Rhode Island Know Your Rights - Page 4 of 16 - GLAD Law
Skip Header to Content
GLAD Logo Skip Primary Navigation to Content

Derechos de las personas transgénero | Atención médica | Rhode Island (Español)

Preguntas y respuestas sobre los derechos a la atención médica de las personas transgénero en Rhode Island

¿Los planes de salud pueden discriminar a las personas LGBTQ+?

De conformidad con la ley federal y del estado de Rhode Island, casi todos los planes de salud tienen prohibido discriminar por motivos de sexo y, dado que el fallo de la Corte Suprema en el caso Bostock v. Clayton Co. concluyó que toda discriminación por identidad de género u orientación sexual es una forma de discriminación por sexo, casi todos los planes de salud tienen prohibido discriminar a las personas LGBTQ+.

¿Qué protecciones para planes de salud establece Rhode Island?

Comisionado de Seguros Médicos de Rhode Island

En 2015, el Comisionado de Seguros Médicos de Rhode Island emitió un boletín “con el fin de informar a las aseguradoras de salud1, a los prestadores de atención médica y a los usuarios de seguros médicos que la discriminación contra una persona en el contexto de los seguros médicos debido a su identidad o expresión de género constituye discriminación sexual prohibida por la ley de Rhode Island. Esta prohibición se extiende a la disponibilidad de cobertura de los seguros médicos y a la prestación de beneficios de seguros médicos, incluida la cirugía transgénero necesaria desde el punto de vista médico y los servicios de atención médica relacionados con la identidad y la disforia de género”.

Medicaid de Rhode Island

En 2015, el programa Medicaid de Rhode Island eliminó la exclusión de la atención para la afirmación de género. Estas son las pautas para la atención médica para la disforia de género y las personas de género no binario: https://eohhs.ri.gov/sites/g/files/xkgbur226/files/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/MA-Providers/MA-Reference-Guides/Physician/gender_dysphoria.pdf.

¿Existen planes de salud que no estén protegidos por la ley de Rhode Island?

Sí. Medicare y los planes de salud de empleadores autofinanciados (también conocidos como “autoasegurados”) están regulados por la ley federal.

¿Qué protecciones para planes de salud establece el gobierno federal?

Medicare

En 2013, Medicare eliminó la prohibición de la cobertura del tratamiento de la disforia de género por ser “experimental” y comenzó a cubrir el tratamiento necesario desde el punto de vista médico para la disforia de género.

Artículo 1557 de la Ley de Atención Médica Asequible

El artículo 1557 de la Ley de Atención Médica Asequible (Affordable Care Act, ACA) establece que es ilegal que un profesional de atención médica que recibe fondos del gobierno federal se niegue a tratar a una persona, o discrimine de otra manera a una persona, por su sexo (así como por su raza, color de piel, nacionalidad, edad o discapacidad). El artículo 1557 impone requisitos similares para las aseguradoras de salud que reciben asistencia financiera federal. Los profesionales de atención médica y las aseguradoras tienen prohibido, entre otras cosas, excluir o tratar de forma adversa a una persona por cualquiera de estos motivos prohibidos. La disposición final del artículo 1557 se aplica a los beneficiarios de asistencia financiera del Departamento de Salud y Servicios Sociales (Department of Health and Human Services, HHS), los Mercados de Seguros Médicos y los programas de salud que administra el HHS.

Por lo general, el artículo 1557 no se aplica a planes de salud grupales autofinanciados de conformidad con la Ley de Seguridad de los Ingresos de los Jubilados (Employee Retirement Income Security Act, ERISA) o planes de duración limitada o a corto plazo porque las entidades que ofrecen los planes no suelen estar principalmente comprometidas con el negocio de brindar atención médica ni reciben asistencia financiera federal.

En mayo de 2021, la gestión de Biden anunció que la Oficina de Derechos Civiles (Office for Civil Rights, OCR) del HHS interpretaría que el artículo 1557 de la ACA y los requisitos de no discriminación del título IX basados en el sexo incluyen la orientación sexual y la identidad de género, y que haría respetar esto último. La actualización se implementó en el contexto de la decisión que tomó la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos en el caso Bostock v. Clayton County en junio de 2020 y las decisiones posteriores de la corte.

Al implementar el artículo 1557, la OCR respetará la Ley de Restablecimiento de la Libertad Religiosa (Religious Freedom Restoration Act), sección 2000bb y subsiguientes del título 42 del Código de los Estados Unidos (United States Code, USC), y todos los demás requisitos legales y órdenes del tribunal que se emitieron en litigios que involucraban las disposiciones del artículo 1557.

Título VII

El título VII les prohíbe a los empleadores que tienen 15 empleados o más discriminar por motivos de raza, color de piel, religión, sexo y nacionalidad en la contratación, el despido, el pago y otros términos, condiciones o privilegios del empleo. Los términos y las condiciones del empleo incluyen los beneficios de salud solventados por el empleador. Históricamente, no todas las autoridades han estado de acuerdo en que el título VII protege a los trabajadores LGBTQ+ de la discriminación.

