
Crandall v. Boston Concession Group
地位: 胜利
GLAD won a ruling that Massachusetts non-discrimination law applies equally to every employee of Massachusetts companies, even if the employee works out-of-state. GLAD represented two women from Maine who worked in Maine and were essentially terminated after their employers learned they were lesbians. Our clients filed a complaint at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) under the Massachusetts non-discrimination law because their former employer was a Massachusetts-based company. After the MCAD dismissed our clients’ claim for lack of jurisdiction because the events occurred in Maine, GLAD appealed to Suffolk Superior Court. The Superior Court denied motions to dismiss by the MCAD and the employer, and the MCAD then agreed to reverse its position and announced that it would hear claims brought by out-of-state employees against in-state employers. The employer also negotiated a settlement with our clients.
相关内容
-
扩大 GLAD Answers 的影响力
阅读更多我们的 GLAD Answers 法律信息热线正在努力帮助新英格兰尽可能多的人们。
-
New Maine Confirmatory Adoption Law Increases Security for LGBTQ+ Families
阅读更多The new law provides key protections for LGBTQ+ families that reflect Maine’s longstanding commitment to protecting all children.
-
LGBTQ+ 家庭面临风险:更新亲子法以保护 LGBTQ+ 父母及其子女
阅读更多GLAD 正在领导推动马萨诸塞州《父母法案》的通过,并保护全国的 LGBTQ+ 家庭。