部落格

Healthcare Bans are an Attack on Our Community’s Well-being, Decision-making, and Freedom

“Taking away our opportunity to help our daughter live a healthy and happy life is cruel and unfair.”

The quotes on this page are all from Florida parents GLAD represents in Doe訴拉達波案 challenging a policy, first enacted by the state Boards of Medicine and Osteopathic Medicine codified in SB 254, that bans them from meeting essential healthcare needs for their transgender children. GLAD’s Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights, Jennifer Levi, was in federal court in Tallahassee on May 19 asking the judge to halt the ban and stop the unimaginable cruelty and distress these families face because they can’t access the healthcare they need.

In the ongoing campaign against LGBTQ+ rights, extremist forces are pushing for discriminatory legislation that specifically targets vulnerable members of our community, particularly LGBTQ+ youth and their families. One of the most alarming aspects of this campaign is the banning and, in some cases, criminalizing of safe and effective medical care for transgender youth.

“This ban puts me and other parents in the nightmare position of not being able to help our child when they need us most.”

As of May 2023, at least 19 states (Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia) have implemented these policies.

These bans disregard scientific evidence, representing an unjustified intrusion into personal and family medical decision-making. They contradict established guidelines based on extensive clinical research and are endorsed by esteemed medical associations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Doctors with expertise in treating the distress experienced by transgender youth unable to live authentically, as well as parents who witness the positive transformation in their transgender children when supported, widely criticize these bans.

“Having the resources and support to make the best decisions for our daughter’s wellbeing has been so important for our family. We just want to do what’s right for our kid.”

GLAD is challenging the bans in Florida and Alabama, arguing that they unlawfully deprive parents of their right to make decisions about their children’s medical treatment and violate the equal protection rights of transgender youth by denying them essential, doctor-recommended healthcare.

In fact, LGBTQ+ legal organizations are contesting these policies in nearly every state where they have been passed.

Encouragingly, even judges in the most conservative communities have recognized the unconstitutional nature of these bans, which infringe upon parents’ rights to make informed healthcare choices for their children and unfairly target transgender adolescents. Although litigation is ongoing, judges have issued temporary injunctions against these bans in Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Missouri, and Oklahoma and permanently blocked the ban in Arkansas.

Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights Jennifer Levi and Human Rights Campaign Litigation Director Cynthia Cheng-Wun Weaver

Last spring, GLAD helped secure a federal judge’s ruling in Alabama that blocked implementing the state’s criminal ban while the case moves forward. As we prepare for an anticipated trial, this injunction remains in effect.

In Florida, our motion for a preliminary injunction to halt the ban became more urgent when the state legislature passed SB 254 at the end of the session. This new law codifies the Boards of Medicine bans and adds criminal and civil penalties.

On June 6, a federal judge issued a strong ruling that blocks the enforcement of SB 254 and the Boards of Medicine rules for the plaintiff families, ensuring that their children can continue to access needed care.

The ruling also makes it clear that the law is unconstitutional and that the plaintiffs are likely to prevail once the Court issues a final ruling on the merits. It says powerfully that the ban violates parents’ rights to make medical decisions for their children and violates the equal protection rights of transgender people by denying them medically necessary, doctor-recommended healthcare.

Halting and overturning these harmful laws is crucial to safe-guarding access to essential healthcare and ensuring that parents of transgender youth can continue to provide guidance and support. It is also vital in countering the spread of misinformation, anti-LGBTQ+ legislation, and attacks on scientific knowledge and bodily autonomy, which aim to hinder progress.

“Our daughter is a happy, confident child, but this ban takes away our right to provide her with recommended healthcare.”

While LGBTQ+ community members and advocates are diligently working to halt these laws and provide support through mutual aid and information sharing, several states are also taking positive steps. As of May 2023, ten states—California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Vermont, and Washington— and the District of Columbia have enacted laws that protect transgender people’s access to healthcare. These laws include provisions to shield patients and providers from punitive measures in other states.

Additionally, bills addressing similar concerns are pending in Maine, Oregon, and elsewhere. These efforts reflect the widespread recognition of these healthcare bans for what they truly are: attacks on science, our families, our autonomy over our bodies, and our freedom and dignity. All of us — LGBTQ+ youth, adults, parents and families, supporters, and sensible policymakers — must join forces to reverse this backward trend and instead propel our nation toward greater liberation for all.

訪問 www.GLAD.org for more on GLAD’s challenges to healthcare bans and other anti-LGBTQ+ laws and information on which states have passed healthcare shield laws. If you have questions about your situation or are experiencing issues with healthcare access, 聯絡 GLAD Answers.

This story was originally published in the Summer 2023 GLAD Briefs newsletter. 閱讀更多.

部落格

家 » National/Federal » Page 11

Meet Interim Executive Director Richard Burns

Lifelong LGBTQ+ Activist and GLAD Interim Executive Director Richard Burns Cites the Need for Vigilance in the Battle for Full LGBTQ+ Equality and Liberation

Richard, a cis white man with short gray and auburn hair, stands at a podium wearing a navy blue suit — The American LGBTQ Museum Groundbreaking Ceremony © Leandro Justen

As GLAD prepares to begin a robust national search for the leader who will steer the organization’s next chapter, the board is pleased to bring on lifelong LGBTQ+ activist Richard Burns as Interim Executive Director. Richard began his tenure on October 10.

