Massachusetts Know Your Rights - Page 19 of 40 - GLAD Law
Skip Header to Content
GLAD Logo Skip Primary Navigation to Content

News

On October 8, 2019, Senior Staff Attorney Patience Crozier submitted testimony in support of H. 1004 / S. 560, An Act Relative to Preserving Fertility. This legislation represents an important step forward in ensuring access to fertility preservation for Massachusetts residents. Providing access to insurance coverage for fertility preservation is critical to ensuring individuals and couples can realize their dream of building families.

Although current law has helped many people facing fertility-related challenges in creating their families, others continue to experience difficulties because of a lack of access to fertility preservation. For those with certain illnesses or medical conditions, they strive to preserve their own fertility to further their dream of one day creating a family. Currently, fertility preservation is financially out of reach for many, and this legislation will increase access in a meaningful way. Providing such access is of particular importance to transgender people receiving gender-affirming healthcare, since such treatment often results in fertility impairment. In passing this bill Massachusetts would continue its history of pro-family policy-making by updating state law to ensure that those who have certain medical or genetic conditions are supported in their aspirations to build a family.

You can find the entire testimony here:

GLAD testimony in support of fertility preservation

News

On October 8, 2019, Senior Staff Attorney Bennett Klein delivered testimony at the Massachusetts State House in Boston in support of S.905 and H.1341, an act to collect data on LGBTQ incarcerated people held in restrictive housing.

LGBTQ people, particularly low-income LGBTQ people and LGBTQ people of color, are disproportionately incarcerated and unduly subjected to solitary confinement (referred to as restrictive housing), a profoundly harmful practice that the United Nations has categorized as torture. It is imperative that Massachusetts end the discriminatory treatment of LGBTQ people in restrictive housing and the criminal justice system.

Once incarcerated, LGBTQ people face discrimination, humiliation, abuse and assault at disturbingly high levels. The unwarranted and discriminatory use of restrictive housing with respect to LGBTQ people is among the most harrowing of these disparities.

The full testimony can be downloaded here:

Restrictive Housing Data Bill Testimony

GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders Welcomes New Board Members

(Boston, MA) GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) is thrilled to announce the appointment of three new board members: Jessyca Feliciano, Matthew McGuirk, and Spencer Icasiano. These individuals have served the LGBTQ community for many years and bring robust experience in the areas of corporate diversity, financial development, and technology user experience.

“With their commitment to GLAD’s mission and work, Jessyca, Matthew, and Spencer’s diverse talents will add to the Board’s strength, making us even more ready to face the challenges ahead. We are excited to welcome three people with such varied professional backgrounds and passion for LGBTQ equality,” said Executive Director Janson Wu.

Jessyca Feliciano is a Vice President of Employee Relations at State Street Corporation, helping manage the relationships between the organization and its employees. Prior to joining State Street, Jessyca held positions of increasing responsibility in corporate and non-profit organizations, most recently with Mass Mutual as a Human Resources Business Partner supporting the Data Science and Digital Design corporate groups and their leaders. In addition to her primary responsibilities, Jessyca also served as a diversity and inclusion liaison, holding the business accountable for implementing diversity best practices and strategies. She started her career in social work working with at risk youth in underprivileged communities, always focusing on creating opportunities of inclusion, which is still something very close to her heart. Jessyca earned a Master of Education with a focus on Organizational Development and Leadership from Cambridge College’s Graduate School of Education, and a Bachelor’s in Social Work from Roberts Wesleyan College.

Matthew McGuirk is a Financial Advisor with Morgan Stanley. He has worked in asset & wealth management for over 20 years, currently focusing his practice on serving the LGBTQ community. In his public service life, he serves on several boards & committees that support this community and is honored to begin work on the Development Committee of GLAD’s Board. Matt particularly looks forward to building bridges between organizations with which he has ties, such as the MA LGBT Chamber of Commerce where he is a founding partner, and other non-profits such as Community Research Initiative where he is a member of the Board; Fenway Health where he is a member of the Board of Visitors; and the Human Rights Campaign, where he is a member of the New England Steering Committee and Co-Chair of the Federal Club for New England. Outside of his advocacy work, Matt also enjoys theater, and serves on the Board of Directors of New Repertory Theater. While he is committed to all areas of GLAD’s work, he has a particular interest in protecting children and the elderly and has been involved with organizations such as the LGBT Community Center and SAGE. He is a graduate of Hampden-Sydney College, and holds an Executive Certificate in Financial Planning from Georgetown University and a Master of Science in Financial Planning from Bentley University.

