl atravè yon aktyalizasyon nan yon manyèl politik Biwo Entèlijans ak Analiz la. Li te rive an silans epi li te byen vit antere anba yon pil aksyon egzekitif prezidansyèl ki pa akseptab. Men, chanjman an te pwovoke yon santiman danje ak laperèz ki ka endike yon chanjman pi laj nan estrateji pou entansifye vyolans politik kont kominote LGBTQ+ la.

Definisyon vyolans politik Òganizasyon Mondyal Lasante a gen ladan l refi volontè bezwen debaz yo (manje, swen sante, edikasyon) ak dwa moun (libète lapawòl, libète asosyasyon). Li difisil pou nou pa make atak kont kominote nou an ak vyolans politik lè moun LGBTQ+ yo ap retire sou sit entènèt gouvènman an ak sou règleman ki sipoze pwoteje nou kont siveyans ilegal. Pandan tout tan ankèt sou diskriminasyon kont LGBTQ+ yo prèske sispann, pwoteksyon kont diskriminasyon nan lekòl K-12, kolèj ak inivèsite yo anba atak, moun k ap chèche azil LGBTQ+ yo ap depòte san yon pwosesis legal, epi menas sou finansman VIH la ap vini.

Retire oryantasyon seksyèl ak idantite sèks nan manyèl politik Biwo Entèlijans ak Analiz la te yon ranvèsman nan efò administrasyon Biden an pou aplike lwa 2020 an. Bostock kont Konte Clayton desizyon, ki te chache anpeche diskriminasyon ki baze sou oryantasyon seksyèl ak idantite seksyèl. Malgre ke langaj manyèl enklizif sa a te gen sèlman katran, li te bay yon kouch pwoteksyon ki te kapab anpeche kèk nan siveyans ilegal moun LGBTQ+ yo - moun ki gen koulè keer ak trans ki pi plis pase sa yo te sibi pandan tout listwa.

Siveyans moun omoseksyèl sa a pran plizyè fòm: la Lavand fè pè nan ane 50 yo lè yo te idantifye anplwaye federal yo epi retire yo nan sèvis gouvènman an poutèt move enfòmasyon yo te gaye sou yo, ki te di yo te reprezante yon menas pou sekirite nasyonal la; ankèt FBI a te fè sou youn nan premye òganizasyon dwa omoseksyèl yo, Sosyete Mattachine, akoz swadizan lyen kominis; desant lapolis nan ba omoseksyèl ki evantyèlman te mennen nan revòlt Stonewall yo; siveyans FBI sou ACT UP ak Sant pou Dwa Konstitisyonèl nan ane 90 yo; siveyans ak pirifikasyon militè omoseksyèl yo epi answit politik entèmedyè Don't Ask Don't Tell la. Egzanp ki pi resan yo enkli siveyans lapolis federal sou manifestan Black Lives Matter yo, Pwokirè Jeneral Texas Ken Paxton k ap eseye jwenn done sou kantite Teksan ki te mete ajou makè sèks yo sou lisans chofè yo, ak Depatman Agrikilti Etazini k ap mande non lidè gwoup resous anplwaye LGBTQ+ yo.

Pandan m te nan Texas, mwen te vin obsede ak kalite atak sa yo. Sa te kondisyone m pou m eseye rekonèt modèl nan aksyon gouvènman an, nan elaborasyon politik, nan depoze pwojè lwa, ak nan langaj lejislatè kont egalite yo itilize. Sa m te remake se ke aksyon yo se te tantativ pou kreye blòk konstwiksyon ki te sipoze elaji paramèt mechanste ki otorize yo. Apati te louvri chemen pou ale pi lwen pandan aksyon kominotè a ak rezistans te modere epi retade ekzekisyon liv estrateji anti-LGBTQ+ yo a. Rezistans ka ranvèse plan yo ki bati sou yon echafodaj fèb ki fèt ak prejije ak laperèz. Ansanm, nouNou gen pouvwa pou nou febli plan sa yo.