“Leadership transitions are important milestones in any organization at any time,” says GLAD 董事會主席 Shane Dunn. “When the rights of LGBTQ+ people, and especially transgender people, are so virulently under attack across the country, and threats to our democracy are creating new barriers to our mission of realizing LGBTQ+, racial, HIV, and gender justice, we recognize an even greater responsibility to be thorough and thoughtful in this process.”

“We must have a commitment to vigilance, always. The battle for LGBTQ+ equality and liberation will go on for generations. We have to have heart. We have to have grit. We have to have resilience and hope.”
Richard Burns

“With significant leadership experience, including multiple tenures as an interim Executive Director, and a deep commitment to GLAD’s goals as an anti-racist, intergenerational legal advocacy organization, Richard will be able to support GLAD’s ongoing critical work with minimal disruption, allowing us the time to develop a careful search process and a diverse, talented, and passionate candidate pool for GLAD’s next permanent Executive Director,” Dunn adds.

Richard’s passion for justice and commitment to advancing equality has led him from Boston to New York and across the country as an advocate and organizational leader. He served more than twenty years as Executive Director of the New York City Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Community Center beginning at the height of the AIDS crisis, and later developed and led the LGBT Leadership Initiative previously housed at the Arcus Foundation.

In recent years, he has effectively steered several social and racial justice-focused organizations through transition periods as an interim ED, including the Drug Policy Alliance, the North Star Fund, the Funding Exchange, Funders for LGBTQ Issues, the Stonewall Community Foundation, Lambda Legal, and, most recently the Johnson Family Foundation. 

But “Boston formed me,” Richard says, speaking of his roots in the LGBTQ+ legal advocacy movement and, specifically, with GLAD.

In addition to co-founding the Massachusetts LGBTQ+ Bar Association and the Boston Lesbian & Gay Policy Alliance in 1982, he was president of GLAD’s founding board from 1978-1986 and has maintained his commitment to the organization for 45 years.

He talks of GLAD’s radical founding by John Ward at a time when movements for LGBTQ+, racial, and gender justice were converging, and new organizations began to spring up together to advance liberation for all people. On his first day of law school at Northeastern in 1980, Richard met the late Urvashi Vaid – long-time LGBTQ+ activist and a former GLAD Spirit of Justice honoree – who would become a lifelong friend, a GLAD colleague as an early legal intern, and an inspiration in conceptualizing revolutionary, inclusive queer liberation. Richard is chair of the founding Board of the American LGBTQ+ Museum, an in-development project co-founded by Urvashi, among others, to preserve, research, and share LGBTQ+ history and culture.

Kevin Cathcart, Richard Burns & Urvashi Vaid in front of Spiritus in Provincetown, late 1990’s

In the late 1970s, Richard was managing editor of the Boston-based national feminist, progressive LGBTQ+ newsweekly Gay Community News (GCN), which both chronicled and shaped intersectional queer activism at the time. GCN had an active early prison pen pal program, and Richard was a plaintiff in a successful lawsuit when the U.S. Bureau of Prisons declared GCN and another publication, the Task Force’s It’s Time, obscene and tried to block distribution to incarcerated individuals.

Richard also has the rare distinction of involvement with all three of our major LGBTQ+ legal organizations. In addition to his founding role with GLAD, Richard clerked at the National Center for Lesbian Rights while in law school and served on the board of Lambda Legal beginning in 1980.

In preparing to take on the Interim Director role at GLAD at this pivotal moment, Richard is clear that we must take lessons both from the early days of LGBTQ+ and AIDS activism and draw on the wisdom of today’s justice fighters – working with, and learning from, all movements for liberation.

“We all bring all of our identities with us everywhere. In order to build a just society, we’ve got to take into account all of our collective identities. We can’t leave anyone behind,” Richard says.

Recognizing that the far right has all of us in its sights–our movements for reproductive justice, racial equity, LGBTQ+ liberation, and beyond – he adds:

“We must have a commitment to vigilance, always. The battle for LGBTQ+ equality and liberation will go on for generations. We have to have heart. We have to have grit. We have to have resilience and hope.”

Opportunities to Meet GLAD’s Interim Executive Director:

Wednesday, October 25: Defining Gay Community News

Richard Burns will moderate a panel celebrating the 50^日 anniversary of Gay Community News on Wednesday, October 25, 6 p.m., at the Massachusetts Historical Society. Visit the History Project for details.

Thursday, November 9: Spirit of Justice

Richard will speak at our annual Spirit of Justice Award Dinner. Visit www.GLAD.org/SOJ to join us.

這個故事最初發表在 2023 年秋季 GLAD Briefs 時事通訊中。閱讀更多.

部落格

家 » National/Federal » Page 11

Defending Our Common Humanity

Far-right attacks are putting transgender youth and their families directly in harm’s way and putting all of us at risk. We are fighting back.

We all deserve to live and love freely and be supported and celebrated for who we are. The current onslaught of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is taking aim at those fundamental ideals, with devastating consequences for children, families, and all of us.

