Massachusetts Know Your Rights - Page 5 of 40 - GLAD Law
Skip Header to Content
GLAD Logo Skip Primary Navigation to Content

25th Annual Spirit of Justice Award Dinner

25th Annual Spirit of Justice Award Dinner

Friday, October 25  |  Downtown Boston, MA

GLAD Law’s Annual Spirit of Justice Award Dinner is an unforgettable evening of inspiration and connection with our community! This dazzling gala unites supporters of LGBTQ+ rights and equality for an opportunity to find power in resistance; work toward a future of justice, love, and inclusion; and support GLAD Law’s life-changing mission.

Our heartfelt thanks goes out to everyone who joined us on Friday, October 25, 2024 and who supported the 25th Annual Spirit of Justice Award Dinner! The evening brought together supporters of LGBTQ+ equality to recommit to advancing justice with pride, and to celebrate the contributions of our incredible honorees – trailblazing transgender civil rights attorneys Shannon Minter and Jennifer Levi.

We were also thrilled to announce an exciting change for GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. Though our efforts and mission remain the same, we’ll be fighting for LGBTQ+ justice and equality as GLAD Law, rather than simply GLAD. Learn more about the GLAD Law story and get a sneak peek at our updated logo:

YouTube video

Our 2024 Honorees

Individually and working in collaboration, Shannon Minter and Jennifer Levi have been at the forefront of the contemporary LGBTQ+ legal movement for decades, leading legal strategies to secure the civil rights of transgender people, successfully advocating for marriage equality and security for LGBTQ parents, establishing protections for LGBTQ+ youth, and advancing and defending nondiscrimination protections for the LGBTQ+ community. Check out their remarks from the event:

YouTube video
YouTube video

As LGBTQ+ rights are increasingly threatened through legislation and in the courts, Shannon and Jennifer are currently challenging some of the most dangerous anti-LGBTQ+ laws we are facing – laws banning access to essential health care in Florida and Alabama. Learn more about their work.

GLAD Law’s Executive Director, Ricardo Martinez, talked about the future and the importance of hope in GLAD Law’s work:

YouTube video

And thanks to the incredible generosity of our community, the leadership of our individual match donor, and GLAD Law’s Board of Directors, we raised $600,000 and counting to support GLAD Law’s critical work! There’s still time to help us unlock an additional $25,000 by donating before midnight 10/31! Every donation will be matched dollar for dollar by another inspired leadership donor up to $25,000.

Check out these fabulous photos from the event!

Click here to access the full gallery

Want to get involved and support next year’s event?

Contact Josh Arsenault, Assistant Director of Development, at jarsenault@glad.org to become an individual sponsor or join the Host Committee!

For Corporate Sponsorship, contact Aria Pierce, Senior Manager of Institutional Giving, at apierce@glad.org.

Support the Match!

Help GLAD Law unlock another $25,000 by making a gift below. Each donation made before midnight on 10/31 will be matched dollar for dollar up to $25,000!

Fees & Tipping

Covering the fees associated with your transactions is always optional! To opt out of covering the fees in the final step of your transaction, click the blue “Edit” text and uncheck the box labeled “Yes, cover the fees.”

Tipping our platform partner, Givebutter, is also optional! To opt out of tipping, go to the final payment screen of your transaction and click the percentage box in the “Add a tip to support Givebutter” section. Select “Other” and either leave the box blank or type in 0.

Why tip? Tips allow Givebutter to offer their service with no platform fees for the organizations who use it! This reduces the barriers for an organization to start fundraising.