Sin embargo, la decisión de la Corte Suprema en el caso Bostock v. Clayton Co. cambia esta situación porque la resolución dejó en claro que la discriminación por orientación sexual e identidad de género es una forma de discriminación por sexo. Aunque la decisión se relaciona con el despido indebido, tiene consecuencias en los planes de salud solventados por el empleador y otros beneficios. Por ejemplo, los empleadores podrían querer ajustar la cobertura de los planes de salud grupales para la disforia de género y los servicios relacionados, incluidas las cirugías de afirmación de género, y revisar y comparar los beneficios para cónyuges del mismo sexo y del sexo opuesto.

¿Los empleadores religiosos pueden discriminar a las personas LGBTQ+?

El 8 de julio de 2020, en el caso Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos reafirmó su posición en la implementación de la excepción ministerial en casos de discriminación en el empleo que se estableció en resoluciones anteriores. Esto implicó que, de forma simultánea, la Corte planteara una problemática sin resolver en virtud del título VII: ¿la excepción ministerial para empleadores religiosos les permite a esas organizaciones discriminar a los empleados o candidatos a puestos laborales por su condición de LGBTQ+?

En este punto, no queda claro de qué manera la resolución de la Corte en el caso Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru puede afectar a los empleados LGBTQ+ de empleadores religiosos, pero las organizaciones y los empleadores religiosos deberían reconocer que la excepción ministerial no se aplica a todos los puestos de sus organizaciones. Por el contrario, se limita solo a aquellos empleados que llevan a cabo obligaciones realmente religiosas. Por ejemplo, el puesto de un conserje escolar que solo está presente en el edificio fuera del horario escolar y no es responsable de transmitir la fe no se consideraría de naturaleza ministerial.

¿Qué pasos puedo seguir para obtener la cobertura del tratamiento de disforia de género?

1. Primero, verifique si su plan de salud cubre el tipo de tratamiento que desea; para ello, consiga una copia del “Resumen de beneficios y cobertura” del plan.

2. La mayoría de los planes de seguro, tanto públicos como privados, tienen requisitos detallados que se deben satisfacer para obtener la cobertura. Esto es así, en particular, si está intentando obtener cobertura para una cirugía relacionada con la transición. Por eso, comuníquese con su plan de salud y solicite una copia de los requisitos del tratamiento que desea.

3. Trabaje con sus terapeutas y médicos para asegurarse de que reúne todos los requisitos del plan de salud. Para determinar si su solicitud de tratamiento será aprobada, el factor más importante es la documentación proporcionada por sus terapeutas y médicos.

4. Verifique qué tratamientos requieren aprobación previa. En la mayoría de los casos, cualquier cirugía requiere aprobación previa y es posible que el plan solo pague si recurre a un cirujano que acepta el plan.

5. Si su solicitud de tratamiento es denegada, averigüe los motivos de la denegación y, si cree que de todos modos califica para el tratamiento, siga el proceso de apelación del plan. Por lo general, primero se llevará a cabo un proceso de apelación interno y, si no obtiene un resultado satisfactorio en esta instancia, en ocasiones, podrá apelar ante una agencia externa. Asegúrese de respetar los plazos, ya que, si no lo hace, podría perder la posibilidad de apelar.

6. Informe a GLAD si le deniegan un tratamiento. GLAD podría hacerle sugerencias que lo ayuden a ganar la apelación. Puede comunicarse con GLAD Answers en GLAD Answers o por teléfono llamando al 800-455-GLAD (4523).

7. Aunque ahora más planes de salud cubren el tratamiento de la disforia de género, el proceso para obtener el tratamiento, en particular, para obtener la cirugía relacionada con la transición, puede llevar tiempo y causarle frustraciones. Se necesita mucha documentación y puede ser difícil encontrar un cirujano que realice este tipo de cirugía y que sea aceptable para el plan de salud.

8. No tenga miedo de ser persistente y de volver a presentar una solicitud si recibe una respuesta negativa.

¿Cómo encuentro un cirujano que acepte mi seguro de salud?

Cada vez más cirujanos que realizan cirugías de reasignación de sexo aceptan seguros médicos. Busque cirujanos de forma minuciosa para encontrar el adecuado para usted. Puede consultar la lista de profesionales de la red de su plan para saber si forman parte de ella o si la lista incluye cirujanos en su área. Otra opción consiste en comunicarse con el consultorio del cirujano para preguntar si aceptan su seguro. La mayoría de los planes de seguro médico exigen que recurra a un profesional médico de su red; sin embargo, si su red no incluye un cirujano que preste los servicios que usted necesita, es posible que pueda recurrir a alguien fuera de la red si solicita la autorización previa del plan.

¿Qué debería hacer si el sector sanitario me discrimina?

Si está siendo discriminado por un centro o un prestador de atención médica, puede presentar una queja por discriminación ante la Comisión de Derechos Humanos de Rhode Island. Consulte el Área de problemas de “discriminación” para obtener información detallada sobre cómo hacerlo.