Since 2021, 22 states have passed transgender healthcare bans and 23 states have barred transgender kids as young as elementary school from playing school sports. Multiple states have passed some version of a “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law censoring teachers, schools, and students. Others have made it impossible for transgender and gender-diverse students to use the restroom at school.

A handful of states now require schools to out students to parents, a policy far-right groups are pushing for in the courts and local communities as well. Such policies interfere with teachers’ ability to support their students and to help ensure parents have the resources they need to support their LGBTQ+ children.

“We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.
– Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights

States are trying to ban drag shows and keep books about LGBTQ+ families out of school libraries.

The far right is advancing its anti-democratic agenda on the backs of transgender and LGBQ+ youth and adults. Fortunately, those of us who believe in freedom and our common humanity are fighting back.

GLAD is in the thick of the fight, directly challenging laws in Alabama, Florida, and New Hampshire, and supporting our partner organizations in other legal battles across the country.

In Alabama, we are challenging the criminal ban on medical care for transgender adolescents.

Last year, we presented two days of testimony in federal court from medical and scientific experts, transgender adolescents, and their parents. The Court concluded, as every other district court judge across the country to hear the facts since has, that there is no justifiable reason for the state to categorically ban access to safe, established, and necessary medical care simply because someone is transgender.

A panel of the 11^日 Circuit Court of Appeals recently reversed the district court’s ruling. We are asking the full 11^日 Circuit to reconsider the panel opinion and preserve the injunction barring the law from being enforced.

In Florida, where another district court also preliminarily blocked a law banning care for transgender adolescents, we are preparing for a full trial this December. We are also challenging restrictions put on transgender adults’ ability to obtain gender transition-related health care.

These laws target transgender people and put parents in the excruciating position of not being able to provide their adolescent children with the care they know they need to thrive.

As Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights and GLAD’s lead attorney in Alabama and Florida put it: “We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.”

In New Hampshire, we are challenging a school censorship law that chills teachers’ ability to talk to students honestly about race, disability, and LGBTQ+ identities.

Throughout New England we have worked overtime the past three sessions to stop the same harmful anti-LGBTQ+ bills we are seeing across the country.

That includes successfully defeating a bill last year that would have reversed New Hampshire’s ban on the debunked and dangerous practice of so-called conversion therapy. An attempt to challenge another state’s conversion therapy ban is pending consideration at the U.S. Supreme Court.

It can sometimes feel like these attacks came out of nowhere. But we know better. Our community has made tremendous progress over the past 20 years and the right is trying hard to reverse that.

Two decades ago, we began to see states passing express protections against discrimination for transgender people. Today, nearly half the states have such laws on the books.

We are fighting for our freedom, for our right to be ourselves, to live and love fully, and to celebrate our shared humanity. It’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.

Legal victories, educational research, and community advocacy have brought schools to a place of deeper understanding about the importance and fairness of supporting transgender students to express themselves and be respected for who they are.

The medical community has developed policies and practices to make safe and effective treatments for gender dysphoria more accessible. More and more families have the tools to understand and support their transgender children.

In 2020, the Supreme Court affirmed that discrimination on the basis of transgender status and sexual orientation is unlawful under federal law. And earlier this year, the Supreme Court declined to review a landmark ruling from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming that the Americans with Disabilities Act protects transgender people from disability discrimination.

Increased visibility and understanding of our lives and increased legal protections have all made it more possible for transgender and LGBQ+ people to fully participate in civic life – to live and love freely, to be embraced by families and integrated fully into our communities.

Now, a deliberate effort by influential politically motivated actors seeks to replace our shared humanity with fear and disinformation.

Our power lies in collective action—advocating in courts and in legislatures, and engaging at the ballot box, in grassroots activism, and in everyday conversations.

And the good news is – even now – when we fight, we can win.

Over 500 anti-LGBTQ+ bills were introduced across the country this year – and the vast, vast majority of those were defeated. When federal courts have had the chance to hear our full arguments and truly understand the impact of these laws on people’s lives, we’ve won. Far too many hostile bills have passed, to be sure. But we also can’t lose sight of how many we have defeated.

And while it sometimes seems like we are exclusively playing defense, we are also still advancing laws to protect our community.

This year, Michigan became the 23^rd state, along with DC and the U.S. Virgin Islands, to provide comprehensive nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people.

15 states have adopted “provider shield laws” that protect access to medical care for transgender people – GLAD worked with state partners to pass such laws in Massachusetts and Vermont, with more to come.

In Maine this year we helped pass a law that creates a pathway for 16- and 17-year-old transgender adolescents to get medical care in the extraordinary circumstances where a parent objects to care even though denying it results in harm.

Those who want to move us backward and put our community in harm’s way have a lot of power and resources, it’s true. We have our work cut out for us, and we know we won’t win every fight. But we are fighting for our freedom, for our right to be ourselves, to live and love fully, and to celebrate our shared humanity.

That’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.

這個故事最初發表在 2023 年秋季 GLAD Briefs 時事通訊中。閱讀更多.

部落格

家 » National/Federal » Page 11

Protecting LGBTQ+ Students

Creating Safe and Inclusive Schools Together

All students deserve to feel safe and included at school and have an educational environment that welcomes and affirms their full identities.

