Maine Know Your Rights - Page 14 of 16 - GLAD Law
Pular cabeçalho para conteúdo
GLAD Logo Pular navegação primária para conteúdo

Notícias

Woman standing on a balcony
Rikki Bates

Cuidados médicos relacionados à transição de gênero são necessários para muitas pessoas transgênero, mas conseguir que esses cuidados sejam pagos pode ser uma barreira enorme. Planos de saúde públicos e privados tradicionalmente simplesmente excluem procedimentos relacionados à transição de gênero de sua cobertura, com base na suposição infundada de que o tratamento é experimental, eletivo ou cosmético. Pessoas transgênero são desproporcionalmente representadas na prisão e também têm acesso limitado e, na maioria das vezes, inexistente a cuidados.

A GLAD trabalha em diversos contextos para garantir o acesso a cuidados médicos necessários para todas as pessoas transgênero, independentemente de sua situação de vida. Cada vitória estabelece as bases para a próxima, pois cada vez que estabelecemos a realidade e a legitimidade das necessidades médicas das pessoas transgênero, facilitamos a defesa dos direitos de outras pessoas.

  • O GLAD trabalhou com o Departamento Correcional de Massachusetts (DOC) para incentivar a criação de um cargo de ouvidor, com o objetivo de avaliar e desenvolver individualmente planos de tratamento médico para pessoas transgênero no sistema prisional. Mantemos contato regular com diversos detentos que contestam a negação de assistência médica. Esperamos nos reunir regularmente com o ouvidor para continuar a defender os detentos que mantêm contato conosco.
  • A GLAD está nos estágios iniciais de mover um caso em nome de um funcionário do estado de Massachusetts que teve cobertura cirúrgica negada pelo plano da Comissão de Seguro de Grupo.
  • GLAD representa Rikki Bates (retratado acima) em um desafio à negação da MassHealth de cobertura para cirurgia relacionada à transição de gênero; A GLAD já a havia ajudado a contestar com sucesso a negação da MassHealth de sua cobertura para terapia hormonal.
  • A GLAD trabalhou com o Departamento de Serviços Juvenis de Massachusetts e outros defensores para revisar a política estadual e incluir cuidados relacionados à transição de gênero para jovens em ambientes de justiça juvenil. A GLAD está trabalhando em Rhode Island para garantir esse mesmo resultado tanto no bem-estar infantil quanto nos ambientes de justiça juvenil.
  • Em Connecticut, a GLAD defendeu um funcionário público transgênero que teve a cobertura para sua cirurgia de transição de gênero negada inicialmente devido a uma exclusão categórica no plano de saúde estadual. A GLAD trabalhou com seu representante sindical para obter uma resolução do sindicato eliminando a exclusão do plano de saúde para todos os funcionários estaduais.
  • Ao trabalhar com comissões estaduais de seguros, a GLAD expandiu o acesso à cobertura de seguros privados em Vermont e Connecticut, onde as comissões estaduais de seguros emitiram boletins às seguradoras informando que não poderiam excluir a cobertura para cuidados relacionados à transição de gênero. Em Vermont, esse boletim foi seguido por uma revisão dos planos de saúde patrocinados pelo estado para remover exclusões nesses planos.
  • O GLAD está trabalhando com comissões de seguros nos demais estados da Nova Inglaterra para garantir boletins que esclareçam a inadmissibilidade de planos de exclusão.
  • GLAD representa Michelle Kosilek no recurso do Departamento de Correções de Massachusetts da ordem do tribunal distrital federal de que ela recebesse cirurgia de transição de gênero.
  • A GLAD trabalhou com o Centro Nacional para os Direitos das Lésbicas e a ACLU para desafiar com sucesso a exclusão do Medicare de cirurgias relacionadas à transição de gênero. Uma decisão final emitida em 30 de maio pelo Conselho de Apelações do Departamento de Saúde e Serviços Humanos dos EUA remove a barreira de limite para cobertura de cuidados para pessoas transgêneros pelo Medicare.
  • A GLAD representou Vanessa Adams, uma mulher transgênero encarcerada, em uma contestação à exclusão do Departamento Federal de Prisões (BOP) de tratamento médico para pessoas que ingressam no BOP sem um plano de tratamento. Esse caso levou a um acordo no qual o BOP concordou em fornecer tratamento ao nosso cliente e também revisou a política federal para eliminar sua política de "congelamento de quadro".
  • ALEGRE contestou com sucesso a negação do IRS da dedução médica de um contribuinte para cuidados relacionados à transição de gênero em O'Donnabhain v. IRS. Agora todos os contribuintes transgêneros podem deduzir suas despesas médicas necessárias relacionadas à transição.
  • Em Beger v. DMA, a GLAD obteve uma ordem do Tribunal Superior determinando que a Divisão de Assistência Médica deveria cobrir a cirurgia de reconstrução mamária de uma mulher transgênero, necessária em decorrência de implantes mamários defeituosos.

