Raftopol v. Ramey
Status: Victory
In a first-of-its kind decision, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled on Jan. 5, 2011 that a gay male couple who wanted to have children and used a gestational surrogate are the children’s legal parents, and that the state must permit both men’s names to be placed on the birth certificates.
GLAD filed an amicus brief to the Connecticut Supreme Court in this case concerning the legal status of non-genetic parents of children born through gestational surrogacy. The brief, filed on behalf of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the American Academy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys, Connecticut Fertility Associates and New England Fertility Institute, argues that the Superior Court can and should confirm the legal relationships between these children and both of their intended parents by issuing pre-birth orders of parentage and by directing the Department of Public Health to issue birth certificates that reflect the joint parentage of these children.
GLAD was joined in this brief by Ken Bartschi and Karen Dowd of Horton, Shields and Knox, Tom Ude of Lambda Legal, and John Weltman and Scott Buckley of the Weltman Law Group. The Raftopols are represented by Victoria Ferrara of Fairfield, CT.
Related Content
-
Advocates Commend Advance in Fertility Care Coverage for Connecticut Families
May 7, 2026Read MoreWe celebrate the passage of a bill that requires private insurers to cover fertility health care for LGBTQ+ couples and single individuals.
-
Fertility Care Regulation in Connecticut
Read MoreUpdate: SB293 died in the House in May 2026. Since the ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health…
-
Expanding Medicaid Fertility Coverage in Connecticut
Read MoreUpdate: HB5483 died in committee in May 2026. Connecticut does not currently provide adequate coverage for fertility health…