Research demonstrates that such positive school climates are necessary for all youth to learn and thrive. For many LGBTQ+ students, this journey includes sharing their identity with their friends or a trusted teacher before they’re ready to do so at home. While most youth want to and do come out to their family in their own time, some are losing that choice. Far-right legal groups are challenging these positive school policies, and some states are enacting laws that would force faculty to contact students’ homes before the students are ready, under the guise of “parents’ rights.”

The past few years of intense political scrutiny and legislative attacks have taken a toll on young people’s mental health and led to trans and LGBQ youth experiencing increased harassment. And so-called “parents’ rights” bills have made it less safe for young people who can’t be their authentic selves with their families. Teachers care about their students and know that generally, kids do better when they can talk to their parents. But sadly, that’s not an option for some youth, leading them to feel isolated both at home and school. But we are fighting to protect 全部 youth, whether they cannot come out at home or need support to discuss their identities with their parents when they are ready.

These “forced outing” bills directly contradict schools’ responsibility to create a supportive educational environment. Federal constitutional protections and many state-based laws are in place to safeguard the rights of LGBTQ+ students. Nevertheless, even in states with explicit obligations to protect LGBTQ+ youth, a vocal minority is attempting to deny young people the autonomy to choose when and how to share their identities with their families.

In September, The First Circuit Court of Appeals heard Foote v. Town of Ludlow, which centers on this issue. We submitted a friend-of-the-court brief with the Massachusetts Superintendent’s Association, sharing research that shows positive school climates and trusted relationships with adults are critical to academic success for all students.

“When teachers and other educators acknowledge and respect students, including their requested names and pronouns, that creates the safety that allows brain development and learning to flourish while also meeting the requirement of equal educational opportunity,” said Mary Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies, at the filing.

GLAD is committed to protecting students and ensuring schools can create positive, inclusive learning environments. But parents and allies can make an impact too.

In addition to supporting GLAD in this crucial work, you can advocate for the LGBTQ+ youth in your life by checking out our website’s school resources page. You’ll find information on LGBTQ+ student rights, bullying protections, and guidance for schools in every New England state and across the country. We’ve also included resources from our partners on inclusion for transgender students in school sports and all areas of academic life, how to advocate for positive school climates, resources for educators, and more.

Familiarizing yourself with these resources can help you advocate for youth and encourage schools to meet their responsibility to ensure equal education and safety for all students. Public schools and many private schools are legally obligated to act when students face bullying and other kinds of mistreatment or harassment so that all students can learn and thrive.

If you need further support, GLAD 答案 can provide free and confidential legal information and assistance.

這個故事最初發表在 2023 年秋季 GLAD Briefs 時事通訊中。閱讀更多.

部落格

家 » National/Federal » Page 11

每個人的尊嚴和平等

**慶祝 20 週年古德里奇訴 DPH 為馬薩諸塞州乃至全國帶來了婚姻自由**

本文摘錄自 2023 年 11/12 月刊波士頓精神.

二十年前，也就是 2003 年 11 月 18 日，麻薩諸塞州最高法院在其具有里程碑意義的判決中打破了 LGBTQ+ 人群結婚的歷史性障礙。 古德里奇訴公共衛生部 這項裁決使馬薩諸塞州成為第一個裁定LGBTQ+群體必須享有同等結婚或不結婚自由的州。這項裁決要求在六個月內開放合法婚姻的大門。

用 首席大法官瑪格麗特·H·馬歇爾的多數意見，「馬薩諸塞州憲法肯定了所有人的尊嚴和平等。它禁止製造二等公民。」這段頌揚婚姻中的承諾、親密關係、家庭和互惠的文字，至今仍在馬薩諸塞州乃至世界各地的婚禮慶典中被引用。

GLAD 已提交 古德里奇 於 2001 年 4 月代表 7 對夫婦尋求一些簡單而深刻的事情：透過結束對合法婚姻的排斥以及婚姻的保護、權利和責任，憲法尊重他們的個人承諾。

懷著無比的感激之情，為了表彰他們對我們的社區、州和國家的重大影響，我們非常高興地慶祝 古德里奇 原告作為 2023年正義精神獎得獎者在 GLAD 的正義精神晚宴上。

我們向 Gloria Bailey-Davies、Linda Bailey-Davies、Edward Balmelli、Maureen Brodoff、Gary Chalmers、Rob Compton、Hillary Goodridge、Julie Goodridge、Michael Horgan、Richard Linnell、Gina Nortonsmith、Heidi Nortonsmith、Ellen Wade 和 David Wilson 表示敬意。

Spirit of Justice Award Dinner graphic - blue with justice statue on right. Thurs Nov 9. Join the can't miss event for supporters of LGBTQ+ equality

他們每個人都真誠地奉獻自己，即使在媒體和政治關注與衝突的嚴峻考驗下，也與更廣泛的社區建立了聯繫和理解的橋樑。他們為馬薩諸塞州所有人推進了平等權利，這束希望的光芒傳播到了四面八方。他們與其他婚姻原告一起，包括先前在夏威夷和佛蒙特州的挑戰。 古德里奇以及此後全國各地的病例， 古德里奇 原告的徹底勝利為更多勝利鋪平了道路。