2024 Spirit of Justice Host Committee

Co-Chairs

Gavin Alexander
Jamie Bergeron
Jean-Philip Brignol

Members

Colin Kegler
Joyce Murdoch
Michael Thompson

Sponsors

Presenting

Dr. Samuel Pang at Boston IVF Logo

Diamond

The Herrman Family

Sapphire

Fidelity Investments Logo
Wellington Management Logo

Emerald

Education & Sports Law Group LLC

Goodwin

Shari & Bob Levitan

Opal

Anonymous

Eastern Bank

EY

Holland & Knight

Sarah Kaplan & Anita McGahan

Scott Webster & Peter Black

Platinum

5 Star Travel Tzell

Latham & Watkins LLP

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

WilmerHale

Gold

Advocates for Trans Equality

American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts

American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire

C. Hunter Baker & Bernard F. Gilmore

Boston Scientific

Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP

Equality Federation

The Equality Fund at the Boston Foundation

Equality Maine

Equality Texas

Foley Hoag LLC

Goulston & Storrs

Greater Boston PFLAG

Ralph & Janice James

Keshet

Diane K. Lincoln

Massachusetts Black Lawyers Association

Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition

MassEquality

OUTMetroWest

David Perkins & Willem van Schalkwyk

Qwear Fashion

Alix Ritchie & Marty Davis

Rockland Trust

Skadden

Sidley Austin LLP

Vertex Pharmaceuticals

Victory Programs

YW Boston

Silver

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Hinckley Allen

Lawson & Weitzen, LLP

Prince Lobel Tye LLP

Lee Swislow & Denise McWilliams

United Parish of Auburndale

Womxn of Color Weekend

Janson Wu & Adam Levine

Table Hosts

Anonymous

Akin

Gavin & Angelo Alexander

Carole & Nancy Allen-Scannell

Janice Ambrose & Marlene Seltzer

Bain Capital

Boston College Law School

Jean-Phillip Brignol

Jeff Butts & Ray Cheng

Cabot Corporation

Cambridge Savings Bank

Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP

Anderson Clark, Joanne Herman & Terry Fallon

Deloitte

DLA Piper

Shane Dunn & Elizabeth Bernardi & Family

Nima & Kate Eshghi

Joseph Garland & Philip Haines

Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP

Hogan Lovells

Locke Lord LLP

Julia Slee & Beth Grierson

Khalil Smith, VP, Inclusion, Diversity, and Engagement, Akamai Technologies

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks PC

Updated October 18, 2024

News

GLAD mourns the passing of Larry Kessler, a national leader and community organizer from Boston who helped spearhead Massachusetts and the nation’s response to the AIDS pandemic. 

Larry co-founded AIDS Action Committee (AAC) of Massachusetts in 1983 and led the organization as Executive Director until 2003. He played a leading role in advocating at the state, local, and federal levels for fair and effective AIDS policy and funding.

GLAD, including Senior Director of Litigation and HIV Law Bennett Klein worked closely with Larry while he was at the AAC in the early years of the epidemic. We cherish our memories of keeping community with him at the AIDS Walk, as well as partnering with him and Belynda Dunn, another AIDS justice trailblazer, in the work to ensure access to organ transplants for people living with HIV/AIDS.

Our thoughts are with his husband, friends, and the tremendous activist network he leaves behind. 

L.M. v. Town of Middleborough

Victory! On June 9, 2024, the First Circuit Court of Appeals in L.M. v. Town of Middleborough upheld a lower court’s final ruling in favor of a Massachusetts public middle school. The Court understood the message as striking negatively at the core of identity for students who are transgender or gender nonconforming and found that the school was within its right to keep the student from wearing the t-shirt. The Court affirmed that, while students have a right to free expression, public schools are permitted to prohibit messages that will cause a substantial disruption to the school learning environment.

GLAD Law filed an amicus brief in the First Circuit Court of Appeals in L.M. v. Town of Middleborough. The brief supports a Middleborough public middle school’s decision to prohibit a student, “L.M.,” from wearing a t-shirt containing the message “THERE ARE ONLY TWO GENDERS” in school. We submitted the brief alongside the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents to emphasize (1) the school’s authority to address issues and behavior that can reasonably be predicted to cause substantial disruption to the school learning environment and (2) the harmful impact on student learning for all students when transgender and nonbinary students are targeted for exclusion.

Blog

We can do the impossible. We already have.