Si tiene un plan de salud regulado por la Oficina del Comisionado de Seguros Médicos, puede presentar una queja ante esa agencia: https://ohic.ri.gov/consumer-protection/file-complaint

Si tiene un plan de salud regulado por el artículo 1557 de la ACA, puede presentar una queja ante la Oficina de Derechos Civiles del Departamento federal de Salud y Servicios Sociales. Para obtener más información, consulte: https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/filing-a-complaint/complaint-process/index.html. Si tiene un plan de salud autofinanciado a través de su empleador que tiene como mínimo 15 empleados, puede presentar una queja por discriminación ante la Comisión federal de Igualdad en las Oportunidades de Empleo (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC). Para obtener más información, consulte el Área de problemas de “discriminación”.

Justicia penal | Hostigamiento policial | Rhode Island (Español)

Preguntas y respuestas sobre el hostigamiento policial en Rhode Island

Con frecuencia, la policía me pide que “me retire” de áreas públicas. ¿Es legal?

No necesariamente. Si el área es pública y no hay carteles en los que se indique que hay horarios específicos, por lo general, tiene derecho a permanecer allí siempre y cuando no realice actividades ilegales. Los lugares públicos son de todos y, además, suelen ser lugares de acogida al público sujetos a la ley contra la discriminación de Connecticut. Incluso si un oficial de policía quiere impedir un delito, o tiene sospechas de algún tipo de intención ilegal, no tiene derecho general a pedirles a las personas que se desplacen de un lugar a otro, a menos que se esté llevando a cabo una conducta ilegal.

¿Cuáles son las reglas generales sobre la interacción con la policía?

La presencia de personas que parecen ser LGBTQ+, ya sea porque exhiben símbolos como banderas con los colores del arcoíris, un triángulo rosa o por otra razón, no debe desencadenar ningún escrutinio especial por parte de un oficial de policía.

Claro que la policía puede acercarse a una persona y hacerle preguntas, pero el hecho de que una persona haya sido condenada por un delito anterior, se niegue a responder o responda de una manera que no satisface al oficial no podrá justificar su arresto sin más.

Si un oficial tiene “sospechas razonables y articulables” de que se ha cometido un delito o de que está por cometerse, podrá arrestar brevemente a la persona o detenerla con fines de investigación. Sin embargo, una detención solo se puede realizar si existen “fundamentos probables” de que se ha cometido un delito.

¿Qué puedo hacer si creo que la policía me trató de forma inapropiada?

Se pueden presentar quejas ante cualquier departamento de policía particular por asuntos relativos a sus oficiales. Muchos departamentos tienen sus propias Divisiones de Asuntos Internos que reciben e investigan quejas de civiles contra oficiales de la policía.

Las quejas sobre la policía estatal de Rhode Island se deben realizar en la Oficina de Estándares Profesionales de la policía estatal de Rhode Island, con la cual se puede comunicar por escrito a 311 Danielson Pike, North Scituate, RI 02857 o por teléfono al (401) 444-1011. Los formularios para quejas de ciudadanos también están disponibles en el sitio web de la policía estatal, Formulario de quejas o elogios para la policía estatal de Rhode Island.

Las quejas deben incluir la mayor cantidad de información posible sobre el incidente, incluido su nombre e información de contacto; el nombre, el rango y el número de placa (si lo sabe) del oficial; el lugar, la fecha, la hora y los detalles del incidente; así como los nombres y la información de contacto de los testigos. Informe a GLAD siempre que presente una queja para que podamos hacer un seguimiento de la capacidad de respuesta de varios departamentos de policía.

En algunos casos, una persona puede decidir iniciar una demanda por lesiones, detención inadecuada u otro motivo. Estos asuntos son muy especializados y GLAD puede derivarlo a un abogado.

Las personas también pueden intentar pedir ayuda a la División Penal de la Fiscalía General llamando al (401) 274-4400.

News

Rhode Island Boosts Security for LGBTQ+ Families with Confirmatory Adoption Law

Rhode Island continues to be a leader in supporting and protecting LGBTQ+ people and families with the passage of a new law that makes it easier for parents who have had a child through assisted reproduction to confirm their parentage through adoption. 

Governor Dan McKee signed “An Act Relating To Domestic Relations — Adoption Of Children” (2023-H 5226A, 2023-S 0121A) into law June 19. Championed by Senator Dawn Euer and Representative Rebecca Kislak, the legislation removes cumbersome and costly barriers that non-biological parents face when adopting their own children, making it easier for them to secure an adoption decree to reflect their parentage. This gives families greater protection when they travel or move to places outside of Rhode Island—especially to areas that are less LGBTQ-friendly.

“This is a significant additional step toward ensuring LGBTQ+ families in Rhode Island are treated fairly and equally, and that their family ties are recognized and protected no matter the circumstances and no matter where they travel. We’re grateful for the leadership of Sen. Euer and Rep. Kislak in shepherding this bill to the governor’s desk,” said Polly Crozier, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders Director of Family Advocacy. “With extremists escalating their attacks on LGBTQ+ people across the country, parents are rightfully worried about the safety of their children. An adoption decree provides additional security for these families.”

Rhode Island parents who experienced the process of adopting their children born through assisted reproduction—including Rep. Kislak, who is an LGBTQ+ legislator, and her spouse—said it is needlessly long, convoluted, expensive and invasive, subjecting parents to a six-month waiting period, multiple court dates, home inspections, financial assessments, and other requirements.