GLAD Law ap kontinye fè pati pa nou an ak sa nou vle fè a. litij ogmantasyon presyon estrateji ki pouswiv jistis agresivman atravè aksyon rapid ak estratejik pou itilize tout aspè lalwa pou bloke, retade epi diminye domaj aksyon antikonstitisyonèl administrasyon Trump la. sis defi nou te depoze jiska prezan, senk te reyisi ak lòd restriksyon tanporè oswa enjonksyon preliminè ki bloke politik danjere, alòske youn annatant.

Pou nou pwoteje tèt nou kont plis atak sou moun LGBTQ+ yo, nou tout dwe pare. Nou konnen gen taktik ki pwouve efikasite yo ki ka ede anpeche vyolans politik la gaye toupatou. Kidonk, semèn sa a, an nou konsantre sou aksyon ki konbat vyolans politik yo: kondanasyon piblik atak sou kominote nou an, bati pon kote nou kapab, bay kominote lokal yo pouvwa, avètisman bonè epi prepare pou nou pa panike.

Sa pou fè:

  • Revize Fondasyon Fwontyè Elektwonik la Gid Otodefans pou Siveyans.
  • Idantifye 1-2 sous nouvèl ou ka fè konfyans: Li tèlman fasil pou yon moun tonbe nan yon twou lapen plen move nouvèl. Chwazi sous ou fè konfyans epi kontwole jan w ap pran enfòmasyon.
  • Ajoute nimewo biwo lejislatè ou a nan telefòn ou: Asire w ou sèvi avè l pou raple yo pou yo pale fò epi kondane atak anti-LGBTQ+ piblikman epi pou yo eksprime enkyetid ou konsènan siveyans ilegal la.
  • Patisipe nan reyinyon minisipal ak reyinyon konsèy lekòl la: Bati kominote ki rezistan kòmanse avèk patisipasyon lokal, kòmantè piblik, ak responsablite.
  • Adopte yon gwoup egalite nan tout eta a oswa yon sant LGBTQ+ lokal: Avètisman bonè diminye enpak efò vyolans politik yo. Enskri pou dènye nouvèl pou resevwa alèt aksyon.
  • Prepare w pou mobilize: Pral gen moman ki mande gwo manifestasyon ak aksyon dirèk. Ou ka ede plis toujou lè w patisipe dirèkteman. Men, si sa pa yon opsyon, ou ka sipòte travay sa a tou lè w fè volontarya kòm yon... obsèvatè legal, ede ak planifikasyon, oubyen delivre bagay esansyèl tankou manje, dlo, ak founiti premye swen.

Ou kapab ede GLAD Law kontinye aji rapidman e avèk desizyon pou asire plis viktwa legal toujou:

  • Orè Angajman Pro-Bono: Si ou menm oswa konpayi ou vle pran yon angajman pou ede adrese atak kowòdone n ap sibi a, tanpri voye yon imèl ba nou pou pwomèt angajman pro bono.
  • Vin jwenn GLAD Law la Sèvis Referans AvokaEde manm kominote LGBTQ+ ki bezwen repons pou kesyon legal.
  • Bay yon don jenere: Vin yon donatè chak mwa pou asire yon sipò fiks ak serye. Èske w enterese pou lanse yon kanpay pou ranmase lajan pou asire finansman pou lidèchip vizyonè repons rapid nou an? Kontakte nou!

Ki lòt bagay ou dwe konnen: 

Li plis edisyon Rezistans Brief la.

Nouvèl

Federal Court Rejects Another Trump Administration Attempt to Implement the Transgender Military Ban and Reinstates Nationwide Preliminary Injunction

Lead attorneys for the plaintiffs say military families face a “crushing amount of pressure” and that the motion to dissolve was “nothing more than a disingenuous, last-ditch tactic to sow confusion and cause delay”

U.S. District Court Judge Ana Reyes today rejected a Trump administration motion to dissolve the yon lòd preliminè nan tout peyi a issued in Talbott kont Trump. Judge Reyes issued the injunction on March 18 in a forceful order in which she held that the ban undermines national security and is likely unconstitutional, calling it “soaked with animus and dripping with pretext.” Defendants filed the motion to dissolve on March 21.