By Mary L. Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies

Twenty years ago today, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its watershed decision in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, making Massachusetts the first U.S. state where same-sex couples could legally marry.

That breakthrough ruling spread joy across the state and the country and turbocharged the movement for the legal recognition of LGBTQ+ relationships, ultimately leading to the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision requiring all 50 states to perform and recognize marriages of same-sex couples.

While it’s tempting to look back 20 years and think it was always inevitable, it’s important, especially at the challenging moment we are in, to remember that this is the anniversary of a freedom that once seemed impossible.

It took brave people challenging injustice. The seven Goodridge plaintiff couples not only challenged the law but told the stories of their relationships, their love of one another, and their desire to protect their families to the world. In the process, they, and many others with them, shared, listened, answered questions, and helped build greater understanding and inclusion of LGBTQ+ people.

It took all of us – community members, attorneys, organizers, and allies, to get us to that moment.

Often, what separates the possible and impossible is a plan.

Goodridge wasn’t the first marriage case, nor was it the end of the story.

We supported the Hawaii marriage litigation, and then our own plan began in Vermont. With co-counsel Beth Robinson and Susan Murray, we filed a marriage case, Baker v. State of Vermont, that resulted in the nation’s first ever civil union status.

We translated lessons from Vermont to reach a historic breakthrough and win the first legal marriages in the U.S. in Massachusetts.

This turning point triggered national blowback – from the President, the Congress, then Massachusetts Governor Romney, and legislative attempts to reverse the decision via constitutional amendment. Instead of getting beaten back, we built the foundation of a national movement. And we kept going.

15 years ago, Connecticut’s Supreme Court ruled for us in a 2008 marriage case co-counseled with Ken Bartschi, Karen Dowd, and Maureen Murphy, and supported the whole way by Love Makes A Family. Ben Klein’s argument for the couples led to a breakthrough ruling on the impermissibility of discrimination against LGBTQ+ people.

With longstanding state partners, GLAD worked a plan to win marriage across the New England states. Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine passed the nation’s first marriage laws in 2009, and Maine won the first ballot measure in 2012. Rhode Island’s law made it a wrap in 2013. Passing laws and ballot measures showed what the right wing feared: that people would come to see that more marriages meant more security and happiness for more families.

We took the fight national in 2009, challenging the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on behalf of married couples in Massachusetts whose marriages were disregarded for social security and all federal benefits and responsibilities. We won the first rulings at the federal District and Court of Appeals levels with co-counsel from Jenner & Block, Foley Hoag, and Sullivan & Worcester. We won our second case in Connecticut, too, with couples from Connecticut, Vermont, and New Hampshire. These challenges and the ultimate victory against DOMA which built upon them – U.S. v. Windsor, with counsel Roberta Kaplan in the lead – set the stage for the Supreme Court marriage equality ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Mary Bonauto and Chief Justice Margaret Marshall

Alongside movement partners and courageous plaintiffs, we supported cases nationwide seeking marriage equality. We were asked to join Michigan lawyers representing April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse. By 2015, we were Supreme Court bound to argue for the equal right to marry nationwide.

Getting to a win in Obergefell was a colossal effort of LGBTQ+ legal groups, friends of the court and their attorneys, and so many others. Twenty years after Goodridge, what seemed impossible is the law of the land.

Now, we must do the same thing again.

To be sure, we’ve made tremendous progress for our community.

And yet, we are facing some of the fiercest anti-LGBTQ+ attacks of our lifetimes.

Some people are newly confused and have questions about our community. Consider engaging in a way that invites more conversation and not less.

To be clear, there is also a separate, enormous, coordinated effort to reverse all of the gains we’ve made since the last century on gender and sexual equality.

Our entire community faces revitalized prejudice. The tip of the spear is directed at transgender people and, outrageously, at transgender young people.

In really hard times, when the challenges feel insurmountable, it’s important to understand some of our history. There were losses on the path to victories. And those victories were never inevitable.