Under the new law, parents of children born through assisted reproduction whose parentage has already been established through the Uniform Parentage Act need only submit to the court a petition signed by both parties that includes the child’s birth certificate, a marriage certificate if applicable, and a signed declaration by both parents explaining the circumstances of the child’s birth through assisted reproduction, attesting to their consent to assisted reproduction, and attesting that there are no competing claims of parentage.

The court will then grant the adoption within 30 days of finding that either the parent who gave birth and the spouse were married at the time of the child’s birth and the child was born through assisted reproduction; or, for nonmarital parents, that the person who gave birth and the non-marital parent consented to the assisted reproduction; and that no competing parental claims exist.

These changes to the adoption process apply only to children born through assisted reproduction whose parents seek adoption for confirmation of parentage that has already been legally established under the provisions of the Uniform Parentage Act.

“This law is one additional step we need to take to fully protect families. It will make the process much easier, and give them peace of mind when they travel to another state where their rights aren’t as secure,” said Rep. Kislak. “It shouldn’t be an arduous process for people to adopt their own children, whom they have loved and parented since birth. This law will eliminate obstacles so all kinds of families will have access to the legal protections they deserve.”

“It shouldn’t take years, thousands of dollars, humiliating inspections and many court dates to get an adoption decree that merely confirms an already legally recognized, loving family,” said Sen. Euer. “We are so happy to make this process far easier, so families can access the protection they need.”

“An Act Relating To Domestic Relations — Adoption Of Children” builds upon the important protections established for LGBTQ+ Ocean State families with the passage of the Rhode Island Uniform Parentage Act in 2020, which updated the state’s long outdated parentage laws to be inclusive of LGBTQ+ families.

2023 Pride Events

About the Events

It’s Pride season and we can’t wait to celebrate at Pride events across New England! If you will be attending any of the events below, we hope you will stop by our GLAD table to say hello, check out some resources, and grab some free GLAD swag.


And don’t miss us this fall at Hartford Pride on September 9 and Worcester Pride on September 10!

News

As threats to LGBTQ+ people escalate across the country, the Senate today unanimously voted to pass a bill to make confirmatory adoption more accessible for LGBTQ+ families

Today the Rhode Island Senate voted unanimously to pass S 0121, a bill that will streamline the process for confirmatory adoption and make it more accessible for LGBTQ+ parents to ensure security for their families through adoption. A companion bill, H 5226, is under consideration in the House.

As LGBTQ+ families are under attack around the country today the Rhode Island Senate affirmed once again that love makes a family,” said lead sponsor Senator Dawn Euer. “I’m grateful to my Senate colleagues for unanimously supporting the confirmatory adoption legislation on the floor today.

“Today’s unanimous Senate vote is an incredible demonstration of Rhode Island’s commitment to protecting children and families and ensuring equality for LGBTQ+ people. I’m grateful to Senator Euer for her leadership and to each of the Senators who understood the urgency and importance of advancing this bill,” said Polly Crozier, Director of Family Advocacy at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. “With extremists escalating their attacks on LGBTQ+ people across the country, parents are more worried than ever about the safety of their children. An adoption decree provides additional security for children, particularly if families travel or move outside Rhode Island. S 0121 will remove needless barriers to adoption for LGBTQ+ people who seek to confirm their parentage.”

While Rhode Island is a leader in protections for LGBTQ+ families and has clear paths to establish legal parentage under the Uniform Parentage Act, passed in 2020, confirmatory adoption is an important next step – particularly given the startling increase in attacks nationwide on LGBTQ+ people. Many Rhode Islanders seek an adoption decree as additional security – it is a court judgment that ensures recognition of parentage in all states. S 0121 ensures that LGBTQ+ parents – who are already legal parents under Rhode Island law – can easily access an adoption decree to provide that additional security for their children to protect them from bias and discrimination across the country.

S 0121 was introduced by Senators Euer, Murray, Mack, Pearson, Kallman, LaMountain, Lauria, McKenney, Acosta, and Miller.

H 5226 was introduced by Representatives Kislak, Shekarchi, McEntee, Kazarian, Edwards, Craven, Caldwell, Vella-Wilkinson, Batista, and Ajello.

Learn more: Fact sheet

News

RI Senate Advances Bill to Make Confirmatory Adoption More Accessible for LGBTQ+ Families

As threats to LGBTQ+ people escalate across the country, the Senate Judiciary Committee has advanced a bill to provide vital protections for families in Rhode Island

Today the Rhode Island Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to recommend S 0121, a bill that will streamline the process for confirmatory adoption and make it more accessible for LGBTQ+ parents to ensure security for their families through adoption. The bill will now advance to a floor vote in the Senate, where it is expected to pass. A companion bill, H 5226, is under consideration in the House Judiciary Committee.