Spencer Icasiano is a product designer at HubSpot, and a user experience specialist who has held previous positions at Care.com and Wayfair. Spencer has consulted on and designed tech platforms that create seamless experiences for clients and customers. In addition to their day job, they work as a contributing writer for 90.9 WBUR, covering primarily QTPOC (queer and trans people of color) artists and activists whose cultural impacts are directly shaping the future of Boston. The beginning of Spencer’s connection to GLAD was as a resource – GLAD provided support to Spencer through a violent and transphobic landlord situation, as well as gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment instances in their career. Spencer’s natural inquisitiveness and pursuit of justice has spilled over into other areas of their life and thanks in part to GLAD’s impact they’ve been able to successfully advocate for employee environment and policy improvements and consulted on inclusive hiring practices at public tech companies. Spencer’s public speaking skills have been cultivated at professional conferences, engineering bootcamps, and local institutions—from world-class universities to Fortune 100 corporations—where they lead talks and workshops on topics of cultural competency and organizational change.  Spencer earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Writing from Emerson College.

Jessyca, Matthew and Spencer join current board members Joyce Kauffman (President), Darian Butcher (Vice President), Marlene Seltzer (Treasurer), Leila Bailey-Stewart, Edward Byrne, Francisco Cabas, Martha Holt Castle, Fred Csibi-Levin, Liz Doherty, Shane Dunn, Joseph Garland, George Hastie, David Hayter, Dianne Phillips, Lee Swislow, and Richard Yurko.

 

Through strategic litigation, public policy advocacy, and education, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders works in New England and nationally to create a just society free of discrimination based on gender identity and expression, HIV status, and sexual orientation.

Joint Statement of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) and Massachusetts Trans Political Coalition (MTPC) on the Treatment of Individuals Arrested for Protesting ‘Straight Pride’ Parade in Boston

       GLAD logoMTPC logo            

We are profoundly disturbed by the events surrounding the ‘Straight Pride’ parade in Boston on August 31, including the cascading missteps surrounding the counter-protest and its aftermath, at the hands of the police and the justice system. They are reminders of how far we have to go before our lesbian, gay, bisexual, and especially transgender communities can trust that our voices will be heard, and our identities respected, in the public square, without fear of mistreatment or discrimination.

The individuals who gathered to protest the ‘Straight Pride’ parade did so to voice disagreement with the event’s extremist messages, including the message that LGBTQ people are not “normal.” Such dehumanizing statements, made by parade organizers who have ties to White Supremacist and other alt-right ideologies, threaten not only the dignity but also the safety of LGB and especially transgender lives.

Our aspirations for equal justice in our nation require protection of avenues of dissent. And yet, the heavy-handed police tactics at the rally, resulting in the arrests of protesters, threatens to squelch the voices of marginalized people, particularly the transgender community who already experience harassment and discrimination at the hands of the police.

What happened subsequently in the courtroom did little to restore our community’s trust in the justice system. While prosecutors, under the leadership of Suffolk County District Attorney Rachel Rollins, tried to do the right thing by declining to prosecute the minor charges levied against the protesters, Suffolk Municipal Court Judge Sinnott refused to defer to prosecutorial discretion and instead insisted that many of these charges go forward. Judicial resources are not well spent on prosecuting people who showed up at a rally to engage civic values of discourse.

To make matters worse, Judge Sinnott later mistreated one defendant, Kai De Jesus, a transgender woman of color, with humiliating and dehumanizing statements about her gender and name, including equating her name with a criminal alias. Whether intentional or not, comments like those made by Judge Sinnott send the message to transgender people that they may not receive a fair hearing in court – the opposite of the expectation we should be ensuring all residents of the Commonwealth can confidently hold with regards to our justice system.