What helped bring about transformative change was the strength we drew from one another and growing a movement. Plus, we never quit.

At one time during the marriage equality work, 40 states had either laws, constitutional amendments, or both, that said our relationships were unworthy of recognition. In 1986, the Supreme Court upheld sodomy laws that, in some cases, subjected people to 20-year prison terms for having sex. Yet, against all odds, we overturned those laws, and we will overturn these latest anti-LGBTQ+ laws.

We will always find a path forward.

What matters is all of us, staying engaged, staying positive, and standing up for our commitment to a future of full inclusion, equality, and freedom in which people and communities thrive.

As we joyfully celebrate 20 years of marriage equality, we know we have many miles yet to go to reach that future. But as we travel, let us remember how far we’ve come as fuel for the journey. What seems impossible can be done.

And together, we will do the impossible again.


Find inspiring remarks from the Goodridge plaintiffs, Dee Deidre Farmer, and more at the GLAD’s 2023 Spirit of Justice Award Dinner.

More media about the 20th anniversary of the Goodridge decision:

News

Parents, Advocates, and Lawmakers Testify in Support of Strengthening Legal Protections for Children and Families

Massachusetts Parentage Act Coalition Members inside the MA statehouse
Members of the Massachusetts Parentage Act Coalition at the Judiciary Committee Hearing on November 14, 2023

Families, legal advocates, lawmakers, and others testified in front of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary on Tuesday in support of the Massachusetts Parentage Act (MPA) (S.947/H.1713). The law would increase security for Massachusetts families by ensuring all children, including those born through assisted reproduction, surrogacy, or children born to non-marital or LGBTQ+ parents, have access to parentage, the legal status of the parent-child relationship, and the critical protections necessary for families to thrive.

“Massachusetts has fallen behind the rest of the country in ensuring parental laws reflect and include the diversity of modern-day families, including our LGBTQ+ families, and advances in science,” said Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell. “This legislation would put us back on track by codifying legal protections for parents, regardless of their marital status, gender, or sexual orientation, or how their child was conceived. I strongly support the Massachusetts Parentage Act which will strengthen families, provide stability for our children, and advance reproductive and LGBTQ+ rights across the state.”

The bill has bipartisan support in the House and the Senate.

“Outdated parentage laws have deprived many children across Massachusetts of the security other families take for granted,” said State Representative Sarah Peake (D-Provincetown). “By treating some children as lesser and unequal — namely children born through assisted reproduction, children born through surrogacy, children born to non-marital parents, and children born to LGBTQ parents — our state leaves children vulnerable and undermines their well-being. The time has come to update our laws and provide all families with the legal protections they deserve.”

“This legislation is important to many children and families in the Commonwealth, including mine,” said State Representative Hannah Kane (R-Shrewsbury). “One of my children identifies as a member of the LGBTQ community, and as she makes her way in life, I want to know that she will be able to build her family and raise her children in a state where they are protected, equally, from day one.”

Massachusetts is the only state in New England with outdated parentage laws. Parentage is the legal status of the parent-child relationship which provides legal protections, such as custody and decision-making, and responsibilities, such as child support and health insurance.

“This bill is personal — LGBTQ+ families like mine face excessive and expensive hoops just to ensure our children have the security of legal parentage,” said State Senator Julian Cyr (D-Truro). “Massachusetts has long been a leader in LGBTQ+ equity, yet we have been resting on our laurels when it comes to parentage. With unprecedented and alarming action in other states to strip away the rights of LGBTQ+ people and our families, the Commonwealth’s outdated and heterocentric parentage laws put LGBTQ+ families at risk every day. The Massachusetts Parentage Act is urgently needed so that all children can benefit from the stability of a legal parent-child relationship no matter how they came to be in this world.”

“No child in Massachusetts should be subjected to the uncertainty and hardship caused by the absence of clearly written laws and the inconsistency of court decisions in that absence,” said State Senator Bruce Tarr (R-Gloucester). “Passing the Massachusetts Parentage Act will create clear legal pathways to establish parentage in an efficient and predictable manner that will benefit children and families.”

