
Jones v. Bondi
地位: 待辦的
更新: 我們獲得了初步禁令,阻止我們的客戶提起三起獨立訴訟——莫伊訴川普案, 多伊訴邦迪案, 和 瓊斯訴邦迪案 轉移到男子醫療設施並確保她們能夠繼續獲得必要的醫療照護。
川普政府已就這些初步禁令向哥倫比亞特區巡迴上訴法院提出上訴,並將三起案件合併審理,對上訴進行簡報和裁決。 Learn more about the appeal.
Case Overview
On February 10, 2025, GLAD Law, along with National Center for LGBTQ Rights (NCLR) and Lowenstein Sandler LLP, filed a federal constitutional challenge to President Trump’s Executive Order “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” which Trump issued just hours after his inauguration on January 20, 2025.
The Order directly targets transgender people by attempting to deny them legal recognition under federal law and to strip them of long-established legal protections with the stroke of a pen. Under this Order, transgender women who are incarcerated in federal prisons will be unlawfully transferred to men’s facilities and denied medically necessary health care.
Our client Jane Jones is an adult transgender woman who has lived as a woman for years. Previous to the Executive Order, she was serving her sentence in a minimum security women’s facility. During her term of incarceration, she has always been treated as a woman by federal correctional officials and her peers. Other than during a brief period of time after the issuance of the Executive Order, she has never been housed in a men’s facility.
Jane is not safe in any men’s prison. She will be at an extremely high risk of harassment, abuse, violence, and sexual assault. Not only that, but being cut off from her medical care will cause additional harm. In addition to being unconstitutional, Trump’s Executive Order is disruptive and cruel, and singles out transgender women like Jane, putting them in additional harm’s way within the prison system.
This case was originally called Jones v. Trump.
瓊斯訴邦迪案 is one of the three lawsuits GLAD Law and NCLR have filed challenging sections of the Executive Order that directs the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to house transgender women in men’s prisons and to unlawfully withhold necessary medical care. Learn more about the other cases 多伊訴邦迪案 和 莫伊訴川普案.
相關內容
-
新的法院文件敦促華盛頓巡迴法院就跨性別者參軍禁令是否源於偏見做出裁決
閱讀更多塔爾博特 plaintiffs alert the court to Secretary of Defense Hegseth’s open disparagement of transgender troops
-
最高法院就阻止初步禁制令保護和批准實施川普跨性別軍人禁令一案發布裁決
閱讀更多The ruling paves the way for a purge of highly qualified transgender servicemembers
-
Transgender Servicemembers in Talbott Urge SCOTUS Continue to Prevent Implementation of the Transgender Military Ban
閱讀更多Trump’s plan to target transgender servicemembers for immediate discharge is “unprecedented” and “unAmerican”