But we have the power to change that. In 2018 the trial court created a mandated training, required of every trial court employee, including judges, setting out expectations for fair, respectful and inclusive treatment of transgender people in our courts. Last week demonstrated how critical such trainings are to continue on an ongoing basis for all court staff, including the judges who are entrusted with delivering unbiased justice.

Last year the Massachusetts community voted overwhelmingly to uphold protections for transgender individuals in public spaces, including on the streets and in the courts. It is up to all of us to live up to our collective aspirations of upholding fairness, dignity, and respect for LGB and transgender people, and for all people in the Commonwealth.

 

###

Through strategic litigation, public policy advocacy, and education, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders works in New England and nationally to create a just society free of discrimination based on gender identity and expression, HIV status, and sexual orientation. GLAD participated in the development of the 2018 trial court training on inclusive and respectful treatment of transgender people in the court system.

The Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition (MTPC) is dedicated to ending oppression and discrimination on the basis on gender identity and gender expression. Rooted in social justice, we educate the public; advocate with state, local and federal government; engage in activism; and encourage the empowerment of community members through collective action. MTPC offers regular trainings throughout the state on trans and non-binary identities and on developing accessibility and inclusion for trans and non-binary communities.

Blog

Imagine being at the hospital as your child is born and worrying they might not be able to go home with you if something were to happen to your partner who had given birth. Imagine not being able to pick your child up from daycare, or take them to see a doctor. Imagine something happening to your partner and child services seeking to take custody because your child has no other legal parent. These are all real concerns that new parents have when they are not legally recognized—and new parents have enough on their plate as it is in the best of circumstances.

“I was not his birth parent and I wasn’t able to put my name on his birth certificate before we left the hospital. A birth certificate is the first and sometimes only legal link that a parent has with his/her child. It is a very, very big deal. My partner and I took the exact same steps as our “straight” infertile friends in conceiving, but we were denied the ability to put both of our names on the birth certificate just on the basis of our sex alone.”

Access to legal parentage shouldn’t depend on a family’s economic means, on whether the parents are of the same gender or different genders, or on how that family is formed. But our state laws haven’t kept up with the different ways that we form our families, including using assisted reproductive technology or having children before or without getting married. Even in New England, where we benefit from robust anti-discrimination laws, there remain significant gaps in parentage laws that force parents to undergo time-consuming, expensive and invasive processes in order to protect their relationship with their children. Many of these laws haven’t been updated since the 1970s.

Using the Uniform Parentage Act of 2017 (UPA) as model legislation, GLAD Senior Staff Attorney Patience Crozier has been collaborating with other advocates to advance parentage law reform in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Hampshire. The UPA and the state-specific bills modeled on it update the laws’ understanding of family to reflect present-day reality and to ensure accessible and nondiscriminatory paths to establishing parentage. This includes ensuring that LGBTQ families using assisted reproduction have access to parentage through the Voluntary Acknowledgement of Parentage process, which enables parents to secure their legal relationships to their children immediately at birth and without going to court. These reforms resonate with so many in the LGBTQ community and beyond who simply seek equal and fair means to secure their parent-child relationships.

The Rhode Island Parentage Act (RIPA) had substantial momentum and support in the 2019 legislative session. The bill passed unanimously in the Senate and had considerable support in the House where it was also poised to pass until the Chief Judge of the Family Court intervened unexpectedly. Despite having been consulted for his input prior to the bill’s filing, the Chief Judge engaged only at the last minute to request further study. The House created a study commission that will convene this fall to review the RIPA and move these critically important reforms forward. As a community, Rhode Island is galvanized to move this legislation forward and to ensure all children and families have equal access to parentage. GLAD will participate on the study commission, and remains committed to this legislative effort, and to sharing the stories of families who have experienced the difficult and painful impact of outdated parentage laws.

Parents Sara and Anna experienced the effects of Rhode Island’s outdated law firsthand when they started their family. Their son, Eli, was conceived using assisted reproduction. Because they were unmarried, Sara, as the non-birth parent, had no presumed legal parental connection to Eli at birth, and no route to establish her parentage.