The MPA would ensure parents in Massachusetts have the ability to provide health insurance, make medical decisions – including in an emergency – make school decisions, as well as decisions about custody and parenting time, inheritance, and designating their children as beneficiaries of social security benefits.

Twenty years after Massachusetts became the first state to ensure LGBTQ+ equality in marriage, the Commonwealth’s outdated laws still leave children of LGBTQ+ parents vulnerable.

“The security of legal parentage is critical for children’s wellbeing, yet Massachusetts currently operates an unconstitutional system that renders some children and families second-class outsiders,” said Patience Crozier, Director of Family Advocacy for GLAD. “For far too many families their only recourse is for parents to adopt their own children – a burdensome, slow, expensive, and humiliating process that isn’t even accessible to all who need it. Without this law, children – particularly those of LGBTQ families – will remain vulnerable outsiders.”

“The world my children, 2 and 5 at the time, and I knew came crashing down when Massachusetts’ outdated parentage laws said I was not their parent,” said parent Karen Partanen. “They couldn’t understand why Mommy wasn’t there anymore. I spent three years and all my savings fighting to secure their equal rights through the courts. While I was eventually successful, seven years later, other children are still in limbo as other parents navigate years of family court, just to secure rights for their children that should be clear under our laws.”

Learn more about the MPA and how to get involved: MassParentage.org

Watch the hearing:

YouTube video

News

Celebrating Two Decades of Marriage Equality on the Anniversary of the Landmark Goodridge v. Department of Public Health Ruling

To mark the 20th anniversary of the culture-shifting Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling, GLAD will present the Goodridge plaintiffs with the 2023 Spirit of Justice Award

Twenty years ago, on Nov. 18, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its watershed decision in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, making Massachusetts the first U.S. state where same-sex couples could legally marry. 

“The Massachusetts Constitution affirms the dignity and equality of all Individuals,” Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall wrote in her powerful majority ruling, which continues to be included in wedding celebrations. “It forbids the creation of second-class citizens.”

GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) will celebrate this historic anniversary by presenting the Spirit of Justice Award to the 14 Goodridge plaintiffs: Gloria Bailey-Davies, Linda Bailey-Davies, Edward Balmelli, Maureen Brodoff, Gary Chalmers, Rob Compton, Hillary Goodridge, Julie Goodridge, Michael Horgan, Richard Linnell, Gina Nortonsmith, Heidi Nortonsmith, Ellen Wade, and David Wilson. The awards will be presented at the 24th Annual Spirit of Justice Award Dinner on November 9th in Boston.

GLAD filed Goodridge in April 2001 on behalf of the plaintiffs, who comprised seven couples who sought marriage licenses to achieve legal respect and protection for their relationships butwere denied because they were same-sex couples. Over the course of the litigation, the plaintiffs opened aspects of their lives to the courts, the press, and the public, and by doing so, the public saw their love and commitment for each other and their families, and their vulnerabilities as partners and parents because they could not marry. Following the SJC decision in November 2003 they, along with countless Massachusetts residents, looked forward to May 17 when marriages would begin, despite legal and political efforts to stop the first legal marriages from taking place. Thousands of people then advocated with legislators and policymakers over the next four years to defeat efforts to amend the state constitution, finally ensuring in June 2007 that the Goodridge ruling and the freedom to marry would remain the law in Massachusetts. 

The Goodridge plaintiffs advanced LGBTQ+ equality in Massachusetts and beyond, creating hope and inspiring activism nationwide. They helped to pave the way for additional marriage wins in states, the overturning of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in the U.S. Supreme Court, and, just twelve years later, the 2015 nationwide ruling for marriage equality at the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges.

