
Crandall v. Boston Concession Group
Trạng thái: Chiến thắng
GLAD won a ruling that Massachusetts non-discrimination law applies equally to every employee of Massachusetts companies, even if the employee works out-of-state. GLAD represented two women from Maine who worked in Maine and were essentially terminated after their employers learned they were lesbians. Our clients filed a complaint at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) under the Massachusetts non-discrimination law because their former employer was a Massachusetts-based company. After the MCAD dismissed our clients’ claim for lack of jurisdiction because the events occurred in Maine, GLAD appealed to Suffolk Superior Court. The Superior Court denied motions to dismiss by the MCAD and the employer, and the MCAD then agreed to reverse its position and announced that it would hear claims brought by out-of-state employees against in-state employers. The employer also negotiated a settlement with our clients.
Nội dung liên quan
-
Mở rộng phạm vi tiếp cận của GLAD Answers
Đọc thêmĐường dây nóng pháp lý GLAD Answers của chúng tôi đang nỗ lực giúp đỡ càng nhiều người càng tốt trên khắp New England.
-
New Maine Confirmatory Adoption Law Increases Security for LGBTQ+ Families
Đọc thêmThe new law provides key protections for LGBTQ+ families that reflect Maine’s longstanding commitment to protecting all children.
-
Các gia đình LGBTQ+ đang gặp nguy hiểm: Cập nhật luật nuôi dạy con cái để bảo vệ cha mẹ LGBTQ+ và con cái của họ
Đọc thêmGLAD đang dẫn đầu nỗ lực thông qua Đạo luật về quyền làm cha mẹ của Massachusetts và bảo vệ các gia đình LGBTQ+ trên khắp cả nước.