Connecticut Children’s Betrays Families Once Again with DOJ Settlement
On August 5 the Department of Justice announced a settlement with Connecticut Children’s Medical Center (CCMC) in which CCMC agreed it will not provide well-established medical care for transgender youth.
DOJ acknowledges in its announcement that the settlement is based solely on allegations it has made against CCMC, which CCMC denies, and that there has been no determination of liability or that CCMC has violated federal law.
GLAD Law Staff Attorney Hannah Hussey, who represents Connecticut families in a pending legal challenge against CCMC for abruptly terminating medical care for transgender adolescents and young adults in the summer of 2025, issued the following statement:
“Connecticut Children’s Medical Center has once again betrayed Connecticut families. Last July CCMC told parents with no warning that their trusted doctors would no longer provide the care they know stops their children’s suffering and allows them to thrive. By agreeing to this settlement, the hospital has doubled-down not only on that breach of faith with parents and patients, but on its attempt to thwart its obligation under Connecticut law to provide medical care without discrimination. As CCMC itself maintains, it did not violate federal law. In fact, there is no federal law against providing medical care for transgender adolescents according to the rigorous standards of care. The Trump administration is using unprecedented threats to go after established medical care for the small population of transgender adolescents. These tactics should chill every American who believes that health care decisions should be made by parents, patients, and doctors who understand the care, not by a federal government with a political agenda.”
Connecticut law prohibits discrimination against transgender people, including in health care. GLAD Law and Attorney Kevin Barry of Quinnipiac University School of Law represent ten Connecticut individuals and families challenging the sudden termination of medical care for transgender adolescents and young adults last July by both Connecticut Children’s Medical Center (CCMC) and Yale New Haven Health (YNHH). That legal challenge is currently pending in the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities.
Love, care, and commitment are what make a family, but the law protects it. Even as organizations that have long opposed equality recycle old, debunked arguments to restrict marriage rights, parentage protections, and access to fertility care for LGBTQ+ people and others based on one narrow definition of family, we’re making tremendous progress toward ensuring that everyone is free to start a family on their own terms and have secure legal parent-child relationships regardless of biological connection.
In recent months, GLAD Law helped secure passage of a law in Connecticut to ensure more equitable treatment for all families in that state. Connecticut removed a big barrier to family building for many people with HB 5374, which requires private insurers to cover fertility health care for LGBTQ+ couples and single individuals and aligns Connecticut’s private insurance with the current standard-of-care definition of infertility for coverage.
These victories highlight GLAD Law’s ongoing work to protect children, to secure comprehensive paths to family recognition and security for the diverse array of American families, and to establish equitable access to fertility care for LGBTQ+ people and others.
They’re also a rebuke to the so-called “Greater Than” campaign. This initiative seeks to prohibit legal recognition for any family that does not include a married mother and father and their biological children, including overturning the Supreme Court’s decision affirming the freedom to marry in Obergefellv. Hodges. The campaign was spearheaded by the organization “Them Before Us,” which is funded partly by the Heritage Foundation, the organization responsible for Project 2025, the Trump administration’s adopted blueprint to dismantle democracy and turn back the clock on gender equality.
GLAD Law’s Mary Bonauto with Jim Obergefell at the Supreme Court
The Greater Than campaign has yet to initiate legal action to overturn Obergefell, and any such action would have a very high bar to succeed. In fact, in November, the Supreme Court denied a request to revisit marriage equality in response to a petition submitted by a former Kentucky county clerk who was sued for refusing to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples. GLAD Law has a designated marriage defense team monitoring for any legitimate effort to challenge marriage equality and preparing every possible legal argument to defend it, should a real threat ever emerge.
“The only thing that has changed since Obergefell was decided is that people across the country have seen how marriage equality provides protection for families and children, and that protection strengthens communities, the economy, and our society,” said Mary Bonauto, GLAD Law Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies. “All families deserve equal rights under the law.”
Meanwhile, Them Before Us has actively opposed efforts to strengthen and expand family protections and access to fertility health care, testifying against a bill in Michigan which later became law. In 2017, the organization filed a brief supporting an Arkansas court decision that barred same-sex married couples from having both spouses’ names listed on their children’s birth certificates in the Supreme Court case Pavan v. Smith, which was ultimately decided in favor of the families.