Several people, the Goodridge plaintiffs, standing together in front of GLAD banner — *古德里奇* 原告出席 2013 年正義精神獎頒獎晚宴，與獲獎首席大法官瑪格麗特·H·馬歇爾和瑪麗·博諾托合影

麻州人民婚姻的現實為廢除聯邦婚姻保護法奠定了基礎——首先是 GLAD 在 2009 年向聯邦法院提出挑戰，2012 年在第一巡迴上訴法院獲得一致勝利，然後由其他原告在 2013 年向最高法院提起訴訟。包括 GLAD 在內的社區成員和組織在美國各地的立法機構和法院合作。 2013 年，GLAD 被邀請加入代表密西根州原告的團隊，參與最終提交最高法院的案件。 奧貝格費爾 2015 年全國婚姻平權裁決。

現在回想起來，人們很容易認為這一切都是不可避免的。但事實遠非如此。

這需要14名原告、律師、法庭之友及其律師以及其他許多人的不懈努力、奉獻和勇氣。 古德里奇 原告承受了初審法院的敗訴——這是意料之中但仍然令人失望的——並加倍努力與人們溝通為什麼婚姻對他們很重要。

勝利是甜蜜的。 2003年11月18日，最高法院（SJC）做出了一項意義非凡、意義重大的裁決，堪稱一場勝利。即便如此，這並非終點。人們的反應迅速──既有歡呼雀躍的歡慶，也有強烈的反對聲浪。

同時，立法機構召開制憲會議，討論是否在憲法上禁止同性婚姻或維護法院的裁決。

到處都貼著「我支持 SJC」的貼紙，州議會大廈內外也擠滿了支持者和反對者。

在這一切之中，情侶們出於簡單的願望，為了保護他們幾十年的愛情和承諾，並計劃舉行婚禮慶典。

最終，2004 年 5 月 17 日，清晨脫口秀節目開始播出，LGBTQ+ 人士和盟友支持英聯邦各城鎮尋求結婚的夫婦.

馬薩諸塞州憲法肯定了所有人的尊嚴和平等。它禁止製造二等公民。
– 首席大法官瑪格麗特·H·馬歇爾

在全國人民的注視下，馬薩諸塞州率先在全國範圍內批准了同性婚姻，這讓我們感到無比欣喜。

儘管如此，仍有工作要做。還有多場制憲會議和關於必要程序的訴訟。最重要的是，聯邦人民與民選官員、鄰居和家人進行了溝通。

最終，立法機關於2007年6月以超過參眾兩院四分之三的投票率，最終否決了最後一項憲法修正案。聯邦借鑒了 古德里奇 原告找到了共同點和我們共同的人性。

這是官方消息——婚姻平權現在將在馬薩諸塞州實現。

法律上的勝利以及馬薩諸塞州普通民眾為捍衛這一勝利所開展的令人難以置信的辯護為平等創造了動力，但國家進步仍然緩慢得令人惱火。

那些試圖製造恐懼、奪取權力的政客們，利用我們社區爭取基本尊嚴和人權的鬥爭——如今我們再次目睹了這樣的事。州法律被修改，禁止婚姻，並切斷了對夫妻關係的任何法律保護。敵對的政客們在全國掀起了一波憲法修正案的浪潮。

直到 2008 年，GLAD 才在康乃狄克州最高法院取得了下一場持久的勝利。 克里根和莫克訴公共衛生部。 我們將於 11 月 12 日在康乃狄克州慶祝結婚 15 週年，就在 20^日週年紀念日 古德里奇.

康乃狄克州案之後，我們開始看到更多州法院、立法機構和投票在婚姻自由方面取得勝利。

至關重要的立法在新英格蘭州（佛蒙特州、緬因州和新罕布夏州）爭取婚姻平等的勝利證明了我們能夠透過民主程序而非僅僅依靠法院來實現變革。 2012年，緬因州不得不重新進行公投，該州也因此成為第一個透過民眾投票贏得婚姻的州。 2013年初，我們在新英格蘭州的競選活動隨著羅德島州婚姻法的通過而圓滿結束。

慢慢地，但越來越明顯的是，越來越多的公眾開始關注並接受 LGBTQ+ 個體和我們關係的尊嚴和平等。

從馬薩諸塞州的州憲法案件到全國婚姻勝利的歷程 奧貝格費爾訴霍奇斯案 2015年最高法院的判決，是社會和法律領域眾多人士改變思想、辛勤工作、勇氣、韌性和堅持不懈的成果。正如酷兒歷史學家喬治‧昌西所說， 奧貝格費爾 沒有 古德里奇，我們很高興地為 14 位開創性的原告們歡呼。

鞏固聯邦法律中的尊嚴與平等 

President BIden signing the RMA surrounded by legislators, outside of the White House — 白宮簽名儀式

2022 年 6 月，最高法院法官克拉倫斯·托馬斯呼籲重新考慮 奧貝格費爾 以及其他保護個人自由的關鍵案件——在他同意的 多布斯訴傑克森婦女健康案 這項裁決推翻了50年來墮胎權的先例。這既不是我們第一次，也不是最後一次看到婚姻平等受到直接威脅，但它促使人們多年來一直在採取行動，要求州和聯邦政府承認人們的婚姻，並禁止基於配偶的性別、種族或族裔的歧視。在兩黨的支持下，拜登總統於2022年12月簽署了聯邦《尊重婚姻法案》，向全國各地的LGBTQ+家庭和其他群體保證，他們的婚姻將繼續受到州和聯邦政府的尊重。