In her opinion today, Judge Reyes denied Defendants’ motion, holding that “Defendants cannot evade discriminating against transgender people simply by labeling the policy as addressing gender dysphoria.” Judge Reyes also denied Defendants’ request that she stay her preliminary injunction while the case proceeds.  

As a result of today’s decision, Judge Reyes’ order blocking the government from enforcing the ban will take effect at 7 p.m. on Friday, March 28. That injunction halts implementation of the ban and protects transgender servicemembers and recruits from its significant harms while the future of the ban is being decided in court. These harms include servicemembers being removed from deployments, denied commissions and promotions, placed on administrative leave, denied medically needed care, and ultimately being placed in involuntary separation proceedings, a process used to address instances of misconduct.

Avoka prensipal yo nan Talbott kont Trump, Direktè Senior GLAD Law pou Dwa Transgenre ak Omoseksyèl Jennifer Levi epi Direktè Legal NCLR Shannon Minter, respond to Judge Reyes’ ruling:

“These efforts to stall the preliminary injunction from going into effect to protect our transgender troops burden military families with a crushing amount of pressure as they navigate a limbo with outcomes that will cause devastating harms to the military careers of these incredible soldiers,” said Jennifer Levi, Direktè Senior Dwa Transgenr ak Omoseksyèl nan GLAD Law. “It is unthinkable that we would treat this way the brave individuals who sacrifice so much for our country.”

“This motion was nothing more than a last-ditch tactic to sow confusion and cause delay. There is no way to defend a policy that seeks to recklessly discard thousands of highly trained, skilled, and decorated transgender servicemembers, many of whom have deployed to critical locations across the globe. The government has conceded it has no evidence to support its position and no reason to discharge individuals who are serving capably and honorably,” said Shannon Minter, Direktè Legal NCLR a.

Talbott kont Trump was the first legal challenge filed against President Trump’s recent transgender military ban executive order. The case is on behalf of 32 plaintiffs and was brought by LGBTQ+ legal groups GLAD Law and NCLR with pro bono legal counsel from Wardenski P.C. and Kropf Moseley PLCC.

GLAD Law’s Jennifer Levi and NCLR’s Shannon Minter, the avoka prensipal yo nan ka sa a, yo menm tou yo se transjèn epi yo chak gen plis pase twa deseni eksperyans nan plede ka enpòtan ak LGBTQ+. Ansanm, Levi ak Minter te mennen batay legal la an 2017 kont entèdiksyon militè transjèn nan Doe kont Trump epi Stockman kont Trump, ki te jwenn tou yon òd preliminè nan tout peyi a ki te bloke entèdiksyon sa a.

Aprann plis bagay sou Talbott kont Trump.

Blog

Dokiman Rezistans lan: Semèn sa a nan batay pou jistis

Faith, justice, and persistence

Blog pa Ricardo Martinez (li/li menm), Direktè Egzekitif

Dokiman Rezistans lan: Lafwa, Jistis, ak Pèseverans  

We are living through a time of escalating discrimination, harassment, intimidation, and violence. Our inability to provide immediate relief to so much suffering keeps us up at night. I know it weighs heavy on my spirit.  

For me, those feelings are wrapped up in my Catholic upbringing. My relationship status with my faith remains “it’s complicated,” but there is an inextricable connection that binds my advocacy to the lessons I learned attending church as a child alongside my mother and grandmother. They taught me my highest purpose is to do the greatest good for people without compromising myself or my values.

