
Moe v. Trump
Trạng thái: Chưa giải quyết
Cập nhật: We secured preliminary injunction orders preventing our clients in three separate lawsuits—Moe kiện Trump, Doe v. Bondi, Và Jones kiện Bondi from being transferred to men’s facilities and ensuring their continued access to necessary medical care.
The Trump administration has appealed those preliminary injunctions to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the three cases have been consolidated for briefing and ruling on this appeal. Learn more about the appeal.
Case Overview
GLAD Law, with NCLR and Lowenstein Sandler LLP, represents a transgender woman in her case challenging a Bureau of Prisons (BOP) policy directed by President Trump which would override Prison Rape Elimination Act protections for vulnerable populations, including transgender women, and would terminate all medical care for gender dysphoria for incarcerated individuals.
Maria Moe (a pseudonym to protect her safety) is a transgender woman who transitioned well before her initial arrest several years ago and has been housed exclusively in women’s facilities. As a result of the policy, which stems from a January 20, 2025, Executive Order issued by President Trump, Moe was at imminent risk of being moved to a men’s facility and having her necessary medical care withdrawn.
GLAD Law, NCLR, and Lowenstein Sandler LLP filed a complaint on January 26 in federal district court in Massachusetts. The court granted a temporary restraining order that same day ensuring that Moe would remain in the women’s facility and have access to medical care while the court considers further relief.
The complaint alleges that the policies required by the new executive order violate the Administrative Procedure Act because they are arbitrary and capricious and also directly conflict with a Prison Rape Elimination Act regulation requiring prison officials to make housing determinations based on an individualized assessment of safety and security. The complaint also alleges that the policies required by the new Executive Order are unconstitutional because they discriminate based on a person’s transgender status, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause, and violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
Moe kiện Trump is one of the three lawsuits GLAD Law and NCLR have filed challenging sections of the Executive Order that directs the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to house transgender women in men’s prisons and to unlawfully withhold necessary medical care. Learn more about the other cases Doe v. Bondi Và Jones kiện Bondi.
Nội dung liên quan
-
Bản tóm tắt về sự kháng cự: Thế giới đã thay đổi
Đọc thêmSuy ngẫm về năm đầu tiên làm Giám đốc điều hành của GLAD Law, những chiến thắng, sự hỗ trợ của nhân viên và con đường phía trước trong cuộc chiến giành công lý.
-
Luật GLAD hoan nghênh sự bảo vệ mạnh mẽ cho người chuyển giới và chăm sóc sức khỏe sinh sản đã được Hạ viện MA thông qua
Đọc thêmCác nhà lập pháp MA đã bỏ phiếu để tăng cường bảo vệ chăm sóc sức khỏe.
-
Ngày đầu tiên và mỗi ngày kể từ đó: Luật GLAD không ngừng bảo vệ người LGBTQ+
Đọc thêmTrước các sắc lệnh hành pháp chống lại cộng đồng LGBTQ+, chúng tôi đã thực hiện hành động pháp lý ngay lập tức để ngăn chặn, trì hoãn và giảm thiểu tác hại.