While Rhode Island is a leader in protections for LGBTQ+ families and has clear paths to establish legal parentage under the Uniform Parentage Act, passed in 2020, confirmatory adoption is an important next step  – particularly given the startling increase in attacks nationwide on LGBTQ+ people.  Many Rhode Islanders seek an adoption decree as additional security — it is a court judgment that ensures recognition of parentage in all states. S 0121 ensures that LGBTQ+ parents – who are already legal parents under Rhode Island law – can easily access an adoption decree to provide that additional security for their children to protect them from bias and discrimination across the country.

“Given the current climate of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation across the country, it is more important than ever for LGBTQ+ families to have access to the legal protections they want and need for their families,” said lead sponsor Senator Dawn Euer. “I’m grateful that my colleagues on the Judiciary Committee were motivated to move quickly to advance this priority bill, which will make it accessible for more Rhode Island parents to secure a confirmatory adoption. Rhode Island is an inclusive state that cares about equality and security for our LGBTQ+ community – including their children — and today’s action on S 0121 is proof of that. I look forward to the vote on the Senate floor.”

Threats to marriage equality raised in last June’s U.S. Supreme Court Dobbs ruling combined with escalating anti-LGBTQ+ bills and state court rulings around the country have increased the urgency of updating Rhode Island’s confirmatory adoption process to ensure LGBTQ+ families have access to all options for securing their child-parent relationships. Recent court rulings in states including Oklahoma, Michigan, Texas, and Pennsylvania have in fact separated children from non-birth parents using justifications including outdated, gendered laws, or a lack of application of the marital presumption.

“I’m thankful to Senator Euer and to the members of the Judiciary Committee for seeing the urgency and importance of advancing this bill to protect children and families,” said Polly Crozier, Director of Family Advocacy at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. “With extremists escalating their attacks on LGBTQ+ people across the country, parents are more worried than ever about the safety of their children. An adoption decree provides additional security for children, particularly if families travel or move outside Rhode Island. S 0121 will remove needless barriers to adoption for LGBTQ+ people who seek to confirm their parentage.”

For parents seeking an adoption to confirm, rather than to establish, their parentage, S 0121 eliminates unnecessary requirements that aren’t appropriate for people who are already parents to their children and provides a streamlined path for such parents to petition a court for an adoption decree. Under current law, LGBTQ+ parents who wish to confirm parentage through adoption are forced to go through burdensome and unnecessary steps to adopt their own children, which can include an invasive home study or investigation, a minimum period of residency in the home, an in-person court hearing, and more. This leaves children and families vulnerable because these additional steps can delay the adoption process or make such an adoption entirely out-of-reach for some families because of cost.

Parents and advocates submitted testimony in support of the Senate and House bills, including:

Beth Cronin, MD, Parent and Obstetrician/Gynecologist at a community health center:

“The 2022 Dobbs ruling has created real fear across the LGBTQ+ community for many reasons, but one of them is the security of our marriages and our families. Having access to adoption to secure our families is important when traveling throughout the country. Having to endure an invasive home study with a social worker interviewing us to determine if I am fit to parent these two children we have planned for, wished for, are now parenting, is offensive, disheartening, and unjust. To be forced to alert the sperm donor, who willingly and anonymously donated…without any intentions or expectations of parenting the child, via a newspaper posting that the adoption is planned, and then jump through additional hoops of court hearings will not only add cost, but will cost us emotional energy…This adoption process is expensive and most members of the LGBTQ+ community are spending several thousand dollars on legal fees. This is a cruel process and can be made much more humane and efficient if we enact this new legislation.”

Jordan Budd, Executive Director of COLAGE, a support and advocacy group for children of LGBTQ+ parents:
“All children, no matter who their parents happen to be, deserve to feel safe and secure in their families. People with LGBTQ+ parents are especially vulnerable right now with attacks on LGBTQ+ people and families making news across the country each and every day. Rhode Island LGBTQ+ families should not have to worry about crossing state lines for fear of their legal relationships coming into question.”

Kate Weldon LeBlanc, Executive Director of Resolve New England:
“S 0121 would eliminate unnecessary requirements and provide a streamlined path to petition a court for an adoption decree. It is unfair that non-birthing parents currently have to adopt their own children through a complicated, lengthy, and expensive process. Also, the delay in confirming parentage leaves the children vulnerable.”

Courtney G. Joslin, parentage law expert and U.C. Davis Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law
“[E]ven if families are protected as a matter of Rhode Island law, they may experience discrimination as they travel about the country. Parties, including state officials, may argue and in some cases have argued that another state should not recognize a parent-child relationship involving a Rhode Island resident even where that relationship is recognized and protected as a matter of Rhode Island law.”

Shelbi D. Day, Chief Policy Officer of Family Equality:
“Currently, under Rhode Island law, parents must go through the traditional adoption process to obtain a court order confirming their legal relationship to their child even where Rhode Island law already recognizes them as parents. Doing so can be unduly burdensome, create economic hardship, and cause delay as it requires an invasive home study or investigation, a minimum period of residency in the home, and an in-person court hearing.”

S 0121 was introduced by Senators Euer, Murray, Mack, Pearson, Kallman, LaMountain, Lauria, McKenney, Acosta, and Miller.

H 5226 was introduced by Representatives Kislak, Shekarchi, McEntee, Kazarian, Edwards, Craven, Caldwell, Vella-Wilkinson, Batista, and Ajello.

