Maine Know Your Rights - Page 14 of 16 - GLAD Law
Перейти от заголовка к содержанию
GLAD Logo Пропустить основную навигацию к содержанию

Новости

Woman standing on a balcony
Рикки Бейтс

Медицинская помощь, связанная с гендерным переходом, необходима многим трансгендерным людям, но получение оплаты за неё может стать серьёзным препятствием. Частные и государственные страховые компании традиционно просто исключали процедуры, связанные с гендерным переходом, из своего страхового покрытия, основываясь на необоснованном предположении, что лечение является экспериментальным, плановым или косметическим. Трансгендерные люди непропорционально представлены в тюрьмах, и у них также ограниченный, а зачастую и вовсе отсутствует доступ к медицинской помощи.

GLAD работает в различных контекстах, чтобы гарантировать доступ к необходимой медицинской помощи всем трансгендерным людям, независимо от их жизненной ситуации. Каждая победа закладывает основу для следующей, поскольку всякий раз, когда мы устанавливаем реальность и законность медицинских потребностей трансгендерных людей, мы помогаем другим отстаивать свою позицию.

  • Организация GLAD совместно с Департаментом исправительных учреждений Массачусетса (DOC) содействовала созданию должности омбудсмена для индивидуальной оценки и разработки планов лечения трансгендерных людей в пенитенциарной системе. Мы регулярно общаемся с несколькими заключёнными, которые оспаривают отказы в медицинской помощи. Мы планируем регулярно встречаться с омбудсменом, чтобы продолжать защищать интересы заключённых, которые с нами общаются.
  • GLAD находится на начальном этапе возбуждения дела от имени государственного служащего Массачусетса, которому было отказано в покрытии хирургических расходов по плану Комиссии по групповому страхованию.
  • GLAD представляет Рикки Бейтса (на фото выше) в оспаривании отказа MassHealth в покрытии расходов на операции, связанные с гендерным переходомРанее GLAD помогла ей успешно оспорить отказ MassHealth в покрытии расходов на гормональную терапию.
  • GLAD сотрудничала с Департаментом по делам молодежи Массачусетса и другими активистами в целях пересмотра государственной политики с целью включения вопросов гендерного перехода в систему ювенальной юстиции. GLAD работает в Род-Айленде, чтобы добиться аналогичного результата как в системе защиты детей, так и в системе ювенальной юстиции.
  • В Коннектикуте организация GLAD отстаивала интересы трансгендерного государственного служащего, которому изначально было отказано в страховом покрытии его операции по смене пола из-за категорического исключения из государственного плана страхования. GLAD работала с его представителем в профсоюзе, чтобы добиться решения профсоюза об отмене исключения из страховки для всех государственных служащих.
  • Благодаря сотрудничеству с государственными страховыми комиссиями, GLAD расширила доступ к частному страховому покрытию в Вермонте и Коннектикуте, где государственные страховые комиссии выпустили бюллетени для страховщиков, предупреждающие о том, что они не могут исключать покрытие услуг, связанных с гендерным переходом. В Вермонте после выпуска этого бюллетеня последовал пересмотр спонсируемых государством страховых планов с целью устранения из них исключений.
  • GLAD сотрудничает со страховыми комиссиями во всех остальных штатах Новой Англии с целью обеспечить выпуск бюллетеней, разъясняющих недопустимость исключительных планов.
  • GLAD представляет Мишель Косилек в апелляции Департамента исправительных учреждений Массачусетса на постановление федерального окружного суда о проведении ей операции по смене пола.
  • GLAD работала с Национальным центром по правам лесбиянок и Американским союзом защиты гражданских свобод (ACLU) над успешно оспорить исключение Medicare операций, связанных с гендерным переходомОкончательное решение, вынесенное 30 мая Апелляционным советом Министерства здравоохранения и социальных служб США, устраняет пороговое значение для покрытия расходов на медицинскую помощь трансгендерным людям в рамках программы Medicare.
  • GLAD представляла Ванессу Адамс, заключенную трансгендерную женщину, в деле оспаривание решения Федерального бюро тюрем (БТ) об исключении медицинского лечения для лиц, которые попадают в БТ без плана леченияЭто дело привело к мировому соглашению, в рамках которого BOP согласилась предоставить нашему клиенту лечение, а также пересмотрела федеральную политику, отказавшись от политики «заморозки данных».
  • РАДОСТНЫЙ успешно оспорил отказ IRS в вычете налогоплательщику медицинских расходов на уход, связанный с гендерным переходом в О'Доннабхайн против IRSТеперь все налогоплательщики-трансгендеры могут вычесть из налогооблагаемой базы расходы, необходимые по медицинским показаниям в связи с переходом.
  • В Бегер против DMAGLAD добилась постановления Высшего суда, обязывающего Отдел медицинской помощи покрывать расходы на операцию по реконструкции груди для трансгендерной женщины, которая потребовалась в связи с дефектными грудными имплантатами.