Notícias

Hoje, o mais alto tribunal do Maine decidiu que negar a uma menina transgênero o uso do banheiro feminino de sua escola violava seus direitos sob a Lei de Direitos Humanos do Maine, que proíbe a discriminação contra pessoas transgênero.

clenchy-argument-photo A decisão no processo da GLAD Doe v. Clenchy marca a primeira vez que um tribunal estadual decidiu que estudantes transgêneros devem ter permissão para usar os banheiros que correspondem a quem eles são.
“As escolas têm a responsabilidade de criar um ambiente de aprendizagem que atenda e equilibre as necessidades de todas as crianças e permita que todos os alunos tenham sucesso. Para alunos transgêneros, isso inclui acesso a todas as instalações, programas e atividades extracurriculares da escola de forma consistente com sua identidade de gênero.” – Jennifer Levi, Diretora do Projeto de Direitos Transgêneros
A decisão declarou, em parte, que “[A escola] concordou com a família e os orientadores de Susan que, para este propósito (como para praticamente todos os outros), Susan é uma menina. Com base na sua determinação de que Susan é uma menina e em consonância com as informações fornecidas à escola pela família de Susan, seus terapeutas e especialistas na área de crianças transgênero, a escola determinou que Susan deveria usar o banheiro feminino.” “Esta é uma decisão importante que marca um grande avanço para jovens transgêneros”, disse Jennifer Levi, diretora do Projeto de Direitos Transgêneros do GLAD, que defendeu o caso perante o Tribunal de Justiça do Maine em 12 de junho. “As escolas têm a responsabilidade de criar um ambiente de aprendizagem que atenda e equilibre as necessidades de todas as crianças e permita que todos os alunos tenham sucesso. Para alunos transgêneros, isso inclui acesso a todas as instalações, programas e atividades extracurriculares da escola de forma consistente com sua identidade de gênero.” “Uma menina transgênero é uma menina e deve ser tratada como tal em todos os aspectos, incluindo o uso do banheiro feminino. Esta decisão é consistente com o que educadores e comissões de direitos humanos – incluindo a Comissão de Direitos Humanos do Maine – em todo o país concluíram”, disse o advogado sênior da GLAD, Bennett Klein, que foi coadvogado com Levi no caso. O litígio surgiu depois que autoridades de uma escola primária de Orono negaram a Nicole Maines, uma menina transgênero que estava na quinta série, o uso do banheiro feminino. A escola havia permitido que Nicole usasse o banheiro feminino, mas mudou de ideia após a má conduta de um aluno que seguiu Nicole até a instituição. “Estamos muito gratos e aliviados que o Tribunal tenha dito que nossa filha não deve ser discriminada para tratamento diferenciado na escola simplesmente por ser transgênero”, disse Wayne Maines, pai de Nicole. Como pais, tudo o que sempre desejamos foi que Nicole e seu irmão Jonas tivessem uma boa educação e fossem tratados como seus colegas de classe, e isso não aconteceu com Nicole. O que aconteceu com minha filha foi extremamente doloroso para ela e para toda a nossa família, mas agora podemos encerrar este capítulo tão difícil em nossas vidas. Estamos muito felizes em saber que, graças a esta decisão, nenhuma outra criança transgênero no Maine terá que passar pelo que Nicole passou. GLAD e Jodi L. Nofsinger, da Berman & Simmons, Pensilvânia, representaram Susan no processo. Saiba mais sobre o caso e leia os documentos anteriores. aqui. Leia a decisão completa aqui.