“This campaign is an ill-considered attempt to undo marriage equality using outdated arguments about who is best suited to raise children, despite abundant data showing children of LGBTQ+ parents, like all children, thrive in homes with one or more adults who love and care for them. But their agenda also attacks no-fault divorce. It opposes surrogacy, fertility health care, and protections for children born through fertility health care,” said Polly Crozier, GLAD Law’s Director of Family Advocacy. “Taken together, it’s an extreme vision that would harm countless other Americans, not just LGBTQ+ families. What they’re pushing is a narrow definition of how families and society should function that the majority of Americans don’t support.”
That’s because more Americans personally know LGBTQ+ families and families formed through IVF, surrogacy, adoption, and other paths to parenthood, and believe all children should have the security of family recognition, no matter how their families came to be. As people share their own stories about struggling to access fertility care, encountering outdated parentage laws, or growing up with LGBTQ+ parents, it’s harder for extremist campaigns to rely on misinformation and fearmongering. The reality is that there is no single model for what an American family looks like, and these stories show politicians and policymakers what’s at stake when families aren’t fully protected under the law.
We’ll continue to uplift the stories of real people and families to emphasize the need for all children to have secure legal relationships with their parents, regardless of their biological connection or how their family was formed, and to ensure that LGBTQ+ people have equitable access to fertility health care.
That means collaborating with partners to advance pending bills in Massachusetts, Michigan, and Rhode Island to ensure that being LGBTQ+ isn’t a barrier to accessing fertility care, and to pass bills to update family protection laws in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
“The extremists behind the Greater Than campaign can try to narrow the definition of family, but they can’t erase the millions of diverse and loving families – including LGBTQ+ families – already thriving across the country,” Polly said. “We’re going to make sure the law protects them.”
The Enduring Power of Personal Stories
In 1978 – the same year GLAD Law was founded – Harvey Milk urged gay and lesbian Californians to come out in order to defeat a referendum banning gay people from working in public schools. Only by living openly, he argued, could LGBTQ+ people “break down the myths, destroy the lies and distortions” about them. The cruel paradox was that those lies endured precisely because it was often unsafe to be out. But Milk was right, and our community’s courage won the day. The ballot initiative went down to defeat.
LGBTQ+ people have been sharing our stories since, being vulnerable with loved ones, co-workers, faith communities, and the media to help shape public understanding of our lives, our families, our challenges, and our triumphs.
Personal stories remain one of the most powerful tools we have for changing hearts, minds, and policy, especially in this time of relentless federal attacks on our community. They are key to GLAD Law’s legislative advocacy.
“When lawmakers hear directly from the people they represent, policy stops being abstract and becomes personal,” Polly said. “Two minutes of a constituent’s personal testimony can really move policy.”
Geoff Worrell and his grandchildren
That’s how Geoff Worrell, a father of three and grandfather to seven, wound up testifying a few years back in favor of the Massachusetts Parentage Act, which is now law. He shared the story of how his eldest daughter Lyndsay and her wife had to adopt their own children, twins to whom Lyndsay gave birth, in order to establish their legal parentage. “It was so illuminating for legislators to hear this grandfather share the different experiences of his gay child and his straight children,” Polly said. “It cut right through to the inequality and its intergenerational impact on families.”
Geoff, who continues to advocate for LGBTQ+ family protections, said he is motivated to speak out by his deeply held values of family and fairness – which were shaped in part by his lived experience as both a Black man and a spouse in an interracial marriage – and honesty and integrity. “I think it’s really important for people to take action for what they believe in,” he said. “I need to do what’s right not only for myself, but what sort of example are you setting for your kids and your grandkids if you don’t stand up for what’s right?”
Indeed, in moments like this, your story matters! It reminds political leaders, policy makers, and the public what’s at stake: real children, real families, real lives. If you are part of an LGBTQ+ family, love someone who is, or want to share your family story to reflect the richness and diversity of American families, we want to connect with you. In raising our voices together, we can affirm what children need to succeed, counter fear and misinformation, and strengthen the fight for equality for all. Visit GLADLaw.org/ShareYourStory.
Advocates Commend Advance in Fertility Care Coverage for Connecticut Families
Fertility Access Connecticut (FACT) celebrates passage of bill to ensure private insurance uses standard-of-care, LGBTQ+-inclusive definition of infertility; calls on legislature to continue working toensure all Connecticut residents have equitable access to the care they need to start a family.