「需要許多人的努力才能扭轉歷史的軌跡，走向正義……即使是現在，我們社區中仍然有很多地方的人們遭受著攻擊。這項工作將繼續下去，但看看我們已經取得了多大的進步。”
– 古德里奇 原告海蒂·諾頓史密斯

我們警惕那些試圖削弱民事婚姻平權以及LGBTQ+族群更廣泛平等地位的行為。這包括製造言論和宗教方面的異議來對抗平等待遇的基本規則，就像今年夏天最高法院狹隘但令人擔憂的判決一樣。 303創意 裁決及其他。我們也看到，各州立法機構普遍威脅LGBTQ+族群在學校、醫療保健場所、公共市場以及其他日常生活領域主張基本人權或法律尊重。在這個極具挑戰性的時期，我們的社區正在加班加點地捍衛和保護彼此，並確認我們所知道的正確和正確的事情。

雖然這場鬥爭很艱難，但我們知道，我們可以克服公眾理解方面的損失和差距，就像我們在婚姻、將親密關係定為犯罪的法律、我們社區對艾滋病毒流行的反應以及二十年來跨性別者權利的進步一樣，他們現在正面臨毀滅性的反彈……這絕非易事，也不是立竿見影的，但當我們懷著愛和承諾長期共同努力時，我們就會勝利。

“需要許多人的努力才能讓歷史的弧線轉向正義。” 古德里奇 原告海蒂·諾頓史密斯在白宮簽署《尊重婚姻法案》時說。即使現在，我們社區中仍有許多地方的人們遭受攻擊。這項工作將繼續下去，但看看我們已經取得了多大的進步。拜登總統今天簽署的法律將使人們更加安全、更有保障，不再孤獨。我們全家感謝你們所有人為我們平等的人性和尊嚴而奮鬥，為我們愛與被愛的權利而奮鬥，也為我們的婚姻而奮鬥。

未竟之業：確保我們家庭的保護

Selfie of MA parent with child smiling — MA 家長 Kam 和她的兒子

如今，馬薩諸塞州以其在婚姻平等方面的領導地位而自豪，這理所當然。但二十年後，這里程碑式的 古德里奇 裁決指出，麻州仍有許多未竟之事，需要確保LGBTQ+家庭（包括我們的孩子）能夠透過與父母建立法律聯繫而獲得充分的保護。馬薩諸塞州關於確立親子關係（即兒童與父母之間的法律關係）的法規仍然落後數十年。因此，LGBTQ+家庭所生子女以及其他透過輔助生殖技術出生的子女處於弱勢地位，缺乏法律保障，無法承認他們與父母的關係。我們需要立法機構在今年採取行動，通過《麻州親子關係法案》，制定一份平等保護所有家庭的法定路線圖。

這個故事最初發表在 2023 年秋季 GLAD Briefs 時事通訊中。閱讀更多.

部落格

家 » National/Federal » Page 11

Our Fight for LGBTQ+ Youth

We’ve been working together for decades to make sure LGBTQ+ youth have the support and freedom they need to be themselves and thrive as part of their communities.

From establishing the right for gay students to enjoy Prom with their boyfriend or girlfriend like any other kid, to making sure transgender students can participate in school on the same terms as everyone else, GLAD – and you – have worked alongside inspiring LGBTQ+ young people to imagine and create a better world.

Now, with new waves of attacks against LGBTQ+ youth, we must continue to protect the vision we share for a safer and more free future.

With your support, GLAD is:

Fighting to protect access to established medical care that helps transgender youth survive and thrive.

This week, we asked the full 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to preserve a federal district court decision blocking Alabama’s ban on healthcare for transgender youth.

As GLAD’s Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights, Jennifer Levi said:

“Enforcement of Alabama’s criminal transgender healthcare ban will harm thousands of transgender adolescents across Alabama and will put Alabama parents in the excruciating position of not being able to get the medical care their children need to thrive. We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.”

Defending supportive school policies that enable trans youth and all students to learn and grow.

Today, the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals is hearing an important case on whether schools can support transgender students even if some parents disagree. We submitted a friend of the court brief with the MA Superintendent’s Association, sharing research that shows positive school climates and trusted relationships with adults are critical to academic success for all students.

As Mary Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies, said:

“When teachers and other educators acknowledge and respect students, including their requested names and pronouns, that creates the safety that allows brain development and learning to flourish while also meeting the requirement of equal educational opportunity. Parents have a right to be involved in their children’s education, but parents and students have navigated these and other issues before without a new constitutional mandate of disclosure and can do so today.”

Ensuring students can learn about themselves and the world around them without bans on important topics like LGBTQ+ identities, race, and racism.

Last month, GLAD and our partners asked a federal district court in New Hampshire to declare the state’s harmful “Banned Concepts” law unconstitutional.