Recently, I’ve prayed for collective decency, kindness, and mercy. And for the safety and well-being of all people. While systems of oppression are not new, and the fight for LGBTQ+ equality is ongoing, the current callous attacks on our community and disregard for our humanity (sometimes in the name of faith) feel unholy.  

One of my favorite passages has always been, “Whatever you did for one of the least of these, you did it for me.” I always loved that lesson, which uplifts the innate dignity we all possess. It is a lesson that calls us to reflect on how we treat those with the least power: marginalized communities, people experiencing homelessness, and people who are sick or imprisoned. How we treat “the least of these” defines who we are and is a measure of the strength of our democracy. 

The current landscape and its many horrors are aimed at creating insufferable conditions and coercing us to abandon those within our community who need us the most.  

But I’m reminded of another lesson I learned in the church pew as a child: “Though one may be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.” The test we face is our ability to show up for each other. 

Whether it’s immigrants being detained, deported, and disappeared with no due process, unaccompanied LGBTQ+ minors surrendering themselves at the border, trans women being brutalized by police, cutting off funding for humanitarian aid and HIV prevention, or transgender inmates experiencing unspeakable abuse in prisons – the realities of the toll this moment is having may consume and overwhelm us.  

But it’s important to understand that we feel this way by design. The current federal administration is conducting a stress test on just how much indignation towards marginalized communities we will tolerate. But one thing I know about the queer community is that we are relentless in our pursuit of justice and equality. Regardless of how tired we are, of how scared we may be, we show up for those in need. 

I’m really proud of the path GLAD Law has taken to provide relief and support to those who need us the most at this time. 

Shortly after the inauguration, GLAD Law took immediate action challenging Trump’s Day One anti-transgender executive order. As a result of that order, the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) began placing transgender women in solitary confinement, at imminent risk of being moved to men’s facilities and losing their necessary medical care. 

Transgender women face incredibly high rates of harassment and assault, including sexual assault, when housed with men, and withdrawal of medical care causes devastating health impacts. GLAD Law acted quickly, filing three cases, Moe kont Trump, Doe kont Bondi, ak Jones kont Bondi, securing rulings for our clients to remain in women’s facilities and ensuring their continued medical care. We’ve continued to add plaintiffs to our cases as we hear from more transgender women at risk, and this week, the federal judge granted an order directing BOP to return two women from men’s facilities where they’d been transferred. 

Many stories underscoring the direct harm of this administration’s actions have come to our attention through Repons Lalwa GLAD, our free, confidential legal infoline that provides people  with information, referrals, and, if possible, pro bono legal assistance. Over the last three months, our GLAD Law Answers line has received 827 new intakes, compared to 322 intakes by this time last year. The requests for support include questions from incarcerated individuals, people experiencing challenges accessing medical care, servicemembers impacted by the trans military ban, and people experiencing employment discrimination, bullying at school, harassment, and violence. 

I know it feels like fights that were settled and secure are being fought again. It’s not fair that our community is in the crosshairs once more and being scapegoated for political gains. And while we can and should be frustrated that we’re fighting the same, tired playbook, that also means GLAD Law has the blueprint to fight back. Our cases against BOP show how the law and the courts can play their rightful role in stopping unthinkable harm. The Reagan-appointed federal judge saw how Trump’s BOP policy violates the federal Prison Rape Elimination Act and the 8th Amendment, acted quickly, and to date, BOP has complied with those orders. 

That blueprint to get us out of this moment includes showing up for community – all of it. And when I need some reassurance, I call in my mom’s prayer circle, who have been praying every Tuesday and Thursday for a just and merciful outcome. 

Sa pou fè, kisa pou konnen ankò: 

Li plis edisyon Rezistans Brief la.

Blog

Dokiman Rezistans lan: Semèn sa a nan batay pou jistis

Dropping the ball

Blog pa Ricardo Martinez (li/li menm), Direktè Egzekitif

I was in Palm Springs last week when I started hearing about California Governor Gavin Newsom’s podcast and his comments on how he believed that transgender girls and women participating in sports is “deeply unfair.”