“I was not his birth parent and I wasn’t able to put my name on his birth certificate before we left the hospital, which I know, sounds like a formality but it is not. A birth certificate is the first and sometimes only legal link that a parent has with his/her child. It is a very, very big deal. My partner and I took the exact same steps as our “straight” infertile friends in conceiving, but we were denied the ability to put both of our names on the birth certificate just on the basis of our sex alone.”

It took 8 months for Sara to adopt her own son – an excruciatingly long time to be in legal limbo, particularly when it comes to your child. What’s more, during all those months, Sara and Anna were subjected to the lengthy, invasive, and at times arbitrary steps of the adoption process, including putting an ad in the paper to notify the anonymous sperm donor of the pending adoption, in case he wanted to challenge the termination of his “parental rights.”

Rhode Island LGBTQ parents aren’t alone in seeking legislation to protect their families. Maine and Vermont both have passed comprehensive parentage reform, but the rest of New England has a ways to go.

Though Massachusetts now allows same-gender parents to sign a VAP, there are still barriers to establishing legal parentage within the Commonwealth. The MA Parentage Act is a sensible update to MA law that ensures all children and families have equal access to establishing parentage, and corrects discrimination that exists in the current state law. A public hearing on the MPA took place in early September.

In Connecticut, a coalition is working on draft legislation to update the state’s parentage laws, and we are hopeful that legislation will be filed in 2020. Similar efforts are also underway in New Hampshire, where statutes do exist to protect children born through ART and surrogacy, but where gaps in the law still still exist.

Love makes families, but we all agree the law needs to protect them. Continuing to operate with outdated, decades-old statutes leaves some children and families unprotected. GLAD is committed to ensuring that all children and families have access to the fundamental protection of legal parentage.

News

After Winning a Landmark Case to be Housed According to Her Gender, Transgender Advocate Angelina Resto is Determined to Fight for Her Incarcerated and Formerly Incarcerated LGBT Family

Last fall, Angelina Resto succeeded in her effort to be transferred from a Massachusetts men’s prison facility, where she faced brutal daily harassment and threats to her safety, to the state’s women’s facility. She was the first transgender woman in Massachusetts to secure a transfer to be housed according to her gender, and the first in the country to secure such a transfer as the result of a court order. GLAD represented Angelina together with Prisoners Legal Services and Goodwin, in her landmark case, Doe v. Massachusetts Department of Correction.

Angelina has since completed her sentence, but her commitment to advocacy on behalf of transgender and LGB people who are incarcerated continues. She aims to share her story as widely as possible in order to keep others from experiencing what she went through. “I’m a transgender woman, and have been living as a woman since an early age. I came out as transgender at 11,” says Angelina, who is now 55. Despite this fact, she was housed at MCI Norfolk, a men’s prison facility. “I was discriminated against as a transgender woman [at MCI Norfolk]. I was taunted and sexually harassed by guards and abused by other inmates.” She was made to shower in front of male inmates and guards, and lived in daily fear of assault.

Angelina decided to fight for better treatment and to be transferred to the women’s facility after connecting with another inmate who supported and encouraged her. “I met a wonderful guy,” she says. “He is the one who pushed me to do what I did to get transferred. We were afraid I was going to be put in solitary confinement, and I am not a person who can deal with confinement. It is very hard to be locked up like that.” He suggested she reach out to Prisoners Legal Services (PLS).

Kate Piper, a paralegal at PLS, raised concerns about the treatment Angelina was experiencing. “She started writing letters, asking what was happening, saying that I was being mistreated, that I couldn’t even shower with any privacy. She told them that I am a woman,” and shouldn’t be in the men’s facility. Ultimately, Kate and Lizz Matos at PLS connected with GLAD’s Transgender Rights Project Director Jennifer Levi and Senior Attorney Ben Klein, and attorneys Anthony Downes, Louis Lobel, Ashley Drake and Tiffany Moore of Goodwin, to file suit on Angelina’s behalf.

Angelina also had other LGBT people in mind when she decided to act, adding, “These people were not doing what they were supposed to be doing for transgender women. If they were doing it to me, it was going to happen to other transgender women and other members of the LGBT family at MCI Norfolk. I kept fighting because I saw what they were doing was wrong.”