Notícias

Bangor, Maine, — Today, Maine’s highest court ruled that denying a transgender girl the use of the girls’ restroom at her school violated her rights under Maine’s Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination against transgender people. The decision in Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders’ lawsuit Doe v. Clenchy marca a primeira vez que um tribunal estadual decidiu que estudantes transgêneros devem ter permissão para usar os banheiros que correspondem a quem eles são.

The ruling stated in part, “[The school] agreed with Susan’s family and counselors that, for this purpose (as for virtually all others), Susan is a girl.  Based upon its determination that Susan is a girl, and in keeping with the information provided to the school by Susan’s family, her therapists, and experts in the field of transgender children, the school determined that Susan should use the girls’ bathroom.”

“This is a momentous decision that marks a huge breakthrough for transgender young people,” said Jennifer Levi, director of GLAD Law’s Transgender Rights Project, who argued the case before the Maine Law Court on June 12. “Schools have a responsibility to create a learning environment that meets and balances the needs of all kids and allows every student to succeed. For transgender students this includes access to all school facilities, programs, and extracurricular activities in a way that is consistent with their gender identity.”

“A transgender girl is a girl and must be treated as such in all respects, including using the girls’ restroom. This ruling is consistent with what educators and human rights commissions – including the Maine Human Rights Commission — around the country have concluded,” said GLAD Law Senior Attorney Bennett Klein, who was co-counsel with Levi in the case.

The litigation arose after officials at an Orono elementary school denied Nicole Maines, a transgender girl who was then in fifth grade, use of the girls’ restroom. The school had previously allowed Nicole to use the girls’ room but reversed course after the misconduct of one male student who followed Nicole into that facility.

“We are very grateful and relieved that the Court said our daughter should not be singled out for different treatment at school simply because she is transgender,” said Wayne Maines, Nicole’s father. “As parents all we’ve ever wanted is for Nicole and her brother Jonas to get a good education and to be treated just like their classmates, and that didn’t happen for Nicole. What happened to my daughter was extremely painful for her and our whole family, but we can now close this very difficult chapter in our lives. We are very happy knowing that because of this ruling, no other transgender child in Maine will have to endure what Nicole experienced.”

GLAD Law and Jodi L. Nofsinger of Berman & Simmons, P.A. represented Susan in the lawsuit.

Learn more about the case and read previous case documents aqui.

Read the full decision here: Doe v. Clenchy

Doe v. Clenchy

  • Nesta decisão inovadora de 2014, o mais alto tribunal do Maine decidiu que negar a uma menina transgênero o uso do banheiro feminino em sua escola violava seus direitos sob a Lei de Direitos Humanos do Maine, que proíbe a discriminação contra pessoas transgênero.
  • A decisão em nome de Nicole Maines, estudante de Orono, Maine, marcou a primeira vez que um tribunal estadual decidiu que alunos transgêneros devem ter permissão para usar os banheiros que correspondem a quem eles são.

Histórico do caso

A GLAD Law representou uma adolescente transgênero cujas escolas de ensino fundamental e médio em Orono, Maine, a retiraram do banheiro feminino devido à sua condição transgênero e a forçaram a usar um banheiro exclusivo para funcionários, não comunitário, isolada de seus colegas. Por fim, os pais foram forçados a retirar a filha e o irmão gêmeo do sistema escolar de Orono e transferi-los para outra parte do estado, onde pudessem estudar com tranquilidade e segurança.

Os pais também apresentaram uma queixa à Comissão de Direitos Humanos do Maine e, por fim, decidiram entrar com uma ação judicial em nome da filha. A GLAD Law representou Nicole juntamente com o advogado de Lewiston. Jodi L. Nofsinger de Berman & Simmons, PA

Linha do tempo

30 de janeiro de 2014 – Vitória! O Tribunal Superior do Maine decide que negar a uma menina transgênero o uso do banheiro feminino de sua escola viola seus direitos previstos na Lei de Direitos Humanos do estado. Leia a decisão.