I had heard about the launch of his podcast and was excited about the premise: having honest, nuanced, and curious conversations about issues people feel strongly about.

But what transpired did not seem curious, nuanced, or honest – it felt like a political calculation at the expense of a small, vulnerable community who are already under significant threat.

I’ve spent a large part of my career working with lawmakers – educating them on issues that impact our community, answering tough questions, and sharing constituent stories that illustrate how policy and laws affect real lives. I’ve been in rooms where lawmakers have told me that they can’t support specific LGBTQ+ issues because polling is not on their side. And I’ve been in meetings with lawmakers who express empathy and understanding but, when it comes time to cast their vote, have been unwilling to show uncommon political courage.

I’m no longer surprised by politicians who determine their support based on political calculations. But what I struggle to understand about Governor Newsom’s comments is the answer to the questions why now, and why with a right-wing media personality like Charlie Kirk?

Here was an opportunity for conversation. Rather than cowering to pressure or prioritizing politics over principles, I thought – as I know many others did – that Governor Newsom would lead a nuanced discussion. He didn’t. Instead, he disregarded constituents he once celebrated and to whose struggle for recognition and survival he once drew awareness – noting the importance of protecting transgender people because they deserved no less.

I’m most flabbergasted by the timing. The Governor’s remarks seem especially reckless, given the relentless attacks transgender Americans are currently under – attacks that go far beyond sports and are driven in no small part by anti-LGBTQ influencers like Kirk.

There is room to have conversations about people’s genuine concerns and questions about fairness and safety in girls’ and women’s sports. GLAD Law and others in our movement and community have been engaging in those conversations, with the public and with policymakers, to understand why people feel conflicted, and to propose workable policies that ensure fairness and opportunity for all girls, including transgender girls.

This approach is reminiscent of what worked nearly 15 years ago when I worked with GLSEN. I often heard stories from our chapter network about administrators, parents, and coaches coming together to figure out how all students could experience the joy of physical education, sports, and play in an environment where they feel safe, valued, and included.

Yes, these conversations were happening in 2010, and schools were figuring it out on their own. That’s what our public schools and educators do on a whole range of issues, because of their deep commitment to making sure every student is supported and has an opportunity to learn. It wasn’t until anti-equality lawmakers began pushing “bathroom bill” copycat legislation and spreading disinformation about trans folks to create fear and manufacture outrage that schools became epicenters for conflict rather than collaborative solutions.

If Governor Newsom was reaching for dialogue and collaboration with the premiere of his podcast, he fell far short of that mark. At a time when LGBTQ+ people are facing a full-scale attack – from being banished from federal websites, to having our lives and families deleted from school libraries and classrooms, to encountering threats to essential healthcare, to being branded dishonest, lacking in integrity, and unfit to serve in the military, to having our basic right to exist and function in society questioned – our community needs and deserves better than fair-weather allies.

Sa pou konnen, sa pou fè: 

Li plis edisyon Rezistans Brief la.

Nouvèl

Transgender Military Ban Attorneys and Plaintiffs in Talbott kont Trump React to Yesterday’s Hearing to Block the Ban

“The government presented no evidence to justify yanking qualified personnel from vital positions worldwide,” says GLAD Law

WASHINGTON, DC—U.S. District Court Judge Ana Reyes heard yesterday arguments in Talbott kont Trump to make a determination about whether to issue a preliminary injunction that would block implementation of the transgender military ban resulting from President Trump’s executive order. She is expected to issue her decision on this motion prior to March 25.

La Talbott case has 20 plaintiffs who are experiencing significant harms as the result of the ban, including paused deployments, forced administrative leave, delay or denial of essential medical care, and other significant harms including what would eventually result in the end of their military careers by being discharged through administrative separation, a process used to address instances of misconduct. 