Fertility Access Connecticut, a coalition of LGBTQ+, reproductive health, and fertility care advocates commended the passage of HB 5374, a bipartisan bill which requires private insurers in Connecticut to provide coverage for fertility health care for LGBTQ+ couples and single individuals. The bill brings Connecticut’s private insurance market in line with the current standard-of-care definition of infertility.
Many people need fertility health care to build their families and paying out-of-pocket for care is not accessible for most families who do not have fertility insurance coverage. LGBTQ+ people face often prohibitive costs for care or must prove their infertility with less reliable, self-paid treatments. This bill is a step toward addressing the barriers to family building many people currently face in Connecticut.
While celebrating this advance, FACT members also urge the legislature to take the next step toward equitable access to fertility health care by requiring coverage for families insured by HUSKY Health. Current Connecticut law provides only limited coverage for infertility services for people with Medicaid as their insurance, which research indicates perpetuates racial disparities in access to fertility care. The status quo prioritizes only diagnosis but leaves people without the care they need to build a family. A separate bill to require coverage under HUSKY was introduced but not passed this session.
Patience Crozier, Director of Family Advocacy, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders said:
“GLAD Law hears time and again from hopeful Connecticut parents who are unable to access the health care they need to start their families. This bill represents an important step forward to ensure Connecticut’s definition of infertility for the private insurance market reflects the standard of care, which provides that LGBTQ people and people who need medical care to start and grow their families can access fertility health care. We’re grateful to the Chairs of the Insurance and Real Estate Committee, Senator Cabrera and Representative Wood, and to Representatives Nuccio and Allie-Brennan, for championing this measure to support Connecticut families, and we look forward to continuing to work with the legislature to end the exclusion of coverage of fertility care for families insured by HUSKY Health.”
Gretchen Raffa Chief Policy and Advocacy Officer, Planned Parenthood of Southern New England, said:
“We applaud the legislature for strengthening our state law to make fertility health care more accessible and inclusive of all people. This is especially important in a time when more threats to our reproductive freedom continue coming from the federal government, making it harder for people to decide whether, when, and how to build a family. With the passage of H.B. 5374 more people will have the freedom and power to make personal decisions about their bodies, lives, and futures. We are grateful for the leadership of co-chairs, Senator Cabrera and Representative Wood, and Representatives Allie-Brennan and Nuccio of the Insurance and Real Estate Committee for prioritizing this legislation to ensure that all people who pay for their private insurance are able to access the health care they need to build their families.”
Matthew Blinstrubas, Executive Director of Equality Connecticut, said:
“We’re happy that Connecticut has widened the universe of people who can create families to include queer families with private insurance. We’ll continue fighting for families covered by HUSKY who should not be left behind.
Karla Torres, Senior Human Rights Counsel, Center for Reproductive Rights, said:
“For so many people in the U.S., including single people and LGBTQ+ couples, access to fertility health care is essential to building their families, yet without insurance coverage it is out of reach for most. With this bill, Connecticut is one step closer to making sure everyone can get the affordable fertility care they need to build the families they want. We appreciate Connecticut lawmakers for coming together to pass this bi-partisan bill. At the same time, we recognize that there are more fertility health care gaps to fill and recommit ourselves to advocating for coverage under Connecticut’s’ HUSKY Health program. We all deserve the right to make decisions about our bodies and to access the health care we need without discrimination.”
Watch GLAD Law’s webinar on the state of LGBTQ+ rights in Connecticut and nationwide amid ongoing federal attacks on our communities. Review the resources and ways to take action shared during the event.
On May 20, 2026, GLAD Law attorneys shared updates on the state of LGBTQ+ rights at the federal and state levels during a live webinar discussion.
Watch the recording to learn more about:
What the recent Supreme Court decision in Chiles v. Salazar means for LGBTQ+ youth and their families in Connecticut
The latest on our challenge to Yale New Haven Health and Connecticut Children’s Medical Center over the shutdown of care for transgender youth
Ways to protect yourself, your loved ones, and our community in this moment
Featuring:
Polly Crozier, Director of Family Advocacy
Hannah Hussey, Staff Attorney
Bennett Klein, Senior Director of Litigation and HIV Law
And moderated by GLAD Law Board Member Alexandra Chandler.
Enter your email below to access the recording:
By submitting your email, you agree to receive updates from GLAD Law. You may unsubscribe at any time.