Новости

Сегодня высший суд штата Мэн постановил, что отказ девочке-трансгендеру в пользовании женским туалетом в ее школе нарушает ее права в соответствии с Законом штата Мэн о правах человека, который запрещает дискриминацию в отношении трансгендерных людей.

clenchy-argument-photo Решение по иску GLAD Доу против Кленчи Это первый случай, когда суд штата постановил, что трансгендерным учащимся должно быть разрешено пользоваться туалетами, соответствующими их гендерной идентичности.
«Школы обязаны создать образовательную среду, которая отвечает потребностям всех детей и позволяет каждому ученику добиваться успеха. Для трансгендерных учащихся это включает в себя доступ ко всем школьным помещениям, программам и внеклассным мероприятиям в соответствии с их гендерной идентичностью». — Дженнифер Леви, директор проекта «Права трансгендеров».
В постановлении, в частности, говорилось: «[Школа] согласилась с семьёй Сьюзен и консультантами, что для этой цели (как и практически для всех других) Сьюзен является девочкой. Основываясь на своём определении, что Сьюзен является девочкой, и в соответствии с информацией, предоставленной школе семьёй Сьюзен, её терапевтами и экспертами в области трансгендерных детей, школа постановила, что Сьюзен должна пользоваться женским туалетом». «Это знаменательное решение, которое знаменует собой огромный прорыв для трансгендерной молодёжи», — сказала Дженнифер Леви, директор проекта GLAD по правам трансгендеров, которая представляла дело в суде штата Мэн 12 июня. «Школы несут ответственность за создание образовательной среды, которая отвечает и уравновешивает потребности всех детей и позволяет каждому ученику добиваться успеха. Для трансгендерных учеников это включает в себя доступ ко всем школьным помещениям, программам и внеклассным мероприятиям в соответствии с их гендерной идентичностью». «Трансгендерная девочка — это девочка, и с ней следует обращаться как с таковой во всех отношениях, включая пользование женским туалетом. Это решение соответствует выводу, к которому пришли педагоги и комиссии по правам человека, включая Комиссию по правам человека штата Мэн, по всей стране», — сказал старший юрист GLAD Беннетт Кляйн, который был соконсультом Леви по этому делу. Тяжба возникла после того, как должностные лица начальной школы Ороно отказали Николь Мэйнс, трансгендерной девочке, которая тогда училась в пятом классе, в пользовании женским туалетом. Ранее школа разрешала Николь пользоваться женским туалетом, но изменила решение после проступка одного ученика, который последовал за Николь в это учреждение. «Мы очень благодарны и рады, что суд постановил, что наша дочь не должна подвергаться особому обращению в школе только потому, что она трансгендерна», — сказал Уэйн Мэйнс, отец Николь. «Как родители, мы всегда хотели, чтобы Николь и её брат Джонас получили хорошее образование и чтобы с ними обращались так же, как с одноклассниками. Но с Николь этого не произошло. То, что случилось с моей дочерью, было невероятно болезненным для неё и всей нашей семьи, но теперь мы можем закрыть эту сложную главу нашей жизни. Мы очень рады, что благодаря этому решению ни один другой трансгендерный ребёнок в штате Мэн не испытает то, что пережила Николь». GLAD и Джоди Л. Нофсингер из юридической фирмы Berman & Simmons, штат Пенсильвания, представляли интересы Сьюзен в этом судебном процессе. Узнайте больше о деле и ознакомьтесь с материалами дела. здесь. Прочитать полный текст решения здесь.