Jennifer Levi nan GLAD Law epi Shannon Minter nan NCLR, la avoka prensipal yo nan ka sa a, are transgender themselves and each have more than three decades of experience litigating landmark and key LGBTQ+ cases. Together, Levi and Minter led the legal fight in 2017 against the transgender military ban in Doe kont Trump epi Stockman kont Trump, which secured a nationwide preliminary injunction blocking the ban.

Lead attorneys Direktè Senior GLAD Law pou Dwa Transgenre ak Omoseksyèl Jennifer Levi epi Direktè Legal NCLR Shannon Minter along with plaintiffs Major Erica Vandal epi Dezyèm Lyetnan Nicolas Talbott, respond to yesterday’s hearing:

“The government presented no evidence to justify yanking qualified personnel from vital positions worldwide,” said Jennifer Levi, Direktè Senior Dwa Transgenr ak Omoseksyèl nan GLAD Law. ” We’ve seen plaintiffs abruptly removed from active combat deployments, specialized training operations, and critical leadership roles despite meeting all standards. These service members, and many others, now find their careers suspended, creating dangerous gaps in our military and threatening national security. The American public should be deeply troubled by an administration willing to compromise military readiness to advance its hostility toward transgender people. We remain hopeful the court will act swiftly to stop this senseless damage.”

“I wish every American could have been in court today to hear firsthand for themselves the government admit they have absolutely no evidence to justify this ban,” said Shannon Minter, Direktè Legal NCLR a. “For these servicemembers to be put into this situation, where they are being separated from not just jobs, but a lifelong commitment to military service and to our country—and at the pace at which the government has so aggressively moved to implement this ban—the harms that they have suffered and are continuing to suffer are so disturbing. I can’t stress enough the severity of the harms and the extraordinary pressure that these individuals and their families are currently under.”

“I have served with distinction in the United States Army for nearly 14 years. Before me, my father served for four decades. I grew up on military bases. The military was and continues to be my entire life,” said Major Erica Vandal. “I also have an incredible family. I am married with two children, and their support for me and my military career has required tremendous sacrifices on behalf of our country. I am grateful to have them in my life and for their support, as I know so many servicemembers are to their own families. It’s difficult to have a conversation with them about what’s happening. It’s hard to fully comprehend the full scope and impacts of a ban. The military that we know and love and that I have dedicated my life to is suddenly rushing to place on administrative leave and then purge every transgender servicemember for reasons unrelated to our ability to do our jobs or meet the standards. It is systematically dismantling our careers and seeking to place a stain upon our permanent records for nothing more than who we are.”

“From growing up and working on my grandmother’s family farm in Lisbon, Ohio to my pursuit of a graduate degree in criminology, I have been focused on one thing: training, studying, and meeting my goals to become a member of our military,” said Dezyèm Lyetnan Nicolas Talbott. “I am now a platoon leader for my military policing unit in the U.S. Army Reserve, and more than anything, I just want to continue to do the job that I have qualified for, trained for, and committed to in order to serve my country. The forced separation of dedicated, qualified servicemembers, the dismantling of careers, and the disrespect shown to families who have sacrificed so much is so counter to our military values. These policies disregard merit and achievement and unleash unfathomable harms upon the lives, families, and careers of transgender servicemembers.”

Aprann plis bagay sou Talbott kont Trump.

Premye 100 Jou Reyinyon Kominotè a

Premye 100 Jou Reyinyon Kominotè a

As the Trump administration’s second term reached its first 100 days, GLAD Law held a live community briefing to share updates on the urgent legal challenges we’ve brought to stop, delay, and reduce harm from the administration’s relentless attacks on LGBTQ+ people and other vulnerable communities.

Our Executive Director Ricardo Martinez and members of our legal team – Chris Erchull, Jennifer Levi, and Polly Crozier – discussed the lawsuits we’ve filed so far, five of which have already succeeded in blocking harmful policies, as well as the broader legal and political landscape we’re facing. The briefing also included key takeaways and ways each of us can take action to protect ourselves and support the fight for LGBTQ+ justice.

