North Carolina Know Your Rights - GLAD Law
跳过标题到内容
GLAD Logo 跳过主导航到内容

比拉德诉夏洛特天主教高中案

更新: On May 8, 2024, the 4th Circuit rejected Billiard’s discrimination claim. 了解更多.

GLAD Law joined the National Women’s Law Center and nearly 50 organizations in an amicus (friend-of-the-court) brief in the 4th Circuit case, 比拉德诉夏洛特天主教高中案.

Lonnie Billard taught at Charlotte Catholic High School for nearly fifteen years. Despite his exceptional record as a well-regarded English and Drama instructor, the school fired him after he posted on his personal Facebook account about plans to marry his same-sex partner.

By firing him because of his sexual orientation, the school violated Mr. Billard’s rights under Title VII, which prohibits LGBTQ discrimination in the workplace, including by religious employers.

The district court agreed. Our brief urges the 4th Circuit to uphold that ruling.

Carcaño v. McCrory

GLAD joined with the Transgender Law Center, National Center for LGBTQ Rights, and the firms of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman and Sigmon Law on an amicus brief on behalf of school administrators from 20 states – including most of New England – which was filed on June 24, 2016, in the federal court challenge to North Carolina’s HB2.

Each signatory works in a school or system that has adopted inclusive policies and practices for transgender students. Together, these individuals are responsible for more than 1.3 million students across the country.

The brief addresses the signatories’ rationales for adopting, and experience in implementing, policies and practices that respect transgender students’ gender identity.

These educators state that the accommodations are part of providing an optimal, welcoming learning environment all students. Respecting students’ gender identity eliminates the disruption that results from discrimination by teachers and peers and enhances the learning experience. When students are treated with respect by the administration, it communicates to them that they and other students deserve respect.

In the administrators’ experiences, very few students have expressed discomfort about sharing a restroom or locker room with a transgender person. In any event, the administrators can accommodate those concerns by, for example, providing curtains in a locker room, or access to private facilities that can be used by persons of any gender.

Having trans-inclusive facilities at schools prepare students for a world where they will share bathrooms and other facilities with transgender people, and allows transgender students to focus on school instead of worrying about which bathroom they will use.

Carcaño v. McCrory is brought by Lambda Legal and the ACLU.

zh_CN简体中文
隐私概述

本网站使用 Cookie,以便我们为您提供最佳的用户体验。Cookie 信息存储在您的浏览器中,并执行诸如在您返回我们的网站时识别您的身份,以及帮助我们的团队了解您认为网站中哪些部分最有趣和最实用等功能。