“When the SJC decided Goodridge, it forever changed the standards for how LGBTQ+ people must be treated under law and raised the bar for equality across the country. This momentous victory would not have happened without the courage, commitment, and perseverance of the fourteen Goodridge plaintiffs,” said GLAD Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies Mary L. Bonauto, who was lead counsel in Goodridge and argued before the Supreme Court in Obergefell. “Their willingness to repeatedly open themselves to public scrutiny, to share the truth of their lives with their neighbors, and to face opposition from powerful leaders and institutions, ushered in legal and cultural shifts toward greater acceptance, protection, and integration of LGBTQ+ people and families in our communities. We remain grateful for the powerful and empowering efforts of the Goodridge plaintiffs in making marriage equality a reality in Massachusetts and beyond.”

“I wanted our kids to have the same safety and security in their family as other kids, and I believed that the constitution included us and that I could be part of making that movement toward our inclusion happen,” said Gina Nortonsmith of her and her spouse Heidi’s participation in the Goodridge case. “I’m proud that our sons live in a world where they know their parents stood up for the right of people to love whomever they love.”

“We felt incredibly honored to be able to represent one family’s journey in this cause, and to hear so many stories from people of how this decision touched their lives,” added Heidi Nortonsmith. “To be associated with love and equality—that’s a blessing for sure.”

Previous Spirit of Justice honorees include Nadine Smith, Kylar Broadus, Grace Sterling Stowell, Chai Feldblum, Jose Antonio Vargas, the Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr, Phill Wilson, Jennifer Finney Boylan, Urvashi Vaid, Margaret H. Marshall, Deval Patrick and his family; Reverend Irene Monroe; Bishop Gene Robinson; Beth Robinson, John Ward, Terrence McNally, Mandy Carter; Reverend William Sinkford, Tim Gill, Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon, Tony Kushner, Laurence Tribe, and Mary L. Bonauto.

Learn more about the Spirit of Justice Award Dinner on November 9, 2023.

Expanding Pharmacy Access to PrEP in Massachusetts

PrEP—a simple, safe medication that reduces the risk of HIV by close to 100%—is the most effective tool we have to end the HIV epidemic.

An Act Enabling Pharmacists to Prescribe, Dispense and Administer PrEP (S.2480/H.2225) expands access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by allowing pharmacists to provide a 60-day supply for those facing barriers to care. The bill also requires pharmacists to link customers who receive a limited supply of PrEP to primary care for ongoing medication and monitoring.

In Massachusetts, only about 1/3 of people at high risk of getting HIV currently have access to PrEP, and the racial disparities in access, particularly among Black and Latinx communities, are especially shocking. Nationally, just 13% of eligible Black people currently have access to this effective and potentially life-saving preventative.

By addressing disparities in access to critical HIV services and increasing access to the best tool available for preventing HIV transmission, S.2480/H.2225 significantly advances the Commonwealth’s goal of ending the HIV epidemic.

Sponsors: Senator Julian Cyr and Representative Jack Lewis

Learn more about PrEP

News

GLAD Praises Senate Passage of Bill to Make HIV-Prevention Pill Available at Pharmacies Without a Prescription

Urges House to act quickly to advance the Commonwealth’s goal of ending the HIV epidemic

Today, the Massachusetts Senate took a crucial step toward ending the HIV epidemic by passing “An Act enabling pharmacists to prescribe, dispense and administer PrEP” (S.2480).

“We’re grateful to Senator Cyr and Senate President Spilka for their unwavering commitment to removing barriers to PrEP access,” said Ben Klein, Senior Director of Litigation and HIV Law at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD). “S.2480 is life-saving legislation that opens a new avenue to obtaining PrEP quickly and easily for people who have difficulty accessing health care.”

Sponsored by Sen. Julian Cyr, S.2480 expands access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)—a simple, safe medication that reduces the risk of HIV by close to 100 percent yet remains underutilized—by permitting pharmacists to dispense a 60-day supply without a prescription. The bill also requires pharmacists to link customers who receive a limited supply of PrEP to primary care for ongoing medication and monitoring.

By addressing disparities in access to critical HIV services and increasing access to the best tool available for preventing HIV transmission, S.2480 significantly advances the Commonwealth’s goal of ending the HIV epidemic.