As GLAD Attorney Chris Erchull said:

“Public school teachers work hard every day to ensure students can develop the knowledge and critical thinking skills they need to be successful and contribute to their communities. Teachers can’t do that effectively when they are subject to this vague law, with no guidance, that forces them to limit class discussions and avoid certain important topics altogether. LGBTQ+, BIPOC, and students with disabilities are being especially harmed, but the chilling effect of this law is doing a severe disservice to all students, when their teachers can’t ensure they gain a full, rich understanding of history and the people and world around them.”

With your help, GLAD will never stop working to support LGBTQ+ youth and secure a better future for all of us.

Support this important work

訊息

家 » National/Federal » Page 11

GLAD Cheers Federal Department of Health and Human Services Move to Strengthen Non-discrimination Protections for LGBTQ+ People Accessing Vital Programs

GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) is pleased that the Biden Administration has moved to prevent discrimination against LGBTQ+ people in important social services programs funded by the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

“At a time when many state legislatures are working overtime to prevent LGBTQ+ people—particularly transgender people—from accessing health care and essential services, we appreciate the Biden Administration’s move to clearly ensure protection for the constitutional rights of LGBTQ+ people and their families to receive services they need to maintain their health and well-being,” said Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders.

訊息

家 » National/Federal » Page 11

Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in 303 Creative訴Elenis

In a 6-3 ruling today the U.S. Supreme Court issued a highly fact-specific decision authorizing a narrow exception to a state nondiscrimination law for a website developer whose work it found involves selecting customers to convey the designer’s message. While the case allows for the first time a limited First Amendment exemption from laws requiring businesses open to the public to offer the goods and services they sell without discrimination, the unusual nature of the transaction in the case suggests the ruling has virtually no application to the overwhelming majority of businesses providing goods and services to the public.

Based on the facts agreed upon by the parties, the Court found that the seller vets and endorses each client, meets with the couple to discuss “unique” stories, creates original artwork, designs and text for each, and explicitly expresses her support for their wedding. All of this, the Court said, pointed to the “expressive” nature of her conduct and justied a narrow exception to the nondiscrimination law. This is different from virtually all businesses that sell goods and services to the public and does not reflect how the overwhelming majority of companies operate.

Mary Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, issued the following statement:

“While today’s ruling is extremely limited, we are disappointed to see that for the first time, and in the context of LGBTQ+ people who are already facing a “heartbreaking” “backlash to the movement for liberty and equality for gender and sexual minorities,” as the dissent noted, an unprecedented exemption to nondiscrimination laws that have always been considered to forbid conduct, not speech. This is not the broad victory Lorie Smith and her counsel sought – today’s ruling importantly upholds the validity of nondiscrimination laws, including for LGBTQ+ people who may obtain goods and services ‘on the same terms offered to other members of the public’ – but it is not the end of efforts to push LGBTQ+ people and couples into a second class status. GLAD and our movement will resist that effort every step of the way.

For decades, case law and public agreement have upheld the principle that nondiscrimination laws are bound up with first principles of equality, with mutual respect and civic unity, and with our need for goods and services no matter who and where we are. It is crucial to ensure today’s ruling remains limited to the highly specific and customized services the Court found in this case, and is not seen as a green light to assert a free speech defense in other areas of law. Denying services to same-sex couples is out of step with what the vast majority of Americans believe, and the overwhelming majority of Americans, including business owners, strive to treat everyone with dignity and respect as they too want to be treated. Today’s decision from the Supreme Court does not change that.

LGBTQ+ people are family members, co-workers, business owners, and customers in every community and we remain committed to working alongside our neighbors to ensure all people can go about our daily lives and access the goods and services we need without discrimination. As Justice Kennedy summarized for several of the current justices in Masterpiece Cakeshop just 5 years ago, ‘religious and philosophical objections of business owners and other actors in the economy and in society” do not suffice to ‘deny protected persons equal access to goods and services” under public accommodations laws like Colorado’s.’ We will fight to maintain that principle for 全部 of the people protected by nondiscrimination laws.”

GLAD submitted a friend of the Court brief in this case for GLAD, NCLR, Lambda Legal, HRC, The Task Force, and thanks White & Case for its assistance.

訪問 303 Creative訴Elenis case page.

訊息

家 » National/Federal » Page 11

Statement of Janson Wu, Executive Director of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, on the Supreme Court’s Ruling on Affirmative Action in College Admissions

“Today’s majority opinion ending the consideration of race as one of many factors for qualified students in college admissions ignores the substantial factual record supporting the lawfulness of Harvard and University of North Carolina’s admissions programs and discounts present and past racial inequities the 14thAmendment to our constitution was intended to address. Equal educational opportunities are fundamental to reducing barriers to economic, leadership, and other life opportunities, to ensuring full participation and a diversity of perspectives in a robust, multi-racial democracy, and to realizing freedom for all.

The benefits that accrue to all students from being able to learn from others of different perspectives and experiences, and to build respect for one another, cannot be overstated. I attended Harvard College as an Asian-American student in the late 1990s. Coming from a predominantly white community in rural upstate New York, the racial diversity of students and backgrounds opened a new world of experiences and relationships that led to greater growth, learning, and discovery.

Today’s decision will make it harder for colleges and universities to provide that same learning environment that benefited me and all students, including Asian-American students – but we cannot and will not turn our backs on that goal.