June 12, 2013 – GLAD Law Attorney Jennifer Levi presented argument on our client’s behalf before the Maine Law Court (Maine’s highest court). A decision is not expected for several months. Read the press release.

3 de maio de 2013 – O Capítulo do Maine da Academia Americana de Pediatria e outras organizações de bem-estar infantil entraram com uma petição de amicus curiae no Supremo Tribunal Judicial do Maine em nome do nosso cliente.

March 14, 2013 – GLAD Law filed an appeal brief in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court on behalf of our client.

November 20, 2012 – The Maine trial court judge granted summary judgment for the school. GLAD Law announced we will immediately appeal the decision. Read more.

September 19, 2012 – GLAD Law Attorneys Ben Klein and Jennifer Levi were in trial court in Bangor, Maine, for a summary judgment hearing in the case.

On January 30, 2012 – GLAD Law filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that Maine’s law prohibiting discrimination in schools on the basis of gender identity requires that a school provide a transgender girl with access to the girls’ restroom.

Em maio de 2011, a GLAD Law apresentou uma queixa no Tribunal Superior de Penobscot, descrevendo acusações de discriminação na educação e em acomodações públicas, assédio e inflição de sofrimento emocional. Os réus nomeados são o Superintendente do Departamento Escolar de Orono, o Departamento Escolar de Orono, o Sindicato Escolar 87 e a Unidade Escolar Regional de Riverside.

Why Doe v. Clenchy Matters for Transgender Youth Protections

The Doe v. Clenchy decision marked a breakthrough moment for affirming the rights of transgender students in public education. By recognizing that forcing a transgender girl to use a separate staff bathroom was discriminatory, Maine’s highest court set a powerful standard that schools must treat transgender youth with the same dignity and access as their peers. This ruling sent a clear message that a student’s gender identity is integral to their personhood and must be respected in everyday school life.

The case has become an important point of reference for legal advocates working to protect the safety, inclusion, and equal opportunity of transgender youth in schools. Because it was one of the first state supreme court decisions in the country to affirm these protections, it established a legal precedent that has shaped arguments in other cases across the United States. From local school policy changes to national conversions on equality in education, Doe v. Clenchy continues to influence how the law is applied to ensure that every student can learn without fear of being singled out or excluded.

Cases & Resources Advancing Transgender Youth Protections

Doe v. Clenchy is one of multiple landmark cases advancing transgender youth rights through the courts. In addition to this victory, GLAD Law signed onto briefs supporting the right of transgender students at Northern Essex Community College in Massachusetts to use restrooms consistent with their gender identity. Cases like GG v. Conselho Escolar do Condado de Gloucester, Carcano v. McCrory, and other legal challenges across the country continue to affirm that denying restroom access or enforcing policies inconsistent with a transgender person’s gender identity is discriminatory.

GLAD Law Answers offers clear, personalized information about your legal rights and can help if you’re a transgender person facing a discriminatory situation. Reach out to find out how to protect your rights.

Help Protect and Defend Transgender Youth in Schools

Transgender students across the country are facing renewed attacks on their rights through discriminatory state laws and harmful executive orders from President Trump that target bathroom access. GLAD Law works every day to challenge these policies in court to defend the dignity of transgender youth and ensure that they can use the facilities that match their gender identity without fear. Your donation powers this critical legal work, helping to strike down these measures and protect the safety, equality, and well-being of transgender students across the United States.

Notícias

Today, GLAD represented a transgender girl before Maine’s highest court, arguing that her school had failed in its responsibility to treat her the same as other students.

“I was pleased to present Nicole’s case to the court today, and have been privileged to represent her and get to know her remarkable, strong, and supportive family,” said Jennifer Levi, director of GLAD’s Transgender Rights Project,following the argument.

“We have a strong case here of a young girl trying to go to school and learn, and the school failing to protect her. I feel confident that we got a fair hearing from the court, and I look forward to their decision.”