“PrEP is a game-changing tool for ending the HIV epidemic, but it remains extremely underutilized,” added Klein. “In Massachusetts, only about one-third of all those for whom PrEP is indicated are currently using it, and the racial disparities in access, particularly among Black and Latinx communities, are especially shocking. Nationally just 13 percent of eligible Black individuals currently have access to this effective and potentially life-saving preventative. We commend the Senate for today’s vote and look forward to working with Rep. Jack Lewis, sponsor of the House’s version of the bill (H.2225), on moving this legislation on to final passage.”

PrEP access is under attack nationally. S.2480 is one of two bills GLAD is advocating for to increase access to PrEP in Massachusetts. The second, An Act to address barriers to HIV prevention medication” (S.619/H.1085), also sponsored by Senator Cyr and Rep. Lewis, would remove insurance barriers that prevent people from receiving PrEP in a timely and consistent manner. S.619/H.1085 would eliminate onerous prior authorization requirements that delay access and can mean the difference between prevention or transmission of HIV.

“Copays, deductibles and pre-authorization requirements all decrease utilization of PrEP. That means more HIV cases, more significant HIV-related illness and even death, and ever-widening racial health disparities,” Klein said. “We must aggressively use every tool in our arsenal to reduce transmission and PrEP is the most potent tool we have. Access to PrEP is an essential public health measure and we’re grateful to legislative leaders including Senator Cyr and Rep. Lewis who are demonstrating their deep commitment to ending the HIV epidemic in Massachusetts.”

Learn more about the bill

Blog

Expanding GLAD Answers’ Reach Where We’re Needed Most

GLAD Answers, GLAD’s legal information line, is busy. This year so far, we have a monthly average of 169 intakes, up from 130 per month in 2022. GLAD Answers staff can answer questions and support a high number of callers with the help of 20 GLAD Answers volunteers.

Intakes per month so far this calendar year:

January

170

February

135

March

197

April

144

May

181

June

205

July

168

August

155

September

123

From January to September, callers have needed support in the following areas:

Issue areasNumber of intakes
ID Project271
Treatment In Prison193
Violence/Harassment122
Medical Care/Access86
Employment67
Housing57
Immigration/Asylum53
GLAD Answers Coordinator Kayden Hall and Public Information Manager Gabrielle Hamel

The team, GLAD Answers Coordinator Kayden Hall and Public Information Manager Gabrielle Hamel, holds a volunteer training every six months. We just held our latest training in September with six new volunteers joining fourteen dedicated others who have stayed with us from the previous year. These committed folks who donate their time respond to emails, phone calls, and online intakes, and provide resources and information to those in need.

Our next volunteer training will take place in the spring. You can sign up now!

With so many wonderful volunteers, we are working to expand our reach to ensure everyone who GLAD Answers can help is aware of this free resource, particularly low-income and Black and Brown communities, as well as regions outside greater Boston. We invite you to share information about GLAD Answers with those in your community who may have questions about their legal rights or need information about addressing anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination.

This story was originally published in the Fall 2023 GLAD Briefs Newsletter, Read more.

Virtual Training: Your Right To Learn

Across the country, there is a coordinated attempt to restrict what students can learn, teachers can teach, and libraries can lend. But it’s not just happening in other states – it’s happening here at home.

In Massachusetts, there were at least 45 attempts to restrict access to books last year, with 57 titles challenged. The vast majority of calls to ban books specifically aim to remove books that are by and about LGBTQ people, communities of color, and other marginalized groups. Massachusetts students have a right to learn in an environment where they feel valued and can think for themselves.

Join the ACLU and GLAD at our upcoming Advocates Academy training on Tuesday, October 17 at 6 pm. The training will be an opportunity to learn more about what’s happening in Massachusetts, what your rights are, and how to organize against attempts to restrict students’ right to learn.

en_USEnglish
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

To learn more, visit our privacy policy.