If you missed the event or want to revisit the conversation, add your email to watch the full recording.

Let’s keep moving forward—together.

Couldn’t join us on the call? Enter your email below to access the recording:

By submitting your email, you agree to receive updates from GLAD Law. You may unsubscribe at any time.

If you have any issues with this form or accessing the recording, please contact mouellette@glad.org.

Resources and links:

Blog

Dokiman Rezistans lan: Semèn sa a nan batay pou jistis

Protecting a dream

Blog pa Ricardo Martinez (li/li menm), Direktè Egzekitif

If I’m being completely honest, I’d like to get married. In a couple of weeks, I’ll be turning 43. I’m the last of my siblings to get hitched and one of the last of my college friend group to have that experience.  

I’ve imagined my mom walking me down the aisle. I want my best friend and fiercest straight ally to be my best man. And, if I’m able, I want to eventually provide a loving home to children who need one or explore assisted reproduction to become a father. 

This dream, only fully available to me in the last ten years thanks to the long-term work of GLAD Law and other advocates, is one that I don’t usually share with many people. I’m grown enough to remember when marriage wasn’t an option for me, so I’ve always tempered my expectations. And while I shouldn’t have to, the reality is that there are times when that dream feels more fragile and less like a sure thing.  

Marriage equality, and thus my dream, should absolutely be safe and secure. It is protected nationwide by sturdy Supreme Court precedent and federal law, as well as by state law and state constitutional guarantees in several states. It also has strong public support because people across all walks of life understand how marriage and family life can be the grounding center of our lives, provide supports that create stability, and give us a sense of community and collective belonging. 

But as symbolic resolutions are introduced in state legislatures, asking the Supreme Court to overturn Obergefell, I can’t help but feel uneasy. I know I’m not alone in feeling this way. Many people have expressed worry about what could happen in the future and asked for suggestions on how to protect their relationships. These worries are coming from many quarters – young people with LGBTQ+ parents, siblings, grandparents, other family members, and friends, and of course LGBTQ+ people themselves – because marriage equality touches and benefits entire communities across the country. 

Let me be crystal clear: No state can take your marriage away. These resolutions, should they pass, will not invalidate anyone’s current marriage or prevent same-sex couples from marrying in any state. Any effort to unravel the freedom to marry would be long and difficult. GLAD Law and our partners are committed day in and day out to defend that freedom. 

These brazen antics signal an attempt to pick a fight. Stunts happen in politics, and the media amplifies them, causing sensory overload. But the silver lining of these resolutions is that they remind people about something that deeply matters: families.  

Families are precious, whatever their makeup, and attempts to undermine them ignite our instinct to protect them. And we should – LGBTQ+ families are part of every community. In the end, many members of our community (but certainly not all) are getting married and raising kids, and LGBTQ+ families have hopes, dreams, successes, and struggles like any other. Threats to disrupt families are bad for everyone.  

While I work on creating my family and living out my dream, I feel honored to be able to help protect those families that have already been forged – including my kid brothers’. Six years ago, he got married to a wonderful man in Mystic, Connecticut. Being granted the opportunity to be part of the organization that helped pave that path for him makes me feel like I’ve come full circle in some way – and it also deepens my sense of responsibility.  

As we see so many things shaken up, it is hard not to worry about attempts to shake up marriage equality – symbolic or otherwise. But I know GLAD Law is preparing every day for any possibility. We will be there, with our allies, to defend against any attempt to reverse the Supreme Court’s 2015 marriage equality decision and to protect the dreams of so many like me. 

Sa pou konnen, sa pou fè: 

Li plis edisyon Rezistans Brief la.

Blog

Dokiman Rezistans lan: Semèn sa a nan batay pou jistis

Turning fear into action

Blog pa Ricardo Martinez (li/li menm), Direktè Egzekitif

Do you remember the energy back in 2017? The outrage, the immediate backlash, the knit pink hats, celebrities being vocally unafraid? The mass mobilizations everywhere ignited hope and kept folks from creeping into despair. That fever pitch of civic engagement peaked with the emergence of the national #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements.