As a middle school student in Orono, Maine, Nicole Maines was treated like other girls until a male classmate followed her into a girls’ room.

The school addressed the boy’s bad behavior by focusing on Nicole, forcing her to use a staff bathroom separate from the other girls. Eventually, the parents were forced to withdraw their daughter and her twin brother from the Orono school system and move them to another part of the state where they could go to school quietly and safely.

Nicole also spoke after the argument saying, “I want all transgender kids to be able to go to school and not have to worry about being treated unfairly or bullied. I’ve been very lucky to have a family that’s stood by me and stuck up for me, and I’m really grateful for them.”

The decision in the case, Doe v. Clenchy, is not expected for several months. GLAD Attorneys Jennifer Levi and Ben Klein are representing the daughter along with Lewiston attorney Jodi L. Nofsinger of Berman & Simmons, P.A.

Notícias

Today, the Maine Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and other child welfare organizations filed an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief with the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in support of a transgender girl who experienced discrimination and harassment at her Orono school.

The student, known by the pseudonym Susan Doe, and her parents have filed a lawsuit against the Orono school district alleging violations of a statewide law prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity and expression in all areas, including public education and public accommodations.

Besides the pediatric organization, other signatories on the brief are: the Maine Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers – Maine Chapter, the Maine Women’s Lobby; Parents, Families and Friends of LGBT People (PFLAG) Portland; PFLAG Machias, PFLAG National; Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) Southern Maine; GLSEN Downeast Maine; Trans Youth Equality Foundation; and Maine Transgender Network, Inc.

The brief states that transgender children need to be treated like any other girls and boys in all aspects of school life – including access to bathrooms consistent with their gender identity – in order to succeed in their educational, social and emotional development.

“Transgender children thrive when they are treated like other girls and boys, and they are harmed when they are singled out and made to feel—and to be seen by others—as different,” the brief states. “This singling out and differential treatment inevitably stigmatizes these young people in the eyes of their peers. That can lead to social isolation which predictably also disrupts their ability to learn. In addition to this immediate negative impact, the resulting stigma from singling out transgender children and branding them as ‘different’ or ‘deficient’ can do serious and irreparable harm to their long-term emotional and psychological development.”
Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) and Jodi L. Nofsinger of Berman & Simmons, P.A. are representing Susan Doe in the lawsuit, known as Doe v. Clenchy. The litigation arose after officials at an Orono elementary school denied the student, who was then in the fifth grade, use of the girls’ restroom. The school had previously allowed Doe to use the girls’ room until it reversed course after the misconduct of one male student who followed Susan into that facility.
Shannon Price Minter, the legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, authored the brief on behalf of the amici, with assistance and cooperation from Richard O’Meara of Murray Plumb & Murray. O’Meara is local counsel for the amici.
“It’s heartening that a respected group of medical professionals like the Maine Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and other experts are underscoring for the court how critical it is for transgender children to be fully integrated into the life of their schools, and how detrimental is when they aren’t,” said Minter. “This is not just a legal issue. Research and experience show that when transgender youth have the support of their families, their schools and other institutions central to their lives, they can thrive and grow into happy, healthy adults.”
You can read the brief aqui.
For more information about the litigation visit https://www.gladlaw.org/work/cases/doe-v.-clenchy.
The National Center for Lesbian Rights is a national legal organization committed to advancing the civil and human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people and their families through litigation, public policy advocacy, and public education.

Notícias

GLAD has filed an appeal in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court on behalf of our client Susan Doe,  a transgender girl who experienced discrimination and harassment at her Orono school.

GLAD initially filed the lawsuit, known as Doe v. Clenchy, after officials at an Orono elementary school denied our client the use of the girls’ restroom and other facilities and restricted her participation in school activities. The school had previously allowed Doe to use the girls’ restroom without incident until one of her male classmates began making it an issue with coaching from his grandfather. Eventually, the parents were forced to withdraw their daughter and her twin brother from the Orono school system and move them to another part of the state where they could go to school quietly and safely.  This appeal comes after summary judgment was granted to the Orono school system in the Trial Court in November 2012.