Новости

Bangor, Maine, — Today, Maine’s highest court ruled that denying a transgender girl the use of the girls’ restroom at her school violated her rights under Maine’s Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination against transgender people. The decision in Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders’ lawsuit Доу против Кленчи Это первый случай, когда суд штата постановил, что трансгендерным учащимся должно быть разрешено пользоваться туалетами, соответствующими их гендерной идентичности.

The ruling stated in part, “[The school] agreed with Susan’s family and counselors that, for this purpose (as for virtually all others), Susan is a girl.  Based upon its determination that Susan is a girl, and in keeping with the information provided to the school by Susan’s family, her therapists, and experts in the field of transgender children, the school determined that Susan should use the girls’ bathroom.”

“This is a momentous decision that marks a huge breakthrough for transgender young people,” said Jennifer Levi, director of GLAD Law’s Transgender Rights Project, who argued the case before the Maine Law Court on June 12. “Schools have a responsibility to create a learning environment that meets and balances the needs of all kids and allows every student to succeed. For transgender students this includes access to all school facilities, programs, and extracurricular activities in a way that is consistent with their gender identity.”

“A transgender girl is a girl and must be treated as such in all respects, including using the girls’ restroom. This ruling is consistent with what educators and human rights commissions – including the Maine Human Rights Commission — around the country have concluded,” said GLAD Law Senior Attorney Bennett Klein, who was co-counsel with Levi in the case.

The litigation arose after officials at an Orono elementary school denied Nicole Maines, a transgender girl who was then in fifth grade, use of the girls’ restroom. The school had previously allowed Nicole to use the girls’ room but reversed course after the misconduct of one male student who followed Nicole into that facility.

“We are very grateful and relieved that the Court said our daughter should not be singled out for different treatment at school simply because she is transgender,” said Wayne Maines, Nicole’s father. “As parents all we’ve ever wanted is for Nicole and her brother Jonas to get a good education and to be treated just like their classmates, and that didn’t happen for Nicole. What happened to my daughter was extremely painful for her and our whole family, but we can now close this very difficult chapter in our lives. We are very happy knowing that because of this ruling, no other transgender child in Maine will have to endure what Nicole experienced.”

GLAD Law and Jodi L. Nofsinger of Berman & Simmons, P.A. represented Susan in the lawsuit.

Learn more about the case and read previous case documents здесь.

Read the full decision here: Доу против Кленчи

Доу против Кленчи

  • In this 2014 breakthrough decision, Maine’s highest court ruled that denying a transgender girl the use of the girls’ restroom at her school violated her rights under Maine’s Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination against transgender people.
  • The decision on behalf of Orono, Maine student Nicole Maines, marked the first time a state court has ruled that transgender students must be allowed to use the bathrooms that match who they are.

Предыстория дела

GLAD Law represented a transgender teen girl whose Orono, Maine elementary and middle schools removed her from the girls’ restroom because of her transgender status and forced her to use a staff-only, non-communal restroom in isolation from her peers. Eventually, the parents were forced to withdraw their daughter and her twin brother from the Orono school system and move them to another part of the state where they could go to school quietly and safely.

The parents also filed a complaint with the Maine Human Rights Commission and ultimately decided to file a lawsuit on behalf of their daughter. GLAD Law represented Nicole along with Lewiston attorney Jodi L. Nofsinger of Berman & Simmons, P.A.