Learn more: Fact sheet

News

GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders will present the Justice for All award to Representative Cicilline on June 15, 2023

GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders will honor Congressman David Cicilline at the organization’s Rhode Island Event on June 15, in recognition of his substantial and sustained advocacy for LGBTQ equality and human rights throughout his career in government. Congressman Cicilline has represented Rhode Island’s 1st Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives since 2011 and has been a steadfast advocate for the rights of LGBTQ people and for reproductive freedom, racial justice, voting rights and election integrity. He announced earlier this year that he will leave Congress this summer to lead the Rhode Island Foundation.

“Congressman David Cicilline has been a resolute champion of human rights and LGBTQ+ equality during his twelve years in the U.S. House and throughout his nearly two decades of public service in Rhode Island before that,” said Janson Wu, Executive Director of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. “His leadership on the Equality Act was vital to building record bipartisan support for federal LGBTQ+ nondiscrimination protections in the House. Representative Cicilline’s trailblazing accomplishments – from becoming the first openly gay mayor of a major U.S. city to his pivotal work in the Congressional Equality Caucus – alongside his integrity and dedication to civil rights and democratic ideals – have made him a role model for generations of young LGBTQ+ leaders. We are thrilled to honor him with the Justice for All award for his steadfast and inspiring work for equality.”

Congressman David Cicilline

“Looking back on my tenure in Congress, I’m so proud of the progress we’ve made toward LGBTQI+ equality,” said Congressman Cicilline. “Over the last 12 years, we protected marriage equality with the Respect for Marriage Act, twice passed the Equality Act in the House, and designated the National Pulse Memorial. We convened the first meeting between a sitting U.S. President, Joe Biden, and the Equality Caucus, and increased support for key programs at home and abroad that are protecting LGBTQI+ rights. We now have a historic number of LGBTQI+ Members serving in Congress and have seen barriers broken in state legislatures across the country. These new leaders give me hope for the future – a future with equality for all, no matter who you are or who you love. I thank GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders for their partnership and advocacy and am honored to receive the Justice for All award.”

Congressman Cicilline was the lead sponsor of the Equality Act, legislation that would provide explicit federal nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people. Under his leadership the bill passed the House with strong bipartisan support in 2019 and 2021. Representative Cicilline has served as a leader in the Congressional Equality Caucus and has co-sponsored multiple bills seeking to advance LGBTQ+ rights, including the Every Child Deserves a Family Act, the Student Non-Discrimination Act, the LGBT Data Inclusion Act, and the Global Respect Act. Following former President Trump’s announcement of a ban on military service of transgender Americans in 2017, Congressman Cicilline quickly voiced opposition to the policy and introduced the Restore Honor to Service Members Act, which aimed to reverse the ban. This past year, Representative Cicilline was a co-sponsor of the historic Respect for Marriage Act (RMA) which was signed by President Biden in December 2022.

Prior to being elected to Congress, David Cicilline served for eight years in the Rhode Island House of Representatives, during which he was instrumental in passing an LGBTQ+-inclusive state hate crimes law in 2001. He made history as the first openly gay mayor of a major U.S. city when he was elected mayor of Providence, where he served from 2003 – 2011. As mayor, Cicilline launched a Safe Schools initiative to support LGBTQ+ students in the city. He was active in efforts to add protections for transgender people to Rhode Island’s state nondiscrimination law in 2011, and in the passage of marriage equality legislation in 2013.

Congressman Cicilline will receive the Justice for All award from GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders June 15 in Providence, Rhode Island. Get tickets and details about the event.

Get Tickets button

News

Rhode Island Must Take Another Step to Protect LGBTQ Families by Making Confirmatory Adoption More Accessible

As threats to LGBTQ+ people escalate across the country, Rhode Island legislators are considering a bill to provide vital protections for families            

March 31, 2023 (PROVIDENCE) — Yesterday the Rhode Island Senate Judiciary Committee heard testimony in support of S 0121, a bill that will streamline the process for confirmatory adoption and make it more accessible for LGBTQ+ parents to ensure security for their families through adoption. A companion bill, H 5226, was heard in the House Judiciary Committee earlier this month.

While Rhode Island has clear paths for LGBTQ+ parents to establish legal parentage under the Uniform Parentage Act, passed in 2020, confirmatory adoption is important for LGBTQ+ families and other families who want to confirm their parentage through an adoption decree. An adoption decree is a court judgment that ensures recognition of parentage in all states.

Threats to marriage equality raised in last June’s U.S. Supreme Court Dobbs ruling combined with escalating anti-LGBTQ+ bills and state court rulings around the country have increased the urgency of updating Rhode Island’s confirmatory adoption process to ensure LGBTQ+ families have access to all options for securing their child-parent relationships.

“Language in the Dobbs ruling inviting efforts to overturn marriage equality sparked fear for LGBTQ+ families last June. Since then, we have seen nearly 500 anti-LGBTQ+ bills introduced in states across the country. S 0121 is an opportunity for Rhode Island to show we are an inclusive state that cares about equality and security for our LGBTQ+ community and families.” said Senate lead sponsor Senator Dawn Euer. “Passing this bill will make it accessible for more Rhode Island parents to secure a confirmatory adoption. It is more important than ever for LGBTQ+ families to have access to the legal protections they want and need for their families.”