“Our client was made an outcast by school officials over the course of two years simply because of who she is, in violation of Maine anti-discrimination law,” says GLAD Senior Attorney Ben Klein. Adds Jennifer Levi, director of GLAD’s Transgender Rights Project, “Under Maine law, a transgender girl – whom the school acknowledged is a girl – needs to be able to live consistent with her gender. The school acknowledged that Susan could not otherwise progress in her academic development.”

Maine has a statewide law prohibiting discrimination against people based on gender identity and expression in all areas, including public education and public accommodations.

Read more about the case

Notícias

PORTLAND – Almost one month after Maine began allowing same-sex couples to marry, a recent survey shows that a majority of voters remain solidly supportive of the new law and that the vast majority of Mainers have felt no negative impact.

Public Policy Polling, in a survey conducted Jan. 18-20, found that 53 percent of Maine voters think marriage for same-sex couples should be allowed while only 43 percent think it should not. Despite the overhyped predictions of opponents of marriage, the vast majority of voters have seen no negative effects from the new law.

“Seventy-eight percent of Maine voters – including a majority of people who voted against it in November – say that gay marriage being legal in the state is not having an adverse impact on their lives,” said Dean Debnam, president of Public Policy Polling, in a press release on Friday. “For all the debate over the years, it’s turning out not to be a big deal for the vast majority of voters in the state.”

Maine’s freedom to marry law took affect on Dec. 29. Since that time, hundreds of same-sex couples have received marriage licenses from the state and have gotten married.

“We’ve seen support for marriage continue to grow as more and more loving and committed couples have married,” said Betsy Smith, executive director of EqualityMaine. “Starting on that first night, the joy of marriage has spread to hundreds of families who have been waiting, in some cases for decades, for the chance to say ‘I do’ and accept the joy and responsibility that comes from being married.”

Implementation of the new law has gone well.

“Local and state governmental officials have helped to make sure the new law has been implemented smoothly and that same-sex couples have been able to receive marriage licenses quickly and easily,” said Lee Swislow, executive director of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. “Opponents of marriage have used horror stories to scare people away from marriage for years. But time and time again, the things they predict don’t happen. An overwhelming majority of Maine voters, even some of those who might have voted against marriage, now know for sure that allowing loving, committed same-sex couples to marry doesn’t hurt anyone else.”

For more information about Maine’s marriage laws, visit https://www.gladlaw.org or www.equalitymaine.org.

Notícias

Married same-sex couples in Maine will be able to file their state taxes jointly as married, as reported in this Portland Press Herald article.  For more information, contact GLAD’s InfoLine at 1-800-455-GLAD or gladlaw@glad.org .

December 29, 2012 is the earliest date that marriage licenses can be issued to same-sex marriage partners in Maine.  In addition, the new law extends legal recognition to same-sex marriages validly licensed and performed in other states.

To view the official Tax Alert from Maine Revenue Services, click here.

Notícias

Same-sex couples will be able to begin marrying in Maine December 29, 2012. GLAD, in conjunction with EqualityMaine and Maine Women’s Lobby, held a webinar to answer common questions couples considering marriage may have.

Recursos

Marriage in Maine: The Basics

Information on Marriage Licenses

Resources for Marrying/Weddings at EqualityMaine.org

Maine CDC Letter to Municipal Clerks Regarding Marriage for Same-sex Couples

Marriage Tips and Traps

Legal Rights, Protections, and Obligations for Married Families

How DOMA Hurts Americans – information about the current impact of the federal Defense of Marriage Act on married same-sex couples

If you have specific questions about your situation, please contact GLAD’s free and confidential Legal InfoLine at 800-455-GLAD or www.gladlaw.org/direitos

pt_PTPortuguês
Visão geral de privacidade

Este site utiliza cookies para que possamos oferecer a melhor experiência de usuário possível. As informações dos cookies são armazenadas no seu navegador e desempenham funções como reconhecê-lo quando você retorna ao nosso site e ajudar nossa equipe a entender quais seções do site você considera mais interessantes e úteis.