Хронология

January 30, 2014 – Victory! Maine High Court rules that denying a transgender girl the use of the girls’ restroom at her school violated her rights under the state’s Human Rights Act. Read the decision.

June 12, 2013 – GLAD Law Attorney Jennifer Levi presented argument on our client’s behalf before the Maine Law Court (Maine’s highest court). A decision is not expected for several months. Read the press release.

May 3, 2013 – Maine Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and other child welfare organizations filed an amicus brief in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court on behalf of our client.

March 14, 2013 – GLAD Law filed an appeal brief in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court on behalf of our client.

November 20, 2012 – The Maine trial court judge granted summary judgment for the school. GLAD Law announced we will immediately appeal the decision. Read more.

September 19, 2012 – GLAD Law Attorneys Ben Klein and Jennifer Levi were in trial court in Bangor, Maine, for a summary judgment hearing in the case.

On January 30, 2012 – GLAD Law filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that Maine’s law prohibiting discrimination in schools on the basis of gender identity requires that a school provide a transgender girl with access to the girls’ restroom.

In May, 2011 – GLAD Law filed a complaint in Penobscot Superior Court outlining counts of discrimination in education and public accommodation, harassment, and infliction of emotional distress. The named defendants are the Superintendent of the Orono Schools Department, the Orono Schools Department, School Union 87, and Riverside Regional Schools Unit.

Why Doe v. Clenchy Matters for Transgender Youth Protections

The Doe v. Clenchy decision marked a breakthrough moment for affirming the rights of transgender students in public education. By recognizing that forcing a transgender girl to use a separate staff bathroom was discriminatory, Maine’s highest court set a powerful standard that schools must treat transgender youth with the same dignity and access as their peers. This ruling sent a clear message that a student’s gender identity is integral to their personhood and must be respected in everyday school life.

The case has become an important point of reference for legal advocates working to protect the safety, inclusion, and equal opportunity of transgender youth in schools. Because it was one of the first state supreme court decisions in the country to affirm these protections, it established a legal precedent that has shaped arguments in other cases across the United States. From local school policy changes to national conversions on equality in education, Doe v. Clenchy continues to influence how the law is applied to ensure that every student can learn without fear of being singled out or excluded.

Cases & Resources Advancing Transgender Youth Protections

Doe v. Clenchy is one of multiple landmark cases advancing transgender youth rights through the courts. In addition to this victory, GLAD Law signed onto briefs supporting the right of transgender students at Northern Essex Community College in Massachusetts to use restrooms consistent with their gender identity. Cases like G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board, Carcano v. McCrory, and other legal challenges across the country continue to affirm that denying restroom access or enforcing policies inconsistent with a transgender person’s gender identity is discriminatory.

GLAD Law Answers offers clear, personalized information about your legal rights and can help if you’re a transgender person facing a discriminatory situation. Reach out to find out how to protect your rights.

Help Protect and Defend Transgender Youth in Schools

Transgender students across the country are facing renewed attacks on their rights through discriminatory state laws and harmful executive orders from President Trump that target bathroom access. GLAD Law works every day to challenge these policies in court to defend the dignity of transgender youth and ensure that they can use the facilities that match their gender identity without fear. Your donation powers this critical legal work, helping to strike down these measures and protect the safety, equality, and well-being of transgender students across the United States.

Новости

Today, GLAD represented a transgender girl before Maine’s highest court, arguing that her school had failed in its responsibility to treat her the same as other students.

“I was pleased to present Nicole’s case to the court today, and have been privileged to represent her and get to know her remarkable, strong, and supportive family,” said Jennifer Levi, director of GLAD’s Transgender Rights Project,following the argument.

“We have a strong case here of a young girl trying to go to school and learn, and the school failing to protect her. I feel confident that we got a fair hearing from the court, and I look forward to their decision.”

As a middle school student in Orono, Maine, Nicole Maines was treated like other girls until a male classmate followed her into a girls’ room.