For parents seeking an adoption to confirm, rather than to establish, their parentage, S 0121 eliminates unnecessary requirements that aren’t appropriate for people who are already parents to their children and provides a streamlined path for such parents to petition a court for an adoption decree. Under current law, LGBTQ+ parents who wish to confirm parentage through adoption are forced to go through burdensome and unnecessary steps to adopt their own children, which can include an invasive home study or investigation, a minimum period of residency in the home, an in-person court hearing, and more. This leaves children and families vulnerable because these additional steps can delay the adoption process or make such an adoption entirely out-of-reach for some families because of cost. 

Language in the Supreme Court Dobbs ruling last June suggesting that the Court should reconsider the Obergefell marriage equality ruling in the future has created real fear for LGBTQ+ people that their marriages and families could be at risk. Recent court rulings in states including Oklahoma, Michigan, Texas, and Pennsylvania have in fact separated children from non-birth parents using justifications including outdated, gendered laws, or a lack of application of the marital presumption. An adoption decree provides security for children.

“Rhode Island has been a leader on transgender, gay, lesbian, and bisexual equality for decades and led on protections for LGBTQ+ families with the 2020 Uniform Parentage Act. Now, with escalating extremist attacks on LGBTQ+ people happening across the country, the state can lead again, said Polly Crozier, Director of Family Advocacy at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. “Parents are more worried than ever about the safety of their children. S 0121 is one urgent and important way for Rhode Island to signal support for LGBTQ+ people, by removing barriers to adoption for LGBTQ+ people who seek to confirm their parentage and secure their children through an adoption decree wherever they travel or move outside Rhode Island.”

“I’m so proud of the work we did in 2020 to pass the Rhode Island Uniform Parentage Act which created paths for LGBTQ+ parents to secure their legal ties to their children under Rhode Island law,“ said lead sponsor of the House bill, Representative Rebecca Kislak. “I’m hearing from terrified Rhode Island parents who are looking at what is happening around the country with anti-LGBTQ+ legislation targeting young people and court rulings ripping children away from parents who planned for, raised, and love them. Now we need to take this next step to make sure every parent and child can have the security of adoption so they can feel secure if they happen to move or even just visit family in states like Florida or Oklahoma that don’t have the protections we have here.”

Parents and advocates submitted testimony in support of the Senate and House bills, including:

Beth Cronin, MD, Parent and Obstetrician/Gynecologist at a community health center:

“The 2022 Dobbs ruling has created real fear across the LGBTQ+ community for many reasons, but one of them is the security of our marriages and our families. Having access to adoption to secure our families is important when traveling throughout the country. Having to endure an invasive home study with a social worker interviewing us to determine if I am fit to parent these two children we have planned for, wished for, are now parenting, is offensive, disheartening, and unjust. To be forced to alert the sperm donor, who willingly and anonymously donated…without any intentions or expectations of parenting the child, via a newspaper posting that the adoption is planned, and then jump through additional hoops of court hearings will not only add cost, but will cost us emotional energy…This adoption process is expensive and most members of the LGBTQ+ community are spending several thousand dollars on legal fees. This is a cruel process and can be made much more humane and efficient if we enact this new legislation.”

Jordan Budd, Executive Director of COLAGE, a support and advocacy group for children of LGBTQ+ parents:
“All children, no matter who their parents happen to be, deserve to feel safe and secure in their families. People with LGBTQ+ parents are especially vulnerable right now with attacks on LGBTQ+ people and families making news across the country each and every day. Rhode Island LGBTQ+ families should not have to worry about crossing state lines for fear of their legal relationships coming into question.”

Kate Weldon LeBlanc, Executive Director of Resolve New England:
“S 0121 would eliminate unnecessary requirements and provide a streamlined path to petition a court for an adoption decree. It is unfair that non-birthing parents currently have to adopt their own children through a complicated, lengthy and expensive process. Also, the delay in confirming parentage leaves the children vulnerable.”

Courtney G. Joslin, parentage law expert and U.C. Davis Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law
“[E]ven if families are protected as a matter of Rhode Island law, they may experience discrimination as they travel about the country. Parties, including state officials, may argue and in some cases have argued that another state should not recognize a parent-child relationship involving a Rhode Island resident even where that relationship is recognized and protected as a matter of Rhode Island law.”

Shelbi D. Day, Chief Policy Officer of Family Equality:
“Currently, under Rhode Island law, parents must go through the traditional adoption process to obtain a court order confirming their legal relationship to their child even where Rhode Island law already recognizes them as parents. Doing so can be unduly burdensome, create economic hardship, and cause delay as it requires an invasive home study or investigation, a minimum period of residency in the home, and an in-person court hearing.”

S 0121 was introduced by Senators Euer, Murray, Mack, Pearson, Kallman, LaMountain, Lauria, McKenney, Acosta, and Miller.