Beyond what it meant for her own life to win her case and be transferred to MCI Framingham, Angelina is incredibly proud of the impact her fight will have on others. “I have opened many doors for transgender women so they don’t suffer the abuse I have suffered,” she says. “No one from the LGBTQ community who is incarcerated should be treated like I was being treated. I want people to understand that we are human beings. We aren’t animals. We aren’t just a number. It’s bad enough you’ve taken away our freedom but don’t take away our dignity and our pride.”

News

Gov. Baker’s administration has taken a further step in supporting transgender servicemembers in the MA National Guard.

The Executive Office of Public Safety and Security (EOPSS) issued a letter saying:

“The Massachusetts National Guard and the Baker-Polito Administration will continue to support transgender Soldiers and Airmen in serving our Commonwealth with dignity and respect,” and “will continue to assist in the endorsement of waivers and exceptions in accordance with federal policy in order to support accession and retention of the best qualified individuals in our military force regardless of their gender identity.”

This is great news and is the result of efforts from several MA legislators, as well as GLAD. We thank the hard work of Senators Eric P. Lesser and Julian Cyr, as well as Representative Mindy Domb for all their hard work.

“We applaud Governor Baker for recognizing that excluding qualified transgender servicemembers from the National Guard weakens our military and demeans the Commonwealth’s core values of fairness and equal treatment. We appreciate the commitment of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security to ensuring that transgender individuals who meet military standards have every possible opportunity to serve their country and the Commonwealth. Citizens of the birthplace of the National Guard deserve no less,” said Jennifer L. Levi, Director of the Transgender Rights Project at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) and one of the leading attorneys challenging the transgender military ban in court.

You can read the full press release from Sen. Lesser’s office here.

Pangborn v. Ascend

Hospice nurse Alexander Pangborn is fighting for basic healthcare coverage.

YouTube video

Update: December 16, 2020. Judge Mastroianni issued an order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss, allowing the case to continue.

Update: January 10, 2020. GLAD has filed Alexander Pangborn’s case with the Federal Court in Western Massachusetts, and removed the case from the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. This is an important case to break down barriers we still see for transgender people accessing healthcare and fair treatment in the workplace.

GLAD has filed a charge of discrimination with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on behalf of Alexander Pangborn, a hospice care nurse and employee of Ascend who was denied coverage for medically necessary healthcare because he is a transgender man.

Ascend, a hospice and palliative care provider owned by Care One Management, offers health services benefits through a self-funded plan — a type of plan used by many large employers in which the company covers employee healthcare costs directly rather than through an insurance policy.

While seeking medically-necessary gender-affirming healthcare in consultation with his doctor, Pangborn learned that his employer has a blanket exclusion for any healthcare related to gender transition.

The complaint alleges that by treating him differently – not offering him the same benefits other employees get — because he is a transgender man, Pangborn’s employer is discriminating against him in violation of both MA and federal employment law, as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act.

“Honestly, it was very crushing,” Pangborn told the Boston Globe about learning of the exclusion. “My co-workers, we all pay into the same system to receive health care, and you are saying my medically necessary care isn’t necessary. That makes you feel devalued as an employee and also as a person.”

“Healthcare decisions should be made by medical professionals, not by employers,” says GLAD Attorney Chris Erchull. “It is unlawful to single out transgender employees and to give them a lesser employee benefit package than all other employees.”

No Pride in Prison: The Criminalization of LGBTQ People

Join us for a panel discussion about policing and drivers of incarceration, conditions of confinement, and the unique re-entry challenges faced by LGBTQ people, such as finding inclusive and supportive housing.

Fenway Institute Director of Health Policy Research Sean Cahill will moderate our panel.

We will also hear from:

Angelina Resto, Advocate and Public Speaker

Joli Sparkman, Re-entry Coordinator at Bethany House Ministries

Michael Cox, Director of Policy, Black and Pink Boston

Kate Piper, Paralegal, Prisoners’ Legal Services

This event was organized by Black and Pink, Prisoners’ Legal Services, GLAD, and Fenway Health. Co-sponsored by the Criminal Justice Reform caucus and the Black and Latino Caucus.

Lunch will be served.

Worcester Pride 2019!

Come see us at Worcester Pride 2019!

For more information, visit Worcester’s Pride events page.

en_USEnglish
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

To learn more, visit our privacy policy.