As Justice Jackson plainly put it in her dissent in the North Carolina case: The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together, collectively striving to achieve true equality for all Americans.

While the Court has spoken as to admissions, it remains true that life experiences, including those related to a person’s race, are matters that can be lifted up by prospective students and sought and considered by educational institutions in line with their missions. We must and will keep working together to ensure every student has the opportunity to pursue their dreams.”

了解更多案件信息.

訊息

家 » National/Federal » Page 11

HIV Medicine Association and National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors Warn of Tens of Thousands of New HIV Cases and Billions in Health Care Costs if Decision in 布雷德伍德訴貝塞拉 is Allowed to Stand

The organizations, which represent thousands of healthcare providers, public officials, and policy experts with expertise in the treatment and prevention of HIV and the demographics and dynamics of the epidemic, filed a friend-of-the-court brief today in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

The HIV Medicine Association (HIVMA) and the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD) today filed a 法庭之友陳述 at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, urging reversal of the federal district court order in 布雷德伍德訴貝塞拉. That ruling blocked a requirement under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that insurers cover designated preventive care services, including HIV PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis), without cost sharing. HIV PrEP is an extraordinary medical breakthrough that reduces the risk of HIV transmission by close to one hundred percent.

The brief was authored by attorneys at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders and the law firm Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

NASTAD and HIVMA include thousands of physicians and other healthcare providers with expertise in the treatment and prevention of HIV; government public officials from every state responsible for stopping the epidemic; and policy experts who understand the demographics and dynamics of the epidemic. Their brief lays out critical information demonstrating how requiring copays and deductibles for PrEP will significantly decrease utilization of PrEP, cause tens of thousands of new and preventable HIV cases, with billions of dollars in associated healthcare costs, and reverse the progress our nation has made towards curbing, and ultimately ending, the HIV epidemic.

“As an organization representing thousands of physicians and other health care professionals working on the frontlines of the HIV epidemic in communities across the country, we are deeply concerned about the harmful and far-reaching impacts this decision will have if allowed to stand,” said Michelle Cespedes, MD, MS, Chair, HIVMA. “Reinstating cost-sharing for PrEP would directly cause tens of thousands of preventable cases of HIV transmission and set back decades of progress toward curbing the epidemic.”

While the ruling from the Texas court in 布雷德伍德訴貝塞拉 broadly enjoined the cost-sharing mandate for all recommended preventive services, the case began as a challenge specifically to the requirement to cover PrEP without copays or deductibles. The brief filed today provides the Court of Appeals with important historical and current-day information about the tremendous toll the HIV epidemic has had on millions of lives, as well as the role discrimination and stigma have played in preventing Americans from accessing highly effective prevention and treatment.

“The 布雷德伍德 decision is rooted in stigma and bigotry towards the LGBTQ+ community and people vulnerable to HIV,” said Dr. Stephen Lee, NASTAD Executive Director. “It will cause incalculable harm to our efforts to end the HIV epidemic. We are pleased to join HIVMA in filing an amicus brief to help offer insight into why this decision is so detrimental to our HIV/AIDS public health system.”

The brief cites a recent epidemiological analysis conducted by experts at Harvard and Yale predicting, under the most cautious and conservative estimates, that blocking the ACA’s no cost sharing provision for PrEP will result in an additional 2,057 HIV infections in the first year alone. Including an additional predicted 1,892 secondary infections brings that number to 3,949 people with HIV in just the first year, which will cost the healthcare system a staggering $1.66 billion. Extending that conservative model just five years into the future predicts approximately an additional 20,000 people with HIV and costs to the United States healthcare system of over $8 billion as a result of the reimposition of barriers to accessing PrEP.

The brief also describes the sobering and unacceptable racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in both the impact of the epidemic and access to PrEP. In 2021, the CDC estimates that only 11% of Black people and 20% of Hispanic/Latino people who could benefit from PrEP were prescribed it, as opposed to 78% of White people. In the same year, more than half (52%) of new HIV infections were in the U.S. South, yet the states with the highest unmet need for PrEP are Alabama, Arkansas, South Carolina, and Mississippi.

“Copays and deductibles deter people from accessing healthcare,” said Ben Klein, Senior Director of Litigation and HIV Law at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. “PrEP is nearly 100% effective at preventing transmission of HIV but it is already underutilized, particularly among Black and Latino communities. As the brief filed today by HIVMA and NASTAD demonstrates, allowing the lower court’s ruling in 布雷德伍德訴貝塞拉 to stand will exacerbate racial health disparities, increase new HIV diagnoses by the tens of thousands, and have devastating consequences on our efforts to end the epidemic. GLAD is pleased to partner with the HIVMA, NASTAD, and the law firm Mintz to ensure that the Court of Appeals understands the devastating consequences for HIV prevention if the District Court’s decision stands.”

“The brief filed today by HIVMA and NASTAD underscores the fact that tens of thousands of American lives and billions of dollars of healthcare costs are literally in the balance with the outcome of this case,” said Drew DeVoogd, Member, Mintz. “Mintz is happy to work with GLAD, HIVMA, and NASTAD to highlight the massive human harm and economic cost the District Court’s decision will have if it is allowed to stand, eroding many years of hard-won public health progress in the fight against the HIV epidemic.”

Read the brief