
Doe v. Roe Physicians
地位: 勝利
GLAD settled a case against a doctor who refused to provide in-office care to a patient with HIV, after the New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights found probable cause to believe that unlawful discrimination had occurred. The doctor claimed that he did not know whether the procedure could be performed in the office due to the patient’s HIV status, although he regularly performed the procedure for other patients and could identify no medical basis to perform the procedure in an alternative setting. The terms of the settlement remain confidential.
相關內容
-
AIDS Services for the Monadnock Region v. Gilsum
閱讀更多Update June, 2012: GLAD has reached a successful settlement on behalf of AIDS Services for the Monadnock Region…
-
莫納德諾克地區愛滋病服務中心訴吉爾薩姆鎮
閱讀更多Victory! GLAD Announced a settlement in this case on September 1, 2009. The settlement will enable ASMR to…
-
Doe訴納舒厄住房管理局
閱讀更多GLAD won a change in the practice of the Nashua Housing Authority, which had been illegally demanding private…