The school addressed the boy’s bad behavior by focusing on Nicole, forcing her to use a staff bathroom separate from the other girls. Eventually, the parents were forced to withdraw their daughter and her twin brother from the Orono school system and move them to another part of the state where they could go to school quietly and safely.

Nicole also spoke after the argument saying, “I want all transgender kids to be able to go to school and not have to worry about being treated unfairly or bullied. I’ve been very lucky to have a family that’s stood by me and stuck up for me, and I’m really grateful for them.”

The decision in the case, Доу против Кленчи, is not expected for several months. GLAD Attorneys Jennifer Levi and Ben Klein are representing the daughter along with Lewiston attorney Jodi L. Nofsinger of Berman & Simmons, P.A.

Новости

Today, the Maine Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and other child welfare organizations filed an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief with the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in support of a transgender girl who experienced discrimination and harassment at her Orono school.

The student, known by the pseudonym Susan Doe, and her parents have filed a lawsuit against the Orono school district alleging violations of a statewide law prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity and expression in all areas, including public education and public accommodations.

Besides the pediatric organization, other signatories on the brief are: the Maine Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers – Maine Chapter, the Maine Women’s Lobby; Parents, Families and Friends of LGBT People (PFLAG) Portland; PFLAG Machias, PFLAG National; Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) Southern Maine; GLSEN Downeast Maine; Trans Youth Equality Foundation; and Maine Transgender Network, Inc.

The brief states that transgender children need to be treated like any other girls and boys in all aspects of school life – including access to bathrooms consistent with their gender identity – in order to succeed in their educational, social and emotional development.

“Transgender children thrive when they are treated like other girls and boys, and they are harmed when they are singled out and made to feel—and to be seen by others—as different,” the brief states. “This singling out and differential treatment inevitably stigmatizes these young people in the eyes of their peers. That can lead to social isolation which predictably also disrupts their ability to learn. In addition to this immediate negative impact, the resulting stigma from singling out transgender children and branding them as ‘different’ or ‘deficient’ can do serious and irreparable harm to their long-term emotional and psychological development.”
Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) and Jodi L. Nofsinger of Berman & Simmons, P.A. are representing Susan Doe in the lawsuit, known as Доу против Кленчи. The litigation arose after officials at an Orono elementary school denied the student, who was then in the fifth grade, use of the girls’ restroom. The school had previously allowed Doe to use the girls’ room until it reversed course after the misconduct of one male student who followed Susan into that facility.
Shannon Price Minter, the legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, authored the brief on behalf of the amici, with assistance and cooperation from Richard O’Meara of Murray Plumb & Murray. O’Meara is local counsel for the amici.
“It’s heartening that a respected group of medical professionals like the Maine Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and other experts are underscoring for the court how critical it is for transgender children to be fully integrated into the life of their schools, and how detrimental is when they aren’t,” said Minter. “This is not just a legal issue. Research and experience show that when transgender youth have the support of their families, their schools and other institutions central to their lives, they can thrive and grow into happy, healthy adults.”
You can read the brief здесь.
For more information about the litigation visit https://www.gladlaw.org/work/cases/doe-v.-clenchy.
The National Center for Lesbian Rights is a national legal organization committed to advancing the civil and human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people and their families through litigation, public policy advocacy, and public education.

Новости

GLAD has filed an appeal in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court on behalf of our client Susan Doe,  a transgender girl who experienced discrimination and harassment at her Orono school.

GLAD initially filed the lawsuit, known as Доу против Кленчи, after officials at an Orono elementary school denied our client the use of the girls’ restroom and other facilities and restricted her participation in school activities. The school had previously allowed Doe to use the girls’ restroom without incident until one of her male classmates began making it an issue with coaching from his grandfather. Eventually, the parents were forced to withdraw their daughter and her twin brother from the Orono school system and move them to another part of the state where they could go to school quietly and safely.  This appeal comes after summary judgment was granted to the Orono school system in the Trial Court in November 2012.

