
Pulsifer v. Portland
地位: 勝利
GLAD represented the City of Portland, Maine against an attack on the city’s domestic partnership registry by ten-taxpayers, along with two anti-gay organizations, the Center for Marriage Law and the Alliance Defense Fund Law Center, claiming that Maine’s anti-gay marriage restriction and its general authority to regulate marriage prevented the City from providing municipal benefits to committed, unmarried families living and working in the City. On April 28, 2004, Cumberland County Superior Court Justice Thomas Humphrey ruled in favor of The City of Portland, recognizing that the Maine Legislature’s enactment of a ban on the marriage of same-sex couples did not bar the domestic partnership ordinance, and concluding that the city was well within its authority to protect the health and welfare of its citizens through the registry.
This decision came one week after the Maine legislature took steps to create equal civil rights for all its citizens. Governor John Baldacci signed into law a bill creating domestic partnerships for heterosexual or gay and lesbian adults who live together under long-term arrangements. The new law also gives domestic partners the same inheritance rights as a spouse when a married partner dies without a will and allows a surviving domestic partner to make funeral and burial arrangements.
相關內容
-
緬因州新發布的確認收養法增強了 LGBTQ+ 家庭的安全性
閱讀更多新法律為 LGBTQ+ 家庭提供了關鍵保護,體現了緬因州長期以來保護所有兒童的承諾。
-
An Act to Provide Consistency in the Laws Regarding Domestic Partners OTP
閱讀更多On January 14, GLAD submitted testimony in support of Maine LD 1804, An Act to Provide Consistency in…
-
Maine Law Court Confirms State Anti-Marriage Law of No Effect in Light of SCOTUS Marriage Ruling
閱讀更多Stating there is no “sufficient … doubt” about the validity of a same-sex couple’s marriage from the date…