
Jones v. Bondi
Статус: В ожидании
Обновлять: Мы добились вынесения предварительных судебных запретов, препятствующих участию наших клиентов в трех отдельных судебных процессах:Мо против Трампа, Доу против Бонди, и Джонс против Бонди от перевода в мужские учреждения и обеспечения их постоянного доступа к необходимой медицинской помощи.
Администрация Трампа обжаловала эти предварительные запреты в Апелляционном суде округа Колумбия, и три дела были объединены для рассмотрения и вынесения решения по этой апелляции. Learn more about the appeal.
Case Overview
On February 10, 2025, GLAD Law, along with National Center for LGBTQ Rights (NCLR) and Lowenstein Sandler LLP, filed a federal constitutional challenge to President Trump’s Executive Order “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” which Trump issued just hours after his inauguration on January 20, 2025.
The Order directly targets transgender people by attempting to deny them legal recognition under federal law and to strip them of long-established legal protections with the stroke of a pen. Under this Order, transgender women who are incarcerated in federal prisons will be unlawfully transferred to men’s facilities and denied medically necessary health care.
Our client Jane Jones is an adult transgender woman who has lived as a woman for years. Previous to the Executive Order, she was serving her sentence in a minimum security women’s facility. During her term of incarceration, she has always been treated as a woman by federal correctional officials and her peers. Other than during a brief period of time after the issuance of the Executive Order, she has never been housed in a men’s facility.
Jane is not safe in any men’s prison. She will be at an extremely high risk of harassment, abuse, violence, and sexual assault. Not only that, but being cut off from her medical care will cause additional harm. In addition to being unconstitutional, Trump’s Executive Order is disruptive and cruel, and singles out transgender women like Jane, putting them in additional harm’s way within the prison system.
This case was originally called Джонс против Трампа.
Джонс против Бонди is one of the three lawsuits GLAD Law and NCLR have filed challenging sections of the Executive Order that directs the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to house transgender women in men’s prisons and to unlawfully withhold necessary medical care. Learn more about the other cases Доу против Бонди и Мо против Трампа.
Связанный контент
-
Новое судебное заявление призывает Окружной суд округа Колумбия вынести решение о том, основан ли запрет на военную службу трансгендеров на предвзятости
Читать далееТэлботт plaintiffs alert the court to Secretary of Defense Hegseth’s open disparagement of transgender troops
-
Supreme Court Issues Ruling in Shilling Blocking the Preliminary Injunction Protections and Greenlighting Implementation of Trump’s Transgender Military Ban
Читать далееThe ruling paves the way for a purge of highly qualified transgender servicemembers
-
Transgender Servicemembers in Talbott Urge SCOTUS Continue to Prevent Implementation of the Transgender Military Ban
Читать далееTrump’s plan to target transgender servicemembers for immediate discharge is “unprecedented” and “unAmerican”