“Our client was made an outcast by school officials over the course of two years simply because of who she is, in violation of Maine anti-discrimination law,” says GLAD Senior Attorney Ben Klein. Adds Jennifer Levi, director of GLAD’s Transgender Rights Project, “Under Maine law, a transgender girl – whom the school acknowledged is a girl – needs to be able to live consistent with her gender. The school acknowledged that Susan could not otherwise progress in her academic development.”

Maine has a statewide law prohibiting discrimination against people based on gender identity and expression in all areas, including public education and public accommodations.

Подробнее об этом деле

Новости

PORTLAND – Almost one month after Maine began allowing same-sex couples to marry, a recent survey shows that a majority of voters remain solidly supportive of the new law and that the vast majority of Mainers have felt no negative impact.

Public Policy Polling, in a survey conducted Jan. 18-20, found that 53 percent of Maine voters think marriage for same-sex couples should be allowed while only 43 percent think it should not. Despite the overhyped predictions of opponents of marriage, the vast majority of voters have seen no negative effects from the new law.

“Seventy-eight percent of Maine voters – including a majority of people who voted against it in November – say that gay marriage being legal in the state is not having an adverse impact on their lives,” said Dean Debnam, president of Public Policy Polling, in a press release on Friday. “For all the debate over the years, it’s turning out not to be a big deal for the vast majority of voters in the state.”

Maine’s freedom to marry law took affect on Dec. 29. Since that time, hundreds of same-sex couples have received marriage licenses from the state and have gotten married.

“We’ve seen support for marriage continue to grow as more and more loving and committed couples have married,” said Betsy Smith, executive director of EqualityMaine. “Starting on that first night, the joy of marriage has spread to hundreds of families who have been waiting, in some cases for decades, for the chance to say ‘I do’ and accept the joy and responsibility that comes from being married.”

Implementation of the new law has gone well.

“Local and state governmental officials have helped to make sure the new law has been implemented smoothly and that same-sex couples have been able to receive marriage licenses quickly and easily,” said Lee Swislow, executive director of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. “Opponents of marriage have used horror stories to scare people away from marriage for years. But time and time again, the things they predict don’t happen. An overwhelming majority of Maine voters, even some of those who might have voted against marriage, now know for sure that allowing loving, committed same-sex couples to marry doesn’t hurt anyone else.”

For more information about Maine’s marriage laws, visit https://www.gladlaw.org or www.equalitymaine.org.

Новости

Married same-sex couples in Maine will be able to file their state taxes jointly as married, as reported in this Portland Press Herald article.  For more information, contact GLAD’s InfoLine at 1-800-455-GLAD or gladlaw@glad.org .

December 29, 2012 is the earliest date that marriage licenses can be issued to same-sex marriage partners in Maine.  In addition, the new law extends legal recognition to same-sex marriages validly licensed and performed in other states.

To view the official Tax Alert from Maine Revenue Services, click here.

Новости

Same-sex couples will be able to begin marrying in Maine December 29, 2012. GLAD, in conjunction with EqualityMaine and Maine Women’s Lobby, held a webinar to answer common questions couples considering marriage may have.

Ресурсы

Marriage in Maine: The Basics

Information on Marriage Licenses

Resources for Marrying/Weddings at EqualityMaine.org

Maine CDC Letter to Municipal Clerks Regarding Marriage for Same-sex Couples

Marriage Tips and Traps

Legal Rights, Protections, and Obligations for Married Families

How DOMA Hurts Americans – information about the current impact of the federal Defense of Marriage Act on married same-sex couples

If you have specific questions about your situation, please contact GLAD’s free and confidential Legal InfoLine at 800-455-GLAD or www.gladlaw.org/rights

ru_RUРусский
Обзор конфиденциальности

Этот веб-сайт использует файлы cookie, чтобы обеспечить вам наилучший пользовательский опыт. Информация из файлов cookie хранится в вашем браузере и выполняет такие функции, как распознавание вас при повторном посещении нашего веб-сайта, а также помогает нашей команде понять, какие разделы веб-сайта вам наиболее интересны и полезны.