If you have any issues with this form or accessing the recording, please contact [email protected].
Since the ruling in Dobbsv. Jackson Women’s Health there has been a rapid acceleration of attacks on reproductive rights and on the basic right of people to make the most private decisions for themselves and their children. This broadening attack is concerning for so many people who rely on fertility health care to build their family, including for LGBTQ+ people, for whom assisted reproduction and gamete donation are a key part of family-building health care.
GLAD Law submitted testimony in opposition to SB293, vague and overbroad legislation to regulate fertility care and gamete donation that has not examined existing accountability mechanisms in Connecticut. Read our testimony to learn more.
12 Month Hormone & Contraceptive Coverage in Connecticut
With coordinated political efforts seeking to prevent access to medically necessary care, no patient should have to choose between their health and their financial stability.
While prescriptions may permit patients to pick up many months of refills at once, many insurers only cover the cost of the medication if patients pick up their refills more slowly over time. To obtain a medication supply that will last for a longer period, patients often need to pay out-of-pocket. For many patients and their families, this is financially burdensome or simply not possible.
GLAD Law submitted testimony in support of HB5482, legislation that would ensure coverage for supplies of hormone and contraceptive prescriptions for up to 12 months. This legislation would ensure that patients have a stop-gap option for continuity of treatment, in the event of an interruption to their access to medically necessary medications.
Expanding Medicaid Fertility Coverage in Connecticut
Connecticut does not currently provide adequate coverage for fertility health care for people on Medicaid. The status quo prioritizes only diagnosis but leaves people without the care they need to build a family.
GLAD Law submitted testimony in support of HB5483, a reasonable first step in improving access to coverage for hopeful parents. Given the increased attacks on reproductive rights from the Trump Administration, it is more important than ever for states like Connecticut to ensure their laws guarantee access to fertility health care.
Coverage for fertility treatment, including intrauterine insemination;
A definition of infertility that aligns with the current medical standard of care as articulated in the definition of infertility updated by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) dating to October 2023, which includes coverage for LGBTQ+ people, single people, and patients often excluded from coverage including those suffering from endometriosis or pelvic pain;
Provisions to ensure nondiscrimination in care; and
Language to ensure that IVF is studied so that coverage may include this best practice care in the future.
Strengthening Protections for Healthcare Providers in Connecticut
GLAD Law submitted testimony in support of SB227, legislation that would add an additional layer of protection for providers of reproductive and transgender healthcare.
SB227 would allow prescribers to list the name of their practice or facility, rather than their own name, when prescribing medication related to legally protected healthcare – thus strengthening the shield against potential civil or criminal litigation targeting clinicians simply for providing legal healthcare services. As the healthcare landscape becomes ever more challenging in many parts of the country, the bill is particularly important for providers whom residents of other states have sought out for care.
Ensuring Coverage for Infertility and Hormones in Connecticut
Update: HB5374 was signed into law on May 28. 2026. The law will go into effect on January 1, 2027.
GLAD Law submitted testimony on HB5374 urging the legislature to amend the bill to expand access to infertility insurance and ensure coverage for patients who are prescribed hormone medications.
Infertility Insurance Connecticut’s fertility insurance law does not reflect the current medical standard of care as articulated by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. As a result, LGBTQ people and single people who need to access fertility care and are paying for coverage can be excluded from care or face additional financial burdens to access care. In our testimony, GLAD Law suggested language to update the law so more Connecticut residents have access to the essential medical care they need to build their families.
Coverage for Hormone Treatment With coordinated political efforts seeking to prevent access to medically necessary care, no patient should have to choose between their health and their financial stability. While prescriptions may permit patients to pick up many months of refills at once, many insurers only cover the cost of the medication if patients pick up their refills more slowly over time. GLAD Law provided recommended language to amend HB5374 to ensure patients have an option to obtain a medication supply that will last for a longer period of time, in the event of an interruption to their access to hormone medications.
GLAD Law submitted testimony in support of SB295, legislation that would strengthen Connecticut’s shield law that protects patients and providers of reproductive and transgender healthcare. As other states increasingly impose barriers to medically necessary care, or ban it altogether, it is vital that Connecticut do all it can to ensure that providers are able to offer the essential care on which their patients depend. SB2965 would add new layers of protection for providers whose work is critical to maintaining access to essential and medically necessary healthcare. Learn more.