On a local level, in Texas, I recall a similar moment of collective outrage that felt like an awakening when Governor Greg Abbott directed the Department of Family and Protective Services to investigate parents of trans kids. People uniformly felt their moral Spidey-Senses signaling the premonition of an impending threat and, as such, an urgency in action.

Once again, after the initial shock of this administration’s “flood the zone” with cruelty strategy, people are regaining their footing and finding their voice. I see glimpses of collective outrage and action, and I see it across issues, perhaps ushering in a collective cross-movement resistance. People are strategically agitating, thinking of workarounds to the mess created by DOGE and responding to this administration’s affront to American values of freedom, privacy, respect, and community.

  • Communities are leading Know Your Rights trainings on how to claim your rights if faced with ICE agents;
  • Consumers are engaging in boycotts to confront the staggering influence of billionaires on our lives and political system;
  • Outraged Americans are organizing protests in cities across the United States, showing up at town halls, and making calls to their federal and state senators and representatives;
  • Doctors are sharing vital information about infectious diseases on social media;
  • Organizations like GLAD Law are surging litigation efforts to stop, delay, and minimize the impact of these attacks on LGBTQ+ rights and our democracy.

At a time when the federal government is testing how much brutality Americans will tolerate against vulnerable people, this is the moment for action. It is the time to embrace our grief and fear, access our courage, and decide what our contributions to the resistance will be. 

There is a lot at stake. 

The Trump administration wants us to be numb to the complete expulsion of all transgender people from military service, shutting down global funding of HIV treatment access, the demonizing of diversity, equity, and inclusion, and the exploitation of our children’s health and wellbeing. So many things that should be absolutely safe and secure feel like they’re being shaken up, including marriage equality, which has been undeniably good for kids, families, and society.

The last six weeks have left no doubt that there is a broad plan at work to deny LGBTQ+ people, BIPOC, and all women their fundamental rights and to test and erode democratic institutions. We cannot forget our moral strength and obligation to recognize and resist authoritarianism in all its forms.

We cannot tell ourselves that attacks on the rights or freedoms of others don’t touch us directly – because distance from brutality offers no protection from its reach.

GLAD Law will continue to show up to work every day to protect those rights and freedoms. Thank you for being part of this resistance with us.​​​​​

Sa pou konnen, sa pou fè: 

Li plis edisyon Rezistans Brief la.

Nouvèl

On the Pentagon’s Complete Ban on Transgender Military Service

Last night, in keeping with President Trump’s January 27 Executive Order, the Pentagon released a policy that is a complete ban on transgender military service, forcing out current service members and banning transgender people from enlisting. 

The scope and severity of the ban are unprecedented. This is a complete purge of all transgender individuals from military service.

“This is a purge of unprecedented magnitude. There is nothing confusing or complicated about it. The military has 30 days to identify anyone it thinks is transgender, and the only way to avoid discharge is to prove you are not transgender. This is an unconscionable ban that forces the removal of talented service members who put their lives on the line for our nation and slams the door on qualified patriots who meet every standard and want nothing more than to serve their country.”

—Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender & Queer Rights

We are challenging this ban for the thousands of transgender service members and enlistees who meet and exceed the same rigorous military standards as others, and who put their lives on the line to serve their country.

htKreyòl Ayisyen
Apèsi sou Konfidansyalite

Sitwèb sa a itilize bonbon pou nou ka ba ou pi bon eksperyans itilizatè posib. Enfòmasyon bonbon yo estoke nan navigatè w la epi yo fè fonksyon tankou rekonèt ou lè ou retounen sou sitwèb nou an epi ede ekip nou an konprann ki seksyon nan sitwèb la ou jwenn ki pi enteresan ak itil.