H 5226 was introduced by Representatives Kislak, Shekarchi, McEntee, Kazarian, Edwards, Craven, Caldwell, Vella-Wilkinson, Batista, and Ajello.

A fact sheet with further information on the bill is available at www.gladlaw.org

News

In an open letter shared with State House leadership today, Rhode Island LGBTQ+ advocates and supporters urged legislators to reject several proposals that will introduce harmful discrimination into state law, particularly directed at LGBTQ+ youth and youth of color. Three of those proposals, H 5859, H 5688, and H 5739, will have hearings this afternoon in the House Committee on Education.

The full letter from advocates follows below:

An Open Letter to Rhode Island State House Leadership:

There is a sweeping campaign of attacks across the country targeting LGBTQ people and especially transgender and non-binary young people. Now, a few Rhode Island legislators are attempting to bring these harmful and discriminatory bills to our State House. We represent a coalition of local organizations and advocates joining together to condemn these attacks and affirm our commitment to protecting the well-being of LGBTQ people and their loved ones in Rhode Island.

We call on Rhode Island’s legislators to reject shameful measures, including H 5859, 5688, H 5499, H 5756, H 5739, S 0179, S 0186, S 0352, S 0391, S 0414, and S 0487 which seek to limit our rights and freedoms.

The bills introduced in Rhode Island focus largely on schools and young people, a strategy played out in other states to create moral panic under the banner of ‘protect the children’.  We’ve already seen real-world examples of how bills like these are hurting young people in states like Florida and New Hampshire. They are causing teachers to stop addressing anti-LGBTQ and racist bullying out of fear, erasing LGBTQ+ students and families from the classroom, and banishing books that can provide important stories for students as they figure out who they are.

We should all be able to agree that a strong partnership between Rhode Island parents, schools, and youth is important to ensuring all students can learn in a safe, supportive and welcoming environment. Research shows that an inclusive and welcoming environment creates better educational outcomes for all students. Rhode Island has long been a leader in supporting all students through its inclusive practices. The evidence is in. We know that we can successfully support our transgender and non-transgender students under existing law.

We know that the bills being introduced in Rhode Island are modeled on legislation being pushed in other states by organized groups dedicated to discriminating against transgender and LGBQ people, and imposing their singular vision for public life across the country. We know that these outside actors, including some designated as extremist or hate groups, are not motivated by the best interests of Rhode Islanders. We know that these outside actors are not motivated by our state’s long history of protecting the humanity and equality of LGBTQ people. The legislators introducing these proposals in Rhode Island, knowingly or not, have bought into the false stories that seek to demonize the LGBTQ community, disrupt our schools, and distract our government’s attention with these non-issues.

Most alarmingly, the groups pushing these harmful bills across the country are continually raising the stakes. This month, we have seen the evidence that their ‘protect the children’ crusade is only the starting point. They recognize that it is the easiest path to rally support for measures that will roll back rights we all currently enjoy. Some of these actors have gone so far as saying their ultimate goal is the complete erasure of transgender people from public life.

It can be hard to understand what it is like to be an LGBTQ person. But, we long ago agreed as a state that LGBTQ people should be treated with the same dignity and respect as everyone else. We urge our legislators to reaffirm Rhode Island’s values, reject these dangerous proposals, and ensure that our state motto of Hope continues to apply to everyone.

The letter was signed by over 180 Rhode Island individuals and the following community organizations:

Thundermist Health Center
ACLU of Rhode Island
Youth Pride, Inc.
TGI Network of RI
Haus of Codec
Sojourner House
Pride in Aging
Rhode Island Queer PAC
Gender and Sexuality Center, University of Rhode Island
Project Weber/RENEW
LGBTQ Action RI
Newport Pride
COYOTE RI
SHIP
The Womxn Project
Women’s Resource Center
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders
American Academy of Pediatrics, Rhode Island Chapter
RI Council of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Rhode Island Academy of Family Physicians
Rhode Island Public Health Institute
Open Door Health
Planned Parenthood of Southern New England
Community Care Alliance
East Greenwich Pediatrics
Washington County Health Equity Zone
Rhode Island Student Assistance Services
Washington County Coalition for Children
Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights
Rhode Island Democratic Women’s Caucus
Rhode Island Center for Justice
Rhode Island NOW
Rhode Island Atheists
Ryder | Talbutt Group
Radically Thrive Therapy
Newport Partnership for Families
Little Maven Lemonade
FabNewport, Inc.
FABx

Read the letter and full list of signers.

Check out the fact sheet to learn more.

Improving Access to PrEP in Rhode Island

Rhode Island’s H6150 will expand access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) – a game-changing medication that reduces the risk of HIV transmission by close to 100 percent.

H6150 lets pharmacists provide a patient with a short-term supply (60 days once in a two-year period) of PrEP without a prescription. Pharmacists will be required to provide counseling on the use of PrEP and connect patients without a primary care provider with health care providers for ongoing medication and care.

H6150 also requires insurers to cover one type of PrEP within each method of administration without cost-sharing or prior authorization. These provisions are critical but should go further to remove obstacles to PrEP.

en_USEnglish
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

To learn